ANSWERS A+ GRADED WITH EXPERT SOLUTIONS -
110 Questions with Answers
Page 1
,Q1. In the BSG footwear industry, a company's strategy to compete on differentiation
requires continuous investment in product quality and styling. Given the industry's
standard for 'superior' quality, which combination of actions is MOST LIKELY to
sustain a competitive advantage without eroding profitability?
A. Increase spending on TQM/Six Sigma programs while reducing celebrity
endorsement fees to fund higher worker wages.
B. Invest in superior materials and enhanced styling, but offset costs by raising prices
and improving production efficiency.
C. Cut prices aggressively to gain market share while maintaining current quality
levels.
D. Outsource production to low-cost countries and reduce marketing expenditures to
boost margins.
Correct Answer: B. Invest in superior materials and enhanced styling, but offset costs
by raising prices and improving production efficiency.
Rationale: Differentiation requires perceived quality improvements, which justify premium
pricing. Enhancing materials and styling while improving efficiency (e.g., lean
manufacturing) can control costs, preserving margins. Raising prices captures the value of
superior quality, aligning with a blue ocean strategy. Option A sacrifices brand appeal; C
erodes differentiation; D undermines quality and brand.
Why Wrong:
A - While TQM improves quality, cutting celebrity endorsements can reduce brand
visibility, and worker wages are not the primary cost driver.
C - Price cutting contradicts differentiation strategy and may trigger a price war,
reducing industry profitability.
D - Outsourcing can lower costs but may compromise quality and brand image, and
cutting marketing reduces differentiation.
Reference: Thompson, A. et al. (2026). Crafting & Executing Strategy, 24th Ed., Ch. 5.
Q2. A BSG company operates in both North America and Asia-Pacific. In the last
decision round, the exchange rate for the US dollar to the yen weakened significantly.
How would this MOST LIKELY affect the company's financial performance if its
Asia-Pacific revenues are in yen and costs are mostly in dollars?
A. Reported revenues in dollars will increase, boosting net profit.
B. Reported revenues in dollars will decrease, but cost of goods sold in dollars will also
decrease, offsetting the impact.
C. Reported revenues in dollars will decrease, reducing operating profit, unless offset
by price increases or cost cuts.
D. There will be no impact because the company can hedge currency risk through
forward contracts.
Page 2
,Correct Answer: C. Reported revenues in dollars will decrease, reducing operating
profit, unless offset by price increases or cost cuts.
Rationale: A weaker dollar (i.e., more dollars per yen) means yen revenues convert to
fewer dollars, reducing reported dollar revenues. Since costs are in dollars, they remain
unchanged, squeezing margins. Firms must adjust pricing or reduce costs to mitigate.
Hedging may reduce but not eliminate exposure.
Why Wrong:
A - A weaker dollar actually reduces dollar-reported revenues, not increases.
B - Costs in dollars do not change with exchange rates, so the offsetting effect is
incorrect.
D - Hedging can mitigate but not fully eliminate currency risk; the impact depends on
hedge coverage.
Reference: BSG Player's Guide (2026), Section on Exchange Rates.
Q3. In the BSG simulation, which of the following BEST illustrates a core competency
that can serve as a foundation for a sustainable competitive advantage?
A. Owning a large number of production facilities across multiple geographic regions.
B. Having a patented production process that reduces manufacturing costs by 30%.
C. Possessing a strong brand reputation that enables premium pricing.
D. Employing a skilled and experienced management team.
Correct Answer: B. Having a patented production process that reduces
manufacturing costs by 30%.
Rationale: A core competency must be valuable, rare, and difficult to imitate. A patented
process is legally protected and unique, providing a cost advantage that competitors
cannot easily replicate. Brand reputation (C) can be imitated; facilities (A) and
management (D) are not unique and can be matched.
Why Wrong:
A - Facilities are tangible resources that can be purchased or built by competitors, not
a core competency.
C - Brand reputation is valuable but can be eroded and imitated through marketing.
D - Management teams can be hired away; not inherently inimitable.
Reference: Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.
Journal of Management.
Q4. A BSG company is considering a major expansion of its online sales channel.
Which of the following metrics would be MOST critical to monitor to ensure that the
expansion is financially viable?
A. Number of unique website visitors per month.
B. Online revenue as a percentage of total revenue.
Page 3
, C. Contribution margin per pair sold online, after accounting for shipping and
marketing costs.
D. Customer satisfaction scores from online purchasers.
Correct Answer: C. Contribution margin per pair sold online, after accounting for
shipping and marketing costs.
Rationale: Financial viability hinges on profitability, not just volume. Contribution
margin per pair reflects the incremental profit from each online sale after variable costs
(shipping, marketing, etc.). High visitors or revenue share may not translate to profits if
costs are high. Satisfaction is important but secondary.
Why Wrong:
A - Visitors are a top-funnel metric; they do not indicate profitability.
B - Revenue share alone does not consider costs.
D - Satisfaction influences repeat purchases but does not directly measure
profitability.
Reference: BSG Player's Guide (2026), Financial Metrics.
Q5. In the BSG simulation, which of the following is a key difference between the
'one-year' and 'two-year' production planning approaches?
A. One-year planning requires more precise demand forecasting to avoid inventory
gluts or shortages.
B. Two-year planning allows for more flexible adjustment of production in response to
market changes.
C. One-year planning is more suitable for companies with low capacity utilization.
D. Two-year planning reduces the need for accurate demand forecasts.
Correct Answer: A. One-year planning requires more precise demand forecasting to
avoid inventory gluts or shortages.
Rationale: One-year planning locks in production for a full year, so misestimates lead to
excess inventory or stockouts. Two-year planning commits to two years of production but
allows adjustments in the second year based on market feedback. Thus one-year planning
demands more accurate initial forecasts.
Why Wrong:
B - Two-year planning actually reduces flexibility in the first year; adjustments are
limited.
C - Capacity utilization is not directly related to planning horizon.
D - Two-year planning still requires forecasting; it just spreads the risk.
Reference: BSG Player's Guide (2026), Production Planning.
Q6. A BSG company is considering offering a 'buy one get one half off' promotion on
its private-label footwear. Which of the following is a potential unintended
Page 4