Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 32 pages
Exam (elaborations)

TEXAS PE ETHICS EXAM: SCENARIO-BASED QUESTIONS & ANSWERS DERIVED FROM THE TEXAS ENGINEERING PRACTICE ACT AND BOARD RULES

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 32 pages

TEXAS PE ETHICS EXAM: SCENARIO-BASED QUESTIONS & ANSWERS DERIVED FROM THE TEXAS ENGINEERING PRACTICE ACT AND BOARD RULES

Content preview

TEXAS PE ETHICS EXAM: SCENARIO-
BASED QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
DERIVED FROM THE TEXAS
ENGINEERING PRACTICE ACT AND
BOARD RULES

Scenario 1: Direct Supervision and Sealing of Work
This scenario is adapted from the official Texas Ethics Exam materials .

The Facts: John, a licensed PE, is the supervisor of Maria, a graduate engineer. John
seals drawings for a project that Maria prepared, but he does so without adequately
reviewing them or the load calculations. Later, John allows a contractor to use these
sealed drawings for a different project. Maria, an unlicensed individual, also signs off
on some calculations as "Engineer."

Question 1: Which board rule most directly addresses John's responsibility to
provide direct supervision over Maria's engineering work before sealing it?

• A) §137.55(a)
• B) §137.59(a)
• C) §137.63(b)(2)
• D) §137.33(b)
• E) §139.17
• Answer: D) §137.33(b)
• Rationale: Board Rule §137.33(b) requires that a PE only seal work performed
under his "direct supervision" as defined in §131.2. John's failure to review
before sealing violates this rule .

Question 2: Which section most clearly prohibits a license holder from affixing their
seal without adequate review?

• A) §137.63(c)(1)
• B) §137.33(f)
• C) §137.55(b)
• D) §1001.004
• E) §137.65(a)

, • Answer: B) §137.33(f)
• Rationale: §137.33(f) requires that the seal and signature be placed on the
"final version" of the work. Sealing without adequate review means it is not a
final version for which the engineer can take professional responsibility .

Question 3: By allowing a contractor to use sealed drawings prepared for a different
project, John may have violated which provision?

• A) §137.63(a)
• B) §137.33(i)
• C) §137.59(a)
• D) §137.65(b)
• E) §139.13
• Answer: B) §137.33(i)
• Rationale: §137.33(i) prohibits the misuse of engineering documents,
including using them outside the scope for which they were prepared without
proper authorization .

Question 4: If Maria, an unlicensed graduate engineer, signs off on calculations as
"Engineer," which part of the Act is most directly violated?

• A) §1001.301
• B) §137.59(a)
• C) §137.63(c)(1)
• D) §137.65(a)
• E) §139.17
• Answer: A) §1001.301
• Rationale: Texas Occupations Code §1001.301 prohibits the practice of
engineering without a license. Signing off as "Engineer" constitutes
unauthorized practice .




🤝 Scenario 2: Conflicts of Interest and Gifts
This scenario explores the rules surrounding gifts and impartiality.

The Facts: Rachelle, a licensed engineer and corporate officer, receives a Request for
Proposal (RFP) from a county official for a hydrology study. She reminds the official
that competitive bidding for engineering services in the public sector is prohibited.
Later, her firm prepares a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) and considers
embellishing their local capabilities. David, a PE, is on a selection committee and is
offered tickets to a sporting event by a bidder .

,Question 5: Under Board Rule §137.57(a), accepting gifts or favors from bidders is:

• A) Permissible if disclosed to the employer.
• B) Strictly prohibited as it may influence professional judgment.
• C) Allowed if the value is under $50.
• D) Permissible if the PE abstains from voting on that bidder.
• Answer: B) Strictly prohibited as it may influence professional judgment.
• Rationale: The prohibition on accepting gifts from bidders is absolute to
prevent any conflict of interest or appearance of impropriety, as per
§137.57(a) .

Question 6: If David's supervisor allows him to keep the tickets, what must David do
to remain fully compliant?

• A) Abstain from decision-making related to the bidder.
• B) Return the tickets and decline.
• C) Document the acceptance and supervisor's approval.
• D) Request the bidder withdraw their bid.
• E) None; accepting tickets is strictly prohibited regardless of disclosure.
• Answer: E) None; accepting tickets is strictly prohibited regardless of
disclosure.
• Rationale: The prohibition under §137.57(a) is absolute; it cannot be
overridden by a supervisor's permission or an employer's policy .

Question 7: Which board rule gives guidance to engineers on the matter of
"inducements" in securing work?

• A) §137.57(b)
• B) §137.57(c)
• C) §137.57(d)
• D) §137.63(c)(4)
• E) §137.63(c)(5)
• Answer: C) §137.57(d)
• Rationale: §137.57(d) provides guidance on conflicts of interest and prohibits
using inducements to secure engineering work .

Question 8: Which Section of the Act or board rule most clearly directs Rachelle and
her firm regarding representations in the SOQ?

• A) §1001.203
• B) §1001.402
• C) §1001.407
• D) §137.57(a)
• E) §137.53(a)
• Answer: D) §137.57(a)

, • Rationale: This rule requires engineers to be objective and truthful in their
professional statements, which applies to representations in an SOQ .




🧭 Scenario 3: Foundational Concepts and Competence
These questions focus on core principles and the scope of practice.

The Facts: Ahmed is a licensed PE with expertise in transportation engineering. He is
asked to design a high-rise building, a field outside his competence. He considers
taking the project and relying on software he is unfamiliar with .

Question 9: Which rule requires engineers to practice only in their areas of
competence?

• A) §137.59(a)
• B) §137.57(b)
• C) §137.63(a)
• D) §1001.004
• E) §137.65(a)
• Answer: A) §137.59(a)
• Rationale: Board Rule §137.59(a) requires that engineers perform services
only in areas where they are competent by education or experience .

Question 10: If Ahmed takes the project anyway and relies on computer software
without understanding its limitations, what rule is violated?

• A) §137.59(b) – Not performing assignments for which not qualified.
• B) §137.57(a) – Gifts.
• C) §137.63(c)(1) – Professional conduct.
• D) §1001.301 – License.
• E) §137.33(b) – Supervision.
• Answer: A) §137.59(b)
• Rationale: §137.59(b) prohibits accepting assignments beyond one's
competence without obtaining proper expertise .

Question 11: What is the primary purpose of the Texas Engineering Practice Act?

• A) To benefit the engineering profession.
• B) To protect the public from the unauthorized and unqualified practice
of engineering.
• C) To establish fees for engineering licenses.
• D) To promote the engineering profession.

Document information

Uploaded on
September 3, 2026
Number of pages
32
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$20.59

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
1
Followers
0
Items
407
Last sold
3 weeks ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions