CBP ENTRANCE EXAM ACTUAL TEST PAPER QUESTIONS CORRECT ANSWERS GRADED
A PLUS
CBP Entrance Exam Study Guide Updated Practice
Questions and Answers Verified Solutions Latest
Update 2026/2027
Question:
A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' - for hire to the general public at published rates.
As a common carrier, the trucking company is liable for any cargo damage, unless the company can
show that it was not negligent. If the company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is
not liable for cargo damage. In contrast, a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking company hired by a shipper
under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo damage spelled out in the contract. A Claus
Inc. tractor- trailer, acting under common carrier authority, was in a 5-vehivle accident that damaged
its cargo. A Nichlos Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract carrier authority, was involved in the
same accident, and its cargo was also damaged. From the information given above, it can be validly
concluded that, in reference to the accident: A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not
negligent.
Answer:
C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
Question:
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting greater reliance on electronic
mail (e-mail) systems. As this usage grows, there are increasing chances of conflict between the
users' expectations of privacy and public access rights. In some investigation, access to ALL e-mail,
including those messages stored in archival files and messages outside the scope of the
investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of this, some people send messages through
e-mail that would never be said face- to-face or written formally. From the information given above,
it CANNOT be validly concluded that: A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part
of investigations have contained messages that would neve be said face-to-face B) Some messages
that people would never say face-to-face are sent in e-mail messages C) Some e-mail messages have
been requested as part of investigations D) E-mail m.
Answer:
A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part of investigations have contained
messages that would neve be said face-to-face
, Question:
Often, crimes are characterized as either "malum in se"-inherently evil-or "malum
prohibitum"-criminal because they are declared as offenses by a legislature. Murder is an example
of the former. Failing to file a tax return illustrates the later. Some jurisdictions no longer distinguish
between crimes "malum in se" and "malum prohibitum", although many still do. From the
information given above, it can be validly concluded that: A) Many jurisdictions no longer
distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and "malum prohibitum" B) Some jurisdictions still
distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and "malum prohibitum" C) Some crimes characterized
as "malum in se" are not inherently evil D) Some crimes characterized as "malum prohibitum" are
not declared by a legislature to be an offense E) Sometimes failing to file a tax return is
characterized as 'malum in se'.
Answer:
B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and "malum prohibitum"
Question:
Phyllis T. is a former Federal employee who was entitled to benefits under the Federal Employee
Compensation Act because of a job-related, disabling injury. When an eligible Federal employee
has such an injury, the benefit is determined by this test: If the beneficiary is married or has
dependents, benefits are 3/4 of the person's salary at the time of the injury; otherwise, benefits are
set at 2/3 of the salary. Phyllis T.'s benefits were 2/3 of her salary when she was injured. From the
information given above, it can be validly concluded that, when Phyllis T. was injured, she: A) Was
married but without dependents B) Was not married and had no dependents C) Was not married but
had dependents D) Was married and had dependents.
Answer:
B) Was not married and had no dependents
Question:
Despite the fact that HIV is not easily transmitted, its deadly potential requires that law enforcement
officers protect themselves from becoming infected by it. At the Callen Precinct, officers use only
disposable items for collection evidence whenever blood is present, While investigating a particular
crime scene where blood was present, Detective R.C. of the Callen Precinct used only disposable
items for collecting evidence. From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that,
when collecting evidence at a crime scene: A) Detective R.C. does not always use disposable items
when blood is present B) Whenever blood is not present, Detective R.C. does not use only
disposable items C) Detective R.C. uses only disposable items whenever blood is not present D) No
A PLUS
CBP Entrance Exam Study Guide Updated Practice
Questions and Answers Verified Solutions Latest
Update 2026/2027
Question:
A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' - for hire to the general public at published rates.
As a common carrier, the trucking company is liable for any cargo damage, unless the company can
show that it was not negligent. If the company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is
not liable for cargo damage. In contrast, a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking company hired by a shipper
under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo damage spelled out in the contract. A Claus
Inc. tractor- trailer, acting under common carrier authority, was in a 5-vehivle accident that damaged
its cargo. A Nichlos Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract carrier authority, was involved in the
same accident, and its cargo was also damaged. From the information given above, it can be validly
concluded that, in reference to the accident: A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not
negligent.
Answer:
C) If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
Question:
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting greater reliance on electronic
mail (e-mail) systems. As this usage grows, there are increasing chances of conflict between the
users' expectations of privacy and public access rights. In some investigation, access to ALL e-mail,
including those messages stored in archival files and messages outside the scope of the
investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of this, some people send messages through
e-mail that would never be said face- to-face or written formally. From the information given above,
it CANNOT be validly concluded that: A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part
of investigations have contained messages that would neve be said face-to-face B) Some messages
that people would never say face-to-face are sent in e-mail messages C) Some e-mail messages have
been requested as part of investigations D) E-mail m.
Answer:
A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part of investigations have contained
messages that would neve be said face-to-face
, Question:
Often, crimes are characterized as either "malum in se"-inherently evil-or "malum
prohibitum"-criminal because they are declared as offenses by a legislature. Murder is an example
of the former. Failing to file a tax return illustrates the later. Some jurisdictions no longer distinguish
between crimes "malum in se" and "malum prohibitum", although many still do. From the
information given above, it can be validly concluded that: A) Many jurisdictions no longer
distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and "malum prohibitum" B) Some jurisdictions still
distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and "malum prohibitum" C) Some crimes characterized
as "malum in se" are not inherently evil D) Some crimes characterized as "malum prohibitum" are
not declared by a legislature to be an offense E) Sometimes failing to file a tax return is
characterized as 'malum in se'.
Answer:
B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and "malum prohibitum"
Question:
Phyllis T. is a former Federal employee who was entitled to benefits under the Federal Employee
Compensation Act because of a job-related, disabling injury. When an eligible Federal employee
has such an injury, the benefit is determined by this test: If the beneficiary is married or has
dependents, benefits are 3/4 of the person's salary at the time of the injury; otherwise, benefits are
set at 2/3 of the salary. Phyllis T.'s benefits were 2/3 of her salary when she was injured. From the
information given above, it can be validly concluded that, when Phyllis T. was injured, she: A) Was
married but without dependents B) Was not married and had no dependents C) Was not married but
had dependents D) Was married and had dependents.
Answer:
B) Was not married and had no dependents
Question:
Despite the fact that HIV is not easily transmitted, its deadly potential requires that law enforcement
officers protect themselves from becoming infected by it. At the Callen Precinct, officers use only
disposable items for collection evidence whenever blood is present, While investigating a particular
crime scene where blood was present, Detective R.C. of the Callen Precinct used only disposable
items for collecting evidence. From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that,
when collecting evidence at a crime scene: A) Detective R.C. does not always use disposable items
when blood is present B) Whenever blood is not present, Detective R.C. does not use only
disposable items C) Detective R.C. uses only disposable items whenever blood is not present D) No
