UC Berkeley COGSCI 1 Midterm 1 Exam Study
Guide | 300 Practice Questions with Correct
Answers & Detailed Rationales | Complete
Review of Cognitive Science Foundations,
Memory, Vision, AI, and Neuroscience
PASS YOUR UC BERKELEY COGSCI 1 MIDTERM 1 WITH
CONFIDENCE!
This comprehensive guide features 300 expert-written multiple-
choice questions covering every core topic: CRUM
(Computational-Representational Understanding of Mind),
Marr’s Three Levels, Memory Systems, Visual Processing, Neural
Networks, Philosophy of Mind, and Key Thinkers (Chomsky,
Fodor, Searle, Treisman).
Each question includes the correct answer in bold italics and a
detailed rationale explaining the logic—so you learn the why
behind every answer. Perfect for self-testing, active recall, and
concept mastery. Covers classic experiments, brain structures,
and cognitive biases tested on the exam.
Ace your midterm with this ultimate test bank
,2|Page
Question 1:
The philosophical position known as "eliminative materialism" claims that:
A) Mental states are identical to brain states, but we may never be able to map them
perfectly due to the complexity of the brain.
B) Our common-sense psychological concepts (like "belief," "desire," and "pain")
form a false theory that will eventually be replaced by a complete neuroscientific
account.
C) Mental states are real but non-physical substances that interact with the physical
brain through the pineal gland.
D) While mental states are caused by physical processes, they have causal powers of
their own that cannot be reduced to neurobiology.
Answer: B
Rationale: Eliminative materialism, most notably defended by Paul and Patricia
Churchland, argues that folk psychology is a flawed theoretical framework—similar to
outdated scientific theories like phlogiston or caloric fluid. As neuroscience advances, it
will not reduce folk psychological terms to brain states (as in reductive materialism);
rather, it will eliminate them altogether, replacing them with a more accurate
neurobiological vocabulary. Option A describes reductive materialism (type-identity
theory), option C describes Cartesian dualism, and option D describes property dualism
or emergentism.
Question 2:
Which of the following best describes the "poverty of the stimulus" argument as
used by Noam Chomsky in the context of language acquisition?
,3|Page
A) Children are exposed to too little linguistic data to learn all the grammatical rules
of their native language, so they must rely on corrective feedback from adults.
B) The linguistic input available to children is degenerate and incomplete, yet they
acquire a rich and complex grammar, implying that some knowledge of language
structure must be innate.
C) Children from impoverished socioeconomic backgrounds receive less language
input, which permanently impairs their syntactic development.
D) The stimulus for language learning is impoverished because most languages lack
a consistent word order, making it impossible to learn grammar from input alone.
Answer: B
Rationale: Chomsky argued that the primary linguistic data children hear is full of false
starts, slips, and incomplete sentences, yet children converge on the same complex
grammatical rules regardless of their environment. Since the input underdetermines
the output, Chomsky posited an innate Universal Grammar. Option A incorrectly
emphasizes corrective feedback (which is not the main argument), C confuses the term
"poverty" with socioeconomic status, and D is false because most languages do have
consistent word order.
Question 3:
In the context of Marr's three levels of analysis, which level is primarily concerned
with the physical or biological mechanisms that realize a computation?
A) The computational level
B) The algorithmic level
C) The implementational level
D) The semantic level
Answer: C
Rationale: Marr's implementational (or hardware) level asks how the algorithm is
physically realized—for example, in neural circuitry, silicon chips, or biological tissue.
The computational level defines the goal of the computation, the algorithmic level
, 4|Page
specifies representations and processes, and "semantic level" is not part of Marr's
framework.
Question 4:
A researcher claims that "cognition can only be understood by studying the dynamic
interactions between an agent, its body, and its environment over time." This view is
most consistent with which paradigm in cognitive science?
A) The symbolic paradigm
B) The connectionist paradigm
C) The dynamical systems paradigm
D) The classical AI paradigm
Answer: C
Rationale: The dynamical systems paradigm, associated with thinkers like Tim van
Gelder and Esther Thelen, rejects the idea that cognition is static symbol manipulation.
Instead, it treats cognitive processes as continuous, non-linear, and deeply embedded
in real-time sensorimotor interactions with the environment. Symbolic and classical AI
paradigms focus on discrete representations, while connectionism uses distributed
neural networks.
Question 5:
The discovery of "grandmother cells" in the human medial temporal lobe suggests
that:
A) All neurons respond to multiple categories in a fully distributed manner.
B) Some individual neurons exhibit highly selective responses to specific concepts,
such as a particular person or landmark.