Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 8 pages
Exam (elaborations)

HED4810 Assignment 3 2026 (Answer Guide) - DUE 15 September 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 8 pages

HED4810 Assignment 3 2026 (Answer Guide) - DUE 15 September 2026 VERIFIED AND CERTIFIED ANSWERS. WRITTEN IN REQUIRED FORMAT AND WITHIN GIVEN GUIDELINES. IT IS GOOD TO USE AS A GUIDE AND FOR REFERENCE, NEVER PLAGARIZE. Thank you and success in your academics. UNISA, 2026

Content preview

HED4810 Assignment 3 2026 (Answer Guide) - DUE 15 September
2026
VERIFIED AND CERTIFIED ANSWERS. WRITTEN IN REQUIRED FORMAT AND WITHIN
GIVEN GUIDELINES. IT IS GOOD TO USE AS A GUIDE AND FOR REFERENCE, NEVER
PLAGARIZE. Thank you and success in your academics.
UNISA, 2026



Contents
Ubuntu, Individual Rewards and Inclusive Education in South African Schools ................... 2
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 2
Understanding Akabor and Phasha's argument.......................................................................... 2
Ubuntu as an alternative foundation .............................................................................................. 4
Questioning the complete abolition of individual rewards ....................................................... 5
Towards an inclusive reward system ............................................................................................. 6
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 7
References ............................................................................................................................................. 8

, Ubuntu, Individual Rewards and Inclusive Education in South African Schools

Introduction

Inclusive education seeks to ensure that all learners participate meaningfully in
education regardless of their abilities, backgrounds or social circumstances. However,
inclusion is not achieved simply by placing diverse learners in the same classroom. It
also requires schools to examine the values, relationships and practices that determine
who participates, who is recognised and who is marginalised. Within this context,
Akabor and Phasha (2022) argue that South African schools should reconsider
competitive practices and abolish rewards for individual efforts because such rewards
can undermine inclusion. They propose an Afrocentric perspective grounded in Ubuntu,
which emphasises interconnectedness, collaboration and a sense of collective
humanity.

This essay critically engages with their argument. It argues that I broadly agree with
Akabor and Phasha's (2022) criticism of competitive, rank-based individual
rewards, but I do not support the complete abolition of all forms of individual
recognition. Individual recognition can motivate learners and acknowledge genuine
effort when it is designed carefully. The central issue, therefore, is not whether learners
should ever be rewarded individually, but whether school reward systems promote
competition at the expense of cooperation, dignity and participation. Ubuntu provides a
valuable framework for redesigning such systems so that individual achievement
contributes to collective rather than competitive success.

Understanding Akabor and Phasha's argument

Akabor and Phasha (2022) challenge the competitive culture evident in many South
African schools. They argue that schools frequently encourage learners to outperform
their peers and subsequently reward those who achieve the highest results. From an
inclusive education perspective, this practice is problematic because it defines success
comparatively: one learner succeeds because another learner performs less well. The
authors therefore question whether such a system is compatible with the principles of

Document information

Uploaded on
August 28, 2026
Number of pages
8
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$3.18

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ZaProff
3.8
(369)
Sold
2236
Followers
531
Items
2371
Last sold
9 hours ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions