Graduate Record Examination (GRE) – Law
School Admissions Practice Exam Questions
and Correct Answers (Verified Answers) Plus
Rationale 2027 Q&A| Instant Download Pdf
1. Although the researcher’s conclusion appeared persuasive at first,
closer examination revealed that it was based on a remarkably
______ assumption.
A. substantiated
B. tenuous
C. comprehensive
D. meticulous
E. incontrovertible
Answer: B. tenuous
Rationale: “Tenuous” means weak, questionable, or poorly supported.
The sentence contrasts an initially persuasive conclusion with a closer
examination that exposes a weakness in its underlying assumption. The
other choices generally suggest strength or careful support rather than
weakness.
, 2. The attorney’s argument was praised for being both ______ and
nuanced, avoiding the simplistic claims common in discussions of
constitutional law.
A. dogmatic
B. superficial
C. sophisticated
D. arbitrary
E. contradictory
Answer: C. sophisticated
Rationale: “Sophisticated” means complex, refined, and intellectually
developed. It fits naturally with “nuanced,” while the other options
imply rigidity, shallowness, randomness, or inconsistency.
3. The committee’s decision to revise the policy was not prompted
by a single incident but by a ______ series of complaints.
A. sporadic
B. cumulative
C. negligible
,D. hypothetical
E. isolated
Answer: B. cumulative
Rationale: “Cumulative” describes something that increases through
successive additions. A series of complaints can collectively provide
sufficient reason for policy revision, whereas “isolated” and “sporadic”
emphasize limited or irregular occurrences.
4. Choose the word that most logically completes the sentence.
The professor’s criticism was not intended to ______ the student’s
achievement but rather to identify areas where the argument could be
strengthened.
A. denigrate
B. substantiate
C. corroborate
D. augment
E. vindicate
Answer: A. denigrate
Rationale: “Denigrate” means to belittle or disparage. The sentence
indicates that the criticism was not intended to belittle the
, achievement. The remaining choices mean to support, confirm,
increase, or justify.
5. The judge’s opinion was notable for its ______ treatment of the
competing arguments; neither side was dismissed without careful
consideration.
A. partisan
B. perfunctory
C. evenhanded
D. dismissive
E. prejudicial
Answer: C. evenhanded
Rationale: “Evenhanded” means fair, impartial, and balanced. The
sentence emphasizes that both sides received careful consideration,
making “evenhanded” the most appropriate choice.
6. In the context of an argument, “equivocal” most nearly means:
A. decisive
B. ambiguous
C. irrelevant
School Admissions Practice Exam Questions
and Correct Answers (Verified Answers) Plus
Rationale 2027 Q&A| Instant Download Pdf
1. Although the researcher’s conclusion appeared persuasive at first,
closer examination revealed that it was based on a remarkably
______ assumption.
A. substantiated
B. tenuous
C. comprehensive
D. meticulous
E. incontrovertible
Answer: B. tenuous
Rationale: “Tenuous” means weak, questionable, or poorly supported.
The sentence contrasts an initially persuasive conclusion with a closer
examination that exposes a weakness in its underlying assumption. The
other choices generally suggest strength or careful support rather than
weakness.
, 2. The attorney’s argument was praised for being both ______ and
nuanced, avoiding the simplistic claims common in discussions of
constitutional law.
A. dogmatic
B. superficial
C. sophisticated
D. arbitrary
E. contradictory
Answer: C. sophisticated
Rationale: “Sophisticated” means complex, refined, and intellectually
developed. It fits naturally with “nuanced,” while the other options
imply rigidity, shallowness, randomness, or inconsistency.
3. The committee’s decision to revise the policy was not prompted
by a single incident but by a ______ series of complaints.
A. sporadic
B. cumulative
C. negligible
,D. hypothetical
E. isolated
Answer: B. cumulative
Rationale: “Cumulative” describes something that increases through
successive additions. A series of complaints can collectively provide
sufficient reason for policy revision, whereas “isolated” and “sporadic”
emphasize limited or irregular occurrences.
4. Choose the word that most logically completes the sentence.
The professor’s criticism was not intended to ______ the student’s
achievement but rather to identify areas where the argument could be
strengthened.
A. denigrate
B. substantiate
C. corroborate
D. augment
E. vindicate
Answer: A. denigrate
Rationale: “Denigrate” means to belittle or disparage. The sentence
indicates that the criticism was not intended to belittle the
, achievement. The remaining choices mean to support, confirm,
increase, or justify.
5. The judge’s opinion was notable for its ______ treatment of the
competing arguments; neither side was dismissed without careful
consideration.
A. partisan
B. perfunctory
C. evenhanded
D. dismissive
E. prejudicial
Answer: C. evenhanded
Rationale: “Evenhanded” means fair, impartial, and balanced. The
sentence emphasizes that both sides received careful consideration,
making “evenhanded” the most appropriate choice.
6. In the context of an argument, “equivocal” most nearly means:
A. decisive
B. ambiguous
C. irrelevant
