2026/2027 EXAM QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS | 100% PASS
Pria sued Dirk for breach of contract. The parties held a Rule 26(f)
conference, and Pria produced all of her initial disclosures. Dirk did not,
but told Pria he would. However, he waited until 90 days before trial
because his disclosures contained his expert's information. Was this ok?
- ANSWER ✔✔Yes, because expert information is not due until 90
days before trial.
Delia served RFAs on Peter on February 1. As of March 15, Delia had
still not served any written responses. How will the court treat the RFAs?
- ANSWER ✔✔The RFAs will be deemed admitted.
, Paulette sued her doctor after she suffered serious side effects from the
use of an chemical the doctor used in a procedure he performed. Use of
the chemical violated federal law. Paulette is aware that the doctor's
medical supplier has documents in its possession indicating that the
doctor used this particular chemical because it was less expensive than
alternative chemicals and purposefully concealed its use. Can Paulette
properly obtain these documents from the supplier under the FRCP? -
ANSWER ✔✔Yes, Paulette may subpoena the documents from the
supplier.
Same facts as the last hypo. Paulette now wants to depose three
witnesses, including the doctor. She sent a notice to the doctor to appear
for deposition. The doctor failed to appear the first time it was scheduled,
so this time, Paulette included a subpoena ordering the doctor to attend
and to bring her medical file with her. The parties' lawyers met and
conferred but did not stipulate to the deposition. However, the doctor's
attorney did not file an objection or other motion to the scheduling notice.
Does the doctor have to comply? - ANSWER ✔✔Yes, the depo may
be scheduled without leave of court, and the doctor may be compelled to
appear by a subpoena served on her.
Katie sued Bank, Inc. alleging that they violated her employment
contract by firing her right before she was to be promoted with a raise.