JOMC 486 Brandenburg v. Ohio
Which of the following best describes the words/actions that prompted Ohio to prosecute
Brandenburg for violating the state's criminal syndicalism statute? - Answer He threatened
revengence for policies that he thought suppressed the White race.
Brandenburg was filmed at the rally of - Answer The KKK
In the Brandenburg v. Ohio decision, the Supreme Court mentioned the 1927 Whitney v.
California case. In 1927 decision, the US Supreme Court said a criminal syndicalism statute
similar to Ohio's was - Answer Constitutional
According to Supreme Court's Brandenburg v. Ohio decision, advocating violent means to effect
political change is unlawful only when - Answer It is directed to incite imminent lawless
action
Brandenburg was convicted under the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism law which prohibited - Answer
Advocacy of violence to bring about industrial/political reform
Which of the following is NOT one of the elements of the Brandenburg test? - Answer A
tendency to inspire violence or illegal action
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Answer Brandenburg won- Ohio violated right to free speech
US v. O'Brien - Answer O'Brien won- burning draft card does not violate first amendment
Texas v. Johnson - Answer Johnson won- flag burning is protected by the First Amendment
- it's symbolic speech and political speech
Reed v. Town of Gilbert - Answer Reed won- supreme court decided the town's sign code
violated the 1st amendment
- sign code was based on content
-used strict scrutiny for case
R.A.V. v. St. Paul - Answer RAV won- content based
city violated the 1st amendment
Virginia v. Black - Answer Black won- (similar to RAV) state violated 1st amendment
-cross burning is not meant to intimidate
Which of the following best describes the words/actions that prompted Ohio to prosecute
Brandenburg for violating the state's criminal syndicalism statute? - Answer He threatened
revengence for policies that he thought suppressed the White race.
Brandenburg was filmed at the rally of - Answer The KKK
In the Brandenburg v. Ohio decision, the Supreme Court mentioned the 1927 Whitney v.
California case. In 1927 decision, the US Supreme Court said a criminal syndicalism statute
similar to Ohio's was - Answer Constitutional
According to Supreme Court's Brandenburg v. Ohio decision, advocating violent means to effect
political change is unlawful only when - Answer It is directed to incite imminent lawless
action
Brandenburg was convicted under the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism law which prohibited - Answer
Advocacy of violence to bring about industrial/political reform
Which of the following is NOT one of the elements of the Brandenburg test? - Answer A
tendency to inspire violence or illegal action
Brandenburg v. Ohio - Answer Brandenburg won- Ohio violated right to free speech
US v. O'Brien - Answer O'Brien won- burning draft card does not violate first amendment
Texas v. Johnson - Answer Johnson won- flag burning is protected by the First Amendment
- it's symbolic speech and political speech
Reed v. Town of Gilbert - Answer Reed won- supreme court decided the town's sign code
violated the 1st amendment
- sign code was based on content
-used strict scrutiny for case
R.A.V. v. St. Paul - Answer RAV won- content based
city violated the 1st amendment
Virginia v. Black - Answer Black won- (similar to RAV) state violated 1st amendment
-cross burning is not meant to intimidate
