Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 28 pages
Exam (elaborations)

ASU STP 311 Quantitative Statistics · Practice Mock Examination Mock Exam 01 Estimation & Inference|Original questions with solutions 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 28 pages

ASU · STP 311 Quantitative Statistics · Practice Mock Examination Mock Exam 01 Estimation & Inference|Original questions with solutions 2026 Deriving estimators from first principles, then stating bias, consistency, and failure modes. INSTRUCTIONS • Time allowed: 3 hours. Questions: 21. Total: 100 points. • Attempt every question. Show all algebraic steps; a correct final answer with no derivation earns partial credit only. • State any assumption you rely on, and note where an estimator is biased, inconsistent, or undefined. • Worked solutions follow each question in this booklet. Cover them until you have committed to an answer. • No calculator is required. Leave answers in closed form unless a number is explicitly requested. QUESTION PAPER Q01 [Estimation] Sign-scrambled linear model 5 pts Q02 [Estimation] Right-censored lifetimes 5 pts Q03 [Estimation] Overdispersed counts 5 pts Q04 [Estimation] Observation probability depends on the value 5 pts Q05 [Diagnostics] Regression to the mean 5 pts Q06 [Diagnostics] k = 1 nearest neighbors “fits perfectly” 5 pts Q07 [Diagnostics] Arithmetic mean overstates compounding 5 pts Q08 [Applied] Asymmetric information and a price floor 5 pts Q09 [Applied] Direction of the next tick 5 pts Q10 [Applied] Expected value of a barrier-stopped bet 5 pts Q11 [Applied] Aggregating independent alphas 5 pts Q12 [Numerical] Omitted-variable bias (numerical) 5 pts Q13 [Numerical] Shrinkage / regression to the mean (numerical) 5 pts Q14 [Distribution Theory] The coin majority-matching game 5 pts Q15 [Market Making] Price impact in a two-sided market 5 pts Q16 [Market Making] A market on the high-water mark 5 pts Q17 [Group Markets] Dollar bill serial numbers: three rounds 4 pts Q18 [Group Markets] The one liar 4 pts Q19 [Linear Algebra] The equicorrelation matrix 4 pts Q20 [Linear Algebra] Stochastic matrices and how fast a chain forgets 4 pts Q21 [Research Design] Nowcasting the weekly natural gas storage report 4 pts

Content preview

ASU · STP 311 Quantitative Statistics · Practice Mock Examination Mock Exam 01 Estimation & Inference|Original
questions with solutions 2026


ASU · STP 311
Quantitative Statistics · Practice Mock Examination



Mock Exam 01
Estimation & Inference


Deriving estimators from first principles, then stating bias, consistency, and failure modes.



INSTRUCTIONS
• Time allowed: 3 hours. Questions: 21. Total: 100 points.
• Attempt every question. Show all algebraic steps; a correct final answer with no derivation earns partial
credit only.
• State any assumption you rely on, and note where an estimator is biased, inconsistent, or undefined.
• Worked solutions follow each question in this booklet. Cover them until you have committed to an answer.
• No calculator is required. Leave answers in closed form unless a number is explicitly requested.




QUESTION PAPER
Q01 [Estimation] Sign-scrambled linear model 5 pts
Q02 [Estimation] Right-censored lifetimes 5 pts
Q03 [Estimation] Overdispersed counts 5 pts
Q04 [Estimation] Observation probability depends on the value 5 pts
Q05 [Diagnostics] Regression to the mean 5 pts
Q06 [Diagnostics] k = 1 nearest neighbors “fits perfectly” 5 pts
Q07 [Diagnostics] Arithmetic mean overstates compounding 5 pts
Q08 [Applied] Asymmetric information and a price floor 5 pts
Q09 [Applied] Direction of the next tick 5 pts
Q10 [Applied] Expected value of a barrier-stopped bet 5 pts
Q11 [Applied] Aggregating independent alphas 5 pts
Q12 [Numerical] Omitted-variable bias (numerical) 5 pts
Q13 [Numerical] Shrinkage / regression to the mean (numerical) 5 pts
Q14 [Distribution Theory] The coin majority-matching game 5 pts
Q15 [Market Making] Price impact in a two-sided market 5 pts
Q16 [Market Making] A market on the high-water mark 5 pts
Q17 [Group Markets] Dollar bill serial numbers: three rounds 4 pts
Q18 [Group Markets] The one liar 4 pts
Q19 [Linear Algebra] The equicorrelation matrix 4 pts
Q20 [Linear Algebra] Stochastic matrices and how fast a chain forgets 4 pts
Q21 [Research Design] Nowcasting the weekly natural gas storage report 4 pts

,A1. Sign-scrambled linear model

Setup.

