British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN
Visual Testing Level 1 Examination
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and
escalation of ambiguous findings for safe? Case EB-2715-0001: 6 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 17 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 16 unit(s).
A. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and
escalation of ambiguous; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 16-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related
damage mechanisms through realistic? Case EB-2715-0002: 4 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 6 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 14 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Discontinuity formation, material processing history and
service-related damage mechanisms; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
C. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
D. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 14-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and
performance checks with emphasis on boundaries and? Case EB-2715-0003: 2 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 19 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 12 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with against current requirements
and evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 12-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should
resolve the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected
flaw orientation for defensible calculations? Case EB-2715-0004: 9 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 8 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 10 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation for;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 10-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage
requirements including recognition of abnormal or? Case EB-2715-0005: 7 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 21 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements including; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Visual Testing Level 1 Examination
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Signal, indication or image interpretation and separation of relevant from
false responses to support reliable? Case EB-2715-0006: 5 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 10 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 6 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Signal, indication or image interpretation and separation of relevant from false responses; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Signal, indication or image interpretation and separation of relevant from false against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 6-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without
exceeding authorization integrated across the tasks? Case EB-2715-0007: 3 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 23 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 4 unit(s).
A. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without
exceeding authorization; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without exceeding authorization against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 4-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Entry-level terminology, component recognition and safe completion of
routine tasks within the nondestructive? Case EB-2715-0008: 10 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 12 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 2 unit(s).
A. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
B. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
C. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Entry-level terminology, component recognition and safe
completion of routine tasks within; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
D. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Entry-level terminology, component recognition and safe completion of routine tasks against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 2-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Basic checks, straightforward calculations and prompt reporting of
conditions beyond authorization as applied to? Case EB-2715-0009: 8 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 1 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 19 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Basic checks, straightforward calculations and prompt reporting of conditions beyond; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Basic checks, straightforward calculations and prompt reporting of conditions beyond against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 19-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and
traceable records with decisions and evidence? Case EB-2715-0010: 6 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 14 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 17 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable records with; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable records with against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 17-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Visual Testing Level 1 Examination
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of ambiguous findings for safe during
a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2715-0011: 4 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 3 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 15 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
C. Check calibration and method controls affecting Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of ambiguous, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 15-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage mechanisms through realistic
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2715-0012: 2 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 16 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 13 unit(s).
A. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Check calibration and method controls affecting Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage mechanisms, investigate
the unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 13-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with emphasis on
boundaries and during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2715-0013: 9 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 5 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with against current requirements
and evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should
resolve the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation for defensible
calculations during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2715-0014: 7 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 18 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 9 unit(s).
A. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation for, repeat the
calculation with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 9-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements including recognition of abnormal
or during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2715-0015: 5 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 7 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 7 unit(s).
A. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements including, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 7-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Visual Testing Level 1 Examination
Page 4
Visual Testing Level 1 Examination
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and
escalation of ambiguous findings for safe? Case EB-2715-0001: 6 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 17 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 16 unit(s).
A. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and
escalation of ambiguous; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 16-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related
damage mechanisms through realistic? Case EB-2715-0002: 4 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 6 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 14 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Discontinuity formation, material processing history and
service-related damage mechanisms; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
C. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
D. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 14-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and
performance checks with emphasis on boundaries and? Case EB-2715-0003: 2 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 19 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 12 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with against current requirements
and evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 12-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should
resolve the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected
flaw orientation for defensible calculations? Case EB-2715-0004: 9 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 8 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 10 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation for;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 10-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage
requirements including recognition of abnormal or? Case EB-2715-0005: 7 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 21 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements including; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Visual Testing Level 1 Examination
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Signal, indication or image interpretation and separation of relevant from
false responses to support reliable? Case EB-2715-0006: 5 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 10 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 6 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Signal, indication or image interpretation and separation of relevant from false responses; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Signal, indication or image interpretation and separation of relevant from false against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 6-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without
exceeding authorization integrated across the tasks? Case EB-2715-0007: 3 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 23 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 4 unit(s).
A. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without
exceeding authorization; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without exceeding authorization against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 4-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Entry-level terminology, component recognition and safe completion of
routine tasks within the nondestructive? Case EB-2715-0008: 10 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 12 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 2 unit(s).
A. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
B. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
C. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Entry-level terminology, component recognition and safe
completion of routine tasks within; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
D. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Entry-level terminology, component recognition and safe completion of routine tasks against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 2-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Basic checks, straightforward calculations and prompt reporting of
conditions beyond authorization as applied to? Case EB-2715-0009: 8 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 1 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 19 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Basic checks, straightforward calculations and prompt reporting of conditions beyond; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Basic checks, straightforward calculations and prompt reporting of conditions beyond against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 19-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and
traceable records with decisions and evidence? Case EB-2715-0010: 6 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 14 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 17 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable records with; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable records with against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 17-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Visual Testing Level 1 Examination
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of ambiguous findings for safe during
a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2715-0011: 4 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 3 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 15 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
C. Check calibration and method controls affecting Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of ambiguous, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 15-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage mechanisms through realistic
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2715-0012: 2 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 16 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 13 unit(s).
A. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Check calibration and method controls affecting Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage mechanisms, investigate
the unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 13-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with emphasis on
boundaries and during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2715-0013: 9 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 5 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with against current requirements
and evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should
resolve the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation for defensible
calculations during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2715-0014: 7 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 18 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 9 unit(s).
A. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation for, repeat the
calculation with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 9-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements including recognition of abnormal
or during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2715-0015: 5 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 7 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 7 unit(s).
A. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements including, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 7-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Visual Testing Level 1 Examination
Page 4
