• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 12 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Edf 6557 Ethics Final Practice Examination 2026 Questions With Answers Graded A

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 12 pages

EDF 6557 ETHICS FINAL PRACTICE EXAMINATION 2026 QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS GRADED A

Content preview

EDF 6557 ETHICS FINAL PRACTICE
EXAMINATION 2026 QUESTIONS
WITH ANSWERS GRADED A+

◍ TYPE 1.
Answer: Oppose the theory (Given Definition):Define specific
termsPossible Topics:-Conventionalism-Individual ethical relativism-Any of
the four versions of the golden rule-Utilitarianism-Ross' theory with Most
Stringent
◍ TYPE 2.
Answer: Support the theory (Given Definition)::Define specific
termsPossible Topics:-Conventionalism-Individual ethical relativism-Any of
the four versions of the golden rule-Utilitarianism-Ross' theory with Most
Stringent
◍ Behavior Analysts.
Answer: The Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts (Code) guides the
professional activities of _____ over whom the BACB has jurisdiction.
◍ 1) Responsibility as a Professional2) Responsibility in Practice3)
Responsibility to Clients and Stakeholders4) Responsibility to Supervisees
and Trainees5) Responsibility in Public Statements6) Responsibility in
Research.
Answer: The Standards are organized into 6 sections
◍ TYPE 3.
Answer: Given 1,2,3 Premise StatementsDefine specific termsa.
Explain-General Principle/Premise (1): Example unrelated to topicSpecific
Premise (2): Example related to topic b. Evaluate the argument (good or
bad?)-Bad: Specify which premise (1 or 2) and explain w/ example (1:

, Example not related to topic / 2: Example related to topic)Good: Example of
a possible objection for specific premise (1 or 2) (1: Example not related to
topic / 2: Example related to topic) and respond to objectionPossible
Topics:Diversity argument for affirmative action-Unfairness argument
against affirmative action-Traditional pro-life argument against
abortion-Warren's argument for abortion-Thomson's no-responsibility
argument for abortion-Thomson's no-right argument for abortion-No
difference argument against a moral obligation to vote in a political
election-Complicity argument for a moral obligation to vote in a political
election
◍ 1) Benefits Others2) Treat Others with Compassion, Dignity, and Respect3)
Behave with Integrity4) Ensure their competence.
Answer: What are the four core principles of the code?
◍ TYPE 4.
Answer: Make a 1,2,3 Premise Statements (Given Premise Outline)Define
specific termsa. Explain-General Principle/Premise (1): Example unrelated
to topicSpecific Premise (2): Example related to topic b. Evaluate the
argument (good)-Good: Example of a possible objection for specific
premise (1 or 2) (1: Example not related to topic / 2: Example related to
topic) and respond to objectionPossible Topics:-When, if ever, is affirmative
action morally acceptable?-Are you morally obligated to vote in a political
election?-A moral question based on an issue related to sports or games
(listed in the Exam Notes)Casino in-class assignment-A moral question
based on an issue related to current events (listed in the Exam Notes)
◍ Funding source availability and public record support.
Answer: Which of the following is not an example of a core ethical
principle?
◍ CONVENTIONALISM.
Answer: An action is morally right if and only if (and because and only
because) the act's society says so
◍ "The act's of society"-Conventionalism.

Document information

Uploaded on
August 26, 2026
Number of pages
12
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$17.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
FocusFile7
4.0
(27)
Sold
279
Followers
4
Items
74276
Last sold
2 hours ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions