Northwest Territories Apprenticeship ?
Industrial Electrician Cert. Exam
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response
within the maritime navigation and vessel? Case EB-2574-0001: 9 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 20 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response within the maritime; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response within the against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel
documentation as applied to maritime navigation and? Case EB-2574-0002: 7 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 9 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 6 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation as applied to; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation as applied against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 6-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional
judgment with decisions and evidence? Case EB-2574-0003: 5 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 22 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 4 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment with; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment with against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 4-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning for
safe, accurate work in maritime navigation? Case EB-2574-0004: 3 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 11 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 2 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning for safe, accurate work; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning for safe, accurate against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 2-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Collision regulations, lights, shapes, sound signals and right-of-way
decisions through realistic maritime? Case EB-2574-0005: 10 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 24 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 19 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Collision regulations, lights, shapes, sound signals and right-of-way decisions through; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Collision regulations, lights, shapes, sound signals and right-of-way decisions through against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 19-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Northwest Territories Apprenticeship ? Industrial Electrician Cert. Exam
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Tides, currents, weather, under-keel clearance and local navigation
hazards with emphasis on boundaries and? Case EB-2574-0006: 8 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 13 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 17 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Tides, currents, weather, under-keel clearance and local navigation hazards with emphasis;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Tides, currents, weather, under-keel clearance and local navigation hazards with against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 17-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Ship handling, propulsion response, turning, stopping, anchoring and
berthing for defensible calculations and? Case EB-2574-0007: 6 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 2 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 15 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Ship handling, propulsion response, turning, stopping, anchoring and berthing for; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Ship handling, propulsion response, turning, stopping, anchoring and berthing for against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 15-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Conductors, insulation, raceways, cables and ampacity or derating
calculations including recognition of abnormal or? Case EB-2574-0008: 4 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 15 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 13 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Conductors, insulation, raceways, cables and ampacity or derating calculations including; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Conductors, insulation, raceways, cables and ampacity or derating calculations against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 13-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Overcurrent, ground-fault, bonding, earthing and shock-protection
principles to support reliable, ethical maritime? Case EB-2574-0009: 2 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 4 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Overcurrent, ground-fault, bonding, earthing and shock-protection principles to support; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
D. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Overcurrent, ground-fault, bonding, earthing and shock-protection principles to support against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Training-needs analysis, competence verification and safety
communication integrated across the tasks expected in? Case EB-2574-0010: 9 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 17 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 9 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Training-needs analysis, competence verification and safety communication integrated across;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Training-needs analysis, competence verification and safety communication integrated against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 9-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Northwest Territories Apprenticeship ? Industrial Electrician Cert. Exam
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response within the maritime navigation and vessel
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2574-0011: 7 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 6 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 7 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response within the maritime, repeat the
calculation with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response within the against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 7-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation as applied to maritime navigation
and during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2574-0012: 5 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s)
are available, the last review was 19 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 5 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation as applied to, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation as applied against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 5-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment with decisions and evidence
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2574-0013: 3 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 8 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 3 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment with, repeat the calculation with
an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment with against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 3-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning for safe, accurate work in maritime navigation
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2574-0014: 10 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 21 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 1 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning for safe, accurate work, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning for safe, accurate against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 1-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Collision regulations, lights, shapes, sound signals and right-of-way decisions through realistic maritime during a
pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2574-0015: 8 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 10 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 18 unit(s).
A. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Collision regulations, lights, shapes, sound signals and right-of-way decisions through, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Collision regulations, lights, shapes, sound signals and right-of-way decisions through against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 18-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Northwest Territories Apprenticeship ? Industrial Electrician Cert. Exam
Page 4
Industrial Electrician Cert. Exam
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response
within the maritime navigation and vessel? Case EB-2574-0001: 9 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 20 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response within the maritime; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response within the against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel
documentation as applied to maritime navigation and? Case EB-2574-0002: 7 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 9 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 6 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation as applied to; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation as applied against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 6-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional
judgment with decisions and evidence? Case EB-2574-0003: 5 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 22 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 4 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment with; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment with against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 4-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning for
safe, accurate work in maritime navigation? Case EB-2574-0004: 3 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 11 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 2 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning for safe, accurate work; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning for safe, accurate against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 2-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Collision regulations, lights, shapes, sound signals and right-of-way
decisions through realistic maritime? Case EB-2574-0005: 10 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 24 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 19 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Collision regulations, lights, shapes, sound signals and right-of-way decisions through; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Collision regulations, lights, shapes, sound signals and right-of-way decisions through against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 19-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Northwest Territories Apprenticeship ? Industrial Electrician Cert. Exam
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Tides, currents, weather, under-keel clearance and local navigation
hazards with emphasis on boundaries and? Case EB-2574-0006: 8 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 13 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 17 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Tides, currents, weather, under-keel clearance and local navigation hazards with emphasis;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Tides, currents, weather, under-keel clearance and local navigation hazards with against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 17-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Ship handling, propulsion response, turning, stopping, anchoring and
berthing for defensible calculations and? Case EB-2574-0007: 6 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 2 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 15 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Ship handling, propulsion response, turning, stopping, anchoring and berthing for; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Ship handling, propulsion response, turning, stopping, anchoring and berthing for against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 15-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Conductors, insulation, raceways, cables and ampacity or derating
calculations including recognition of abnormal or? Case EB-2574-0008: 4 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 15 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 13 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Conductors, insulation, raceways, cables and ampacity or derating calculations including; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Conductors, insulation, raceways, cables and ampacity or derating calculations against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 13-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Overcurrent, ground-fault, bonding, earthing and shock-protection
principles to support reliable, ethical maritime? Case EB-2574-0009: 2 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 4 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Overcurrent, ground-fault, bonding, earthing and shock-protection principles to support; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
D. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Overcurrent, ground-fault, bonding, earthing and shock-protection principles to support against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Training-needs analysis, competence verification and safety
communication integrated across the tasks expected in? Case EB-2574-0010: 9 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 17 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 9 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Training-needs analysis, competence verification and safety communication integrated across;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Training-needs analysis, competence verification and safety communication integrated against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 9-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Northwest Territories Apprenticeship ? Industrial Electrician Cert. Exam
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response within the maritime navigation and vessel
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2574-0011: 7 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 6 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 7 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response within the maritime, repeat the
calculation with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response within the against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 7-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation as applied to maritime navigation
and during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2574-0012: 5 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s)
are available, the last review was 19 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 5 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation as applied to, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation as applied against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 5-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment with decisions and evidence
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2574-0013: 3 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 8 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 3 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment with, repeat the calculation with
an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment with against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 3-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning for safe, accurate work in maritime navigation
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2574-0014: 10 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 21 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 1 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning for safe, accurate work, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning for safe, accurate against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 1-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Collision regulations, lights, shapes, sound signals and right-of-way decisions through realistic maritime during a
pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2574-0015: 8 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 10 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 18 unit(s).
A. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Collision regulations, lights, shapes, sound signals and right-of-way decisions through, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Collision regulations, lights, shapes, sound signals and right-of-way decisions through against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 18-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Northwest Territories Apprenticeship ? Industrial Electrician Cert. Exam
Page 4
