• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 6 pages
Exam (elaborations)

HREDU82 Assignment 4 (Inclusive Education) MEMO | Due 13 October 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 6 pages

HREDU82 Assignment 4 (Inclusive Education) MEMO | Due 13 October 2026. All questions fully answered.

Content preview

, PLEASE USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A GUIDE ONLY

The Role of Assistive Technology in Promoting Social Participation of Learners with Severe
Intellectual Disabilities in Inclusive Primary Schools

1) Introduction
This assignment presents the research methodology for a study investigating the role of assistive
technology (AT) in promoting the social participation of learners with severe intellectual disabilities
(SID) in inclusive primary schools.

The central research question is:
How can assistive technology promote the social participation of learners with severe intellectual
disabilities in inclusive primary schools?

This is examined through three sub-questions:
(1) What types of assistive technology are most effective in increasing reciprocal peer interactions
for learners with severe intellectual disabilities during unstructured school activities?
(2) How do classroom contextual factors mediate the relationship between assistive technology
provision and social participation outcomes? And
(3) What are the perspectives of learners with severe intellectual disabilities on their social
experiences and technology use?

The purpose of the study is to investigate the role of assistive technology in promoting the social
participation of learners with SID in inclusive primary schools, with a particular focus on
understanding the perspectives of learners, teachers, and support staff. The study aims to generate
evidence-informed resources for schools on implementing AT for social belonging. This assignment
discusses the methodological choices that will guide the study, including the research paradigm,
approach, design, sampling, data collection, data analysis, quality criteria, and ethical considerations.

2) Research Paradigm
This study is situated within the interpretive paradigm, which holds that reality is socially
constructed, subjective, and multiple, shaped by individuals' experiences, beliefs, and social contexts
(Wellington, 2015). Ontologically, interpretivism adopts a relativist position, embracing multiple
realities rather than a single objective truth (Creswell, 2013). Epistemologically, interpretivism is
subjectivist, recognising that knowledge is co-constructed through interaction between the researcher
and participants, and that meaning is not discovered but constructed (Crotty, 1998).

Interpretivism is appropriate for this study because it seeks to understand the lived experiences of
learners with SID regarding their social participation and technology use. These experiences are
inherently subjective and cannot be captured through objective, quantitative measures alone. Social
participation is a multifaceted concept that includes interpersonal relations, social inclusion, and
rights—all of which are experienced subjectively by individuals (Klavina, Pérez Fuster, & Sousa,
2024). An interpretive approach enables the researcher to access these subjective experiences
through observation, engagement, and dialogue. Furthermore, the study explores the perspectives of
multiple stakeholders—learners with SID, teachers, teaching assistants, and peers—each of whom
constructs their own understanding of social participation and technology use. Interpretivism's
acceptance of multiple realities allows the researcher to capture these diverse perspectives without
privileging one over another (Creswell, 2013). This paradigm also aligns with the shift from the
medical model to the social-ecological model of disability, which conceptualises disability as a
problem of alignment between the person and their environment (Klavina et al., 2024).

Document information

Uploaded on
September 23, 2026
Number of pages
6
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$4.66

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Aimark94
4.2
(661)
Sold
7647
Followers
3177
Items
2382
Last sold
1 hour ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions