Yukon Apprenticeship and Tradesperson
Qualifications Glazier Certification Examination
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Bridge equipment, radar, AIS, electronic charts and communication
procedures for safe, accurate work in maritime? Case EB-2523-0001: 3 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 17 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 14 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Bridge equipment, radar, AIS, electronic charts and communication procedures for safe; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Bridge equipment, radar, AIS, electronic charts and communication procedures for safe against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 14-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Cargo, stability, trim, stress and watertight-integrity considerations
through realistic maritime navigation and? Case EB-2523-0002: 10 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 6 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 12 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Cargo, stability, trim, stress and watertight-integrity considerations through realistic; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Cargo, stability, trim, stress and watertight-integrity considerations through against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 12-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Watchkeeping, bridge-resource management and pilot-master
information exchange with emphasis on boundaries and? Case EB-2523-0003: 8 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 19 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 10 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Watchkeeping, bridge-resource management and pilot-master information exchange with; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Watchkeeping, bridge-resource management and pilot-master information exchange with against current requirements
and evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 10-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should
resolve the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response
for defensible calculations and documentation? Case EB-2523-0004: 6 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 8 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response for defensible; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response for defensible against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel
documentation including recognition of abnormal or? Case EB-2523-0005: 4 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 21 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 6 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation including; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 6-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Yukon Apprenticeship and Tradesperson Qualifications Glazier Certification Examination
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional
judgment to support reliable, ethical? Case EB-2523-0006: 2 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 10 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 4 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment to support; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment to against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 4-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning
integrated across the tasks expected in? Case EB-2523-0007: 9 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 23 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 2 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning integrated across the; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning integrated across against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 2-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Structural load paths, connections and support conditions relevant to the
work within the maritime navigation and? Case EB-2523-0008: 7 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 12 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 19 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Structural load paths, connections and support conditions relevant to the work within the; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Structural load paths, connections and support conditions relevant to the work within against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 19-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Building-code classifications, occupancy, fire safety and accessibility
provisions as applied to maritime? Case EB-2523-0009: 5 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last review was
1 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 17 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Building-code classifications, occupancy, fire safety and accessibility provisions as; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Building-code classifications, occupancy, fire safety and accessibility provisions as against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 17-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Entry-level terminology, component recognition and safe completion of
routine tasks with decisions and evidence? Case EB-2523-0010: 3 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 14 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 15 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Entry-level terminology, component recognition and safe completion of routine tasks with; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Entry-level terminology, component recognition and safe completion of routine tasks against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 15-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Yukon Apprenticeship and Tradesperson Qualifications Glazier Certification Examination
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Bridge equipment, radar, AIS, electronic charts and communication procedures for safe, accurate work in
maritime during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2523-0011: 10 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 3 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 13 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Bridge equipment, radar, AIS, electronic charts and communication procedures for safe, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Bridge equipment, radar, AIS, electronic charts and communication procedures for safe against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 13-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Cargo, stability, trim, stress and watertight-integrity considerations through realistic maritime navigation and
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2523-0012: 8 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 16 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Cargo, stability, trim, stress and watertight-integrity considerations through realistic, repeat the calculation with
an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Cargo, stability, trim, stress and watertight-integrity considerations through against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Watchkeeping, bridge-resource management and pilot-master information exchange with emphasis on
boundaries and during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2523-0013: 6 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 5 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 9 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
C. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Watchkeeping, bridge-resource management and pilot-master information exchange with, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Watchkeeping, bridge-resource management and pilot-master information exchange with against current requirements
and evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 9-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should
resolve the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response for defensible calculations and
documentation during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2523-0014: 4 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 18 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 7 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response for defensible, repeat the calculation with
an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response for defensible against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 7-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation including recognition of abnormal or
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2523-0015: 2 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 7 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 5 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation including, repeat the calculation with
an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 5-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Yukon Apprenticeship and Tradesperson Qualifications Glazier Certification Examination
Page 4
Qualifications Glazier Certification Examination
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Bridge equipment, radar, AIS, electronic charts and communication
procedures for safe, accurate work in maritime? Case EB-2523-0001: 3 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 17 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 14 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Bridge equipment, radar, AIS, electronic charts and communication procedures for safe; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Bridge equipment, radar, AIS, electronic charts and communication procedures for safe against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 14-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Cargo, stability, trim, stress and watertight-integrity considerations
through realistic maritime navigation and? Case EB-2523-0002: 10 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 6 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 12 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Cargo, stability, trim, stress and watertight-integrity considerations through realistic; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Cargo, stability, trim, stress and watertight-integrity considerations through against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 12-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Watchkeeping, bridge-resource management and pilot-master
information exchange with emphasis on boundaries and? Case EB-2523-0003: 8 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 19 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 10 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Watchkeeping, bridge-resource management and pilot-master information exchange with; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Watchkeeping, bridge-resource management and pilot-master information exchange with against current requirements
and evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 10-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should
resolve the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response
for defensible calculations and documentation? Case EB-2523-0004: 6 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 8 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response for defensible; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response for defensible against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel
documentation including recognition of abnormal or? Case EB-2523-0005: 4 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 21 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 6 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation including; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 6-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Yukon Apprenticeship and Tradesperson Qualifications Glazier Certification Examination
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional
judgment to support reliable, ethical? Case EB-2523-0006: 2 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 10 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 4 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment to support; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Jurisdictional pilotage requirements, local knowledge and professional judgment to against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 4-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning
integrated across the tasks expected in? Case EB-2523-0007: 9 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 23 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 2 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning integrated across the; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Nautical charts, publications, position fixing and passage planning integrated across against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 2-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Structural load paths, connections and support conditions relevant to the
work within the maritime navigation and? Case EB-2523-0008: 7 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 12 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 19 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Structural load paths, connections and support conditions relevant to the work within the; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Structural load paths, connections and support conditions relevant to the work within against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 19-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Building-code classifications, occupancy, fire safety and accessibility
provisions as applied to maritime? Case EB-2523-0009: 5 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last review was
1 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 17 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Building-code classifications, occupancy, fire safety and accessibility provisions as; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Building-code classifications, occupancy, fire safety and accessibility provisions as against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 17-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Entry-level terminology, component recognition and safe completion of
routine tasks with decisions and evidence? Case EB-2523-0010: 3 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 14 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 15 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Entry-level terminology, component recognition and safe completion of routine tasks with; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Entry-level terminology, component recognition and safe completion of routine tasks against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 15-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Yukon Apprenticeship and Tradesperson Qualifications Glazier Certification Examination
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Bridge equipment, radar, AIS, electronic charts and communication procedures for safe, accurate work in
maritime during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2523-0011: 10 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 3 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 13 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Bridge equipment, radar, AIS, electronic charts and communication procedures for safe, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Bridge equipment, radar, AIS, electronic charts and communication procedures for safe against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 13-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Cargo, stability, trim, stress and watertight-integrity considerations through realistic maritime navigation and
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2523-0012: 8 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 16 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Cargo, stability, trim, stress and watertight-integrity considerations through realistic, repeat the calculation with
an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Cargo, stability, trim, stress and watertight-integrity considerations through against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Watchkeeping, bridge-resource management and pilot-master information exchange with emphasis on
boundaries and during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2523-0013: 6 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 5 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 9 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
C. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Watchkeeping, bridge-resource management and pilot-master information exchange with, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Watchkeeping, bridge-resource management and pilot-master information exchange with against current requirements
and evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 9-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should
resolve the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response for defensible calculations and
documentation during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2523-0014: 4 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 18 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 7 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response for defensible, repeat the calculation with
an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Distress, fire, flooding, abandon-ship and search-and-rescue response for defensible against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 7-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation including recognition of abnormal or
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2523-0015: 2 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 7 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 5 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation including, repeat the calculation with
an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Pollution prevention, security, logbooks and statutory vessel documentation including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 5-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Yukon Apprenticeship and Tradesperson Qualifications Glazier Certification Examination
Page 4