2 2

probability 1 obability 21 , drawn independently of X and . With a constant


Derive an estimator of β.

Solution.
Try the linear estimator first. Consider fitting Y = bX + error by ordinary least squares. The OLS
setup minimizes ∑i(Yi — bXi)2; its probability limit is b⋆ = Cov(X, Y)/ Var(X). To evaluate this, first
record the moments of the sign from its definition:
E[Z] = (+1) 12 + (−1) 12 = 0, E[Z2] = (+1)2 12 + (−1)2 12 = 1.

Now expand the covariance. By Cov(X, Y) = E[XY] — E[X] E[Y] and E[X] = 0, only E[XY] matters.
Substitute Y = XZβ + ε and use linearity:

E[XY] = E[X · (XZβ + ε)] = β E[X2Z] + E[Xε].
Because X, Z, ε are mutually independent, each expectation of a product factorizes:

E[X2Z] = E[X2] E[Z] = σ2 x· 0 = 0, E[Xε] = E[X] E[ε] = 0.
Hence E[XY] = 0, so Cov(X, Y) = 0 and b⋆ = 0 for every β: the random sign averages the linear
signal to nothing. A linear fit is useless.
Find a statistic the sign cannot cancel. The obstruction was the odd power of Z; since Z2 = 1
identically, an even power is immune. Square the model and take the expectation conditional on X:
E[Y2 | X] = E (XZβ + ε)2 | X = E X2Z2β2 + 2XZβε + ε2 X .
Treat X as fixed and apply linearity, then independence of Z, ε term by term:
E[X2Z2β2 | X] = β2X2 E[Z2] = β2X2, E[2XZβε | X] = 2βX E[Z] E[ε] = 0, E[ε2 | X] = σε2.

Summing the three pieces,
E[Y2 | X] = β2X2 + σε2.
Estimator. This says the conditional mean of Y2 is a straight line in the variable X2, with slope β2 and
intercept σε2. So regress Y2 on X2 (with an intercept). By the OLS setup applied to (X2, Y2), the slope
i i i i
is q
∑ (X2 − X22)(Y2i − Y2) Côv(X ,2 Y 2) βˆ = max(β^2, 0).
β^2 = i i 2 2 = 2 ,
∑i(Xi − X ) Vâr(X )
ˆ ˆ
Properties. By the law of large numbers each sample moment converges to its population value, so
β^2 → β2 and β√→ β: co√nsistent. In finite samples β is biased low, for two reasons: the square root is
concave so E[ W] ≤ E[W] by Jensen, and the truncation at 0 raises the smallest estimates. Only
|β| is identified — the sign is absorbed into Z. If σx2 = 0 then X2 is constant, Vâr(X 2) = 0, and the
estimator is undefined. (Simulation β = 3, σε = 1.5: |βˆ| = 3.00, σ̂ ε = 1.50.)

6

, A9. Right-censored lifetimes

Setup.




or 0 if the unit was still alive at c (censored).

Derive the MLE of λ.

Solution.
Build the likelihood contribution of each unit. ∫ The exponential has density f (t) = λe−λt and

survival function S(t) = P(T > t) = e− λt (from t λe− λu du = e− λt). An observed lifetime (di = 1)
contributes its density f (yi) = λe−λyi : we know the exact value. A censored unit (di = 0) contributes
only the information “it survived past c,” i.e. the survival probability S(c) = e−λc = e−λyi (with
yi = c). Writing both cases with the indicator,
n
di 1−di
L(λ) = ∏
i=1
λe−λyi e−λyi = ∏
i
λd e−λy .
i i




Maximize the log-likelihood. The exponential factor is common to both cases, so

ℓ(λ) = log L = ∑ di log λ − λyi = ∑ di log λ − λ ∑ yi.
i i i

Differentiate and set to zero:
∑ d ∑ d
ℓ′(λ) = i i − ∑ yi = 0 =⇒ λ̂ = i i = #events observed .
λ i ∑i yi total time on test

The second derivative ℓ′′(λ) = —∑i di/λ2 < 0 confirms a maximum. Each censored unit correctly
contributes its survived time yi = c to the denominator (exposure) without adding to the numerator
(event count) — the “occurrence over exposure” estimator at the foundation of survival analysis.




14

Document information

Uploaded on
August 26, 2026
Number of pages
28
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$17.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
smartzone
3.6
(622)
Sold
3432
Followers
2298
Items
14832
Last sold
1 day ago




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions