Question 1 (1 point)
Saved
Officer Wong arrested Ahmed for robbery and proceeds to asked Ahmed questions about the robbery
without informing Ahmed of his Miranda rights, and Officer Wong subsequently obtained a full
confession. Later Detective Jefferson, having learned about what Officer Wong did, and having been
unsuccessful in getting Ahmed to confess after interrogation where the Miranda rights had been given,
arranged for undercover officer Davis to enter the jail, posing as a person who had been arrested for
robbery of a convenience store. Officer Davis asked Ahmed what he was in for, and Ahmed told Davis
all about the robbery. The prosecuting attorney wants to use both confessions at the trial.
Trustworthy and voluntary statements taken in violation of Miranda may be used to _______ as long
as the jury is properly instructed on the use of this evidence.
Question 1 options:
impeach the credibility of a defendant who testifies
prove guilt if the defendant testifies and denies committing the crime
establish the existence of the public safety exception
show that the defendant has consciousness of guilt
Question 2 (1 point)
Saved
In an interrogation situation, a suspect may have a right to counsel according to the _____
Amendment.
Question 2 options:
Fourth
Fifth
Sixth
Eighth
Question 3 (1 point)
Saved
Before Miranda, the sole test for the admissibility of a confession was
Question 3 options:
consent.
, waiver.
voluntariness.
intelligence,
Question 4 (1 point)
Saved
Officer Arnez arrested Ralph for burglary, after seeing Ralph come out of a darkened home, carrying a
big screen television and other electronics. Officer Arnez had the home on the vacation list, meaning
the homeowner had notified the police that they would be away on vacation. After handcuffing Ralph
and placing him in the back of the patrol car, Officer Arnez advised Ralph of his rights, and asked
Ralph if he would answer a few questions. Ralph acknowledges that he understands his rights, and is
willing to waive them and talk to the officer.
This waiver given by Ralph, who knows what he is doing and is sufficiently competent to waive his
rights, is a(n)
Question 4 options:
voluntary waiver.
intelligent waiver.
intelligent and voluntary waiver.
None of the answers are correct.
Question 5 (1 point)
Saved
Miranda has drawn a "bright line" rule for the admissibility of confessions by making them
automatically inadmissible unless, prior to questioning, the suspect
Question 5 options:
satisfies the voluntariness rule.
has an attorney present.
has waived the attorney-client privilege.
has been given certain warnings and waives his or her rights.
Question 6 (1 point)
Saved
Saved
Officer Wong arrested Ahmed for robbery and proceeds to asked Ahmed questions about the robbery
without informing Ahmed of his Miranda rights, and Officer Wong subsequently obtained a full
confession. Later Detective Jefferson, having learned about what Officer Wong did, and having been
unsuccessful in getting Ahmed to confess after interrogation where the Miranda rights had been given,
arranged for undercover officer Davis to enter the jail, posing as a person who had been arrested for
robbery of a convenience store. Officer Davis asked Ahmed what he was in for, and Ahmed told Davis
all about the robbery. The prosecuting attorney wants to use both confessions at the trial.
Trustworthy and voluntary statements taken in violation of Miranda may be used to _______ as long
as the jury is properly instructed on the use of this evidence.
Question 1 options:
impeach the credibility of a defendant who testifies
prove guilt if the defendant testifies and denies committing the crime
establish the existence of the public safety exception
show that the defendant has consciousness of guilt
Question 2 (1 point)
Saved
In an interrogation situation, a suspect may have a right to counsel according to the _____
Amendment.
Question 2 options:
Fourth
Fifth
Sixth
Eighth
Question 3 (1 point)
Saved
Before Miranda, the sole test for the admissibility of a confession was
Question 3 options:
consent.
, waiver.
voluntariness.
intelligence,
Question 4 (1 point)
Saved
Officer Arnez arrested Ralph for burglary, after seeing Ralph come out of a darkened home, carrying a
big screen television and other electronics. Officer Arnez had the home on the vacation list, meaning
the homeowner had notified the police that they would be away on vacation. After handcuffing Ralph
and placing him in the back of the patrol car, Officer Arnez advised Ralph of his rights, and asked
Ralph if he would answer a few questions. Ralph acknowledges that he understands his rights, and is
willing to waive them and talk to the officer.
This waiver given by Ralph, who knows what he is doing and is sufficiently competent to waive his
rights, is a(n)
Question 4 options:
voluntary waiver.
intelligent waiver.
intelligent and voluntary waiver.
None of the answers are correct.
Question 5 (1 point)
Saved
Miranda has drawn a "bright line" rule for the admissibility of confessions by making them
automatically inadmissible unless, prior to questioning, the suspect
Question 5 options:
satisfies the voluntariness rule.
has an attorney present.
has waived the attorney-client privilege.
has been given certain warnings and waives his or her rights.
Question 6 (1 point)
Saved
