Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Molecular Cell Research - Week 1: Cytoskeleton & Microtubule Dynamics

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
22
Uploaded on
20-07-2026
Written in
2025/2026

Summary of 22 pages for the course Molecular cell research at UU

Institution
Course

Content preview

Lecture 01: Cytoskeleton

The eukaryotic cytoskeleton is a set of dynamic filamentous networks whose assembly/disassembly controls cell shape, migration, intracellular
transport and cell division. Two major dynamic systems covered here are actin filaments (F-actin) and microtubules (MTs). Both are built from
globular subunits that bind and hydrolyze nucleotides (ATP for actin, GTP for tubulin). Nucleotide hydrolysis is not required to make the polymer
but it is what makes the polymers dynamic (treadmilling / dynamic instability).

• Actin: major driver of membrane protrusions, cell migration, contractility (with myosin), and cortical stiffness. Rapid turnover allows fast
cellular shape changes.

• Microtubules: provide long-range intracellular tracks for motors (kinesin/dynein), organize the mitotic spindle during cell division, and
determine major cell polarity axes by dynamic probing of space.

• The different kinetics and regulatory proteins (nucleation factors, capping proteins, severing proteins, stabilizers) tune filament behaviour
to cellular tasks.

Structure & polarity:

• Actin:
o Monomer = G-actin (binds ATP). Polymer = two long, staggered
protofilaments forming a right-handed helix (F-actin).

o Filament is polar: barbed (plus) end grows/shrinks faster; pointed
(minus) end grows/shrinks slower.

o ATP is bound in monomers and hydrolysed after incorporation
→ ATP-actin (T form) versus ADP-actin (D form).

o Polarity can be visualized experimentally (e.g., “decoration” with myosin
S1 fragments).

• Microtubules:
o Building block = α/β tubulin heterodimer (both bind GTP; GTP on β-
tubulin is hydrolysable after polymerization; α-tubulin’s GTP is structural).

o Microtubules are hollow cylinders typically made of 13 protofilaments
(in most eukaryotic cells).

o MTs are polar: plus end (β-tubulin exposed) is the rapidly growing end;
minus end (α-tubulin exposed) is the slower end and often anchored
(e.g., at centrosome).

Kinetics: on/off rates and the critical concentration:

• Kinetic constants:
o kon (M-1 s-1) = rate constant for subunit addition
o koff (s-1) = rate constant for subunit loss

• If the plus and the minus ends are both in (“T”) form:
o Plus-end: koff is high, kon is high
o Minus-end: koff is low, kon is low

• At equilibrium (steady state): kon [subunit] = koff

• Critcal concentration (CC) for an end: CC = koff / kon
o If [subunit] > CC → net growth at that end
o If [subunit] < CC → net shrinkage at that end

• Because kon and koff differ between barbed/pointed (or plus/minus) ends, each end has different kinetic behaviour even though the
thermodynamic free-energy change per incorporation is the same.




1|Page

,Actin dynamics: nucleation, elongation, treadmilling:

• Nucleation (formation of the first oligomer) is rate-limiting for polymerization. Adding pre-formed
filament “seeds” shortens the lag and speeds up reaching steady state. Actin polymerization
occurs more rapidly in the presence of pre-formed filaments.

• Treadmilling: when [G-actin] is between the critical concentrations for ATP- and ADP-states, you
observe net addition at the barbed (+) end and net loss at the pointed (–) end.

o Mechanism: newly added subunits are ATP-bound (T form) and hydrolysis to
ADP lags behind incorporation → barbed end stays T-rich and stable, pointed
end tends to be D-rich and unstable.

o Condition for classic treadmilling: CC (T) < [actin] < CC (D)

o Plus-end: Actin-ATP – “T form” (Koff is low, Kon is high, Koff/Kon=Cc (T) is low)
o Minus-end: Actin-ADP – “D form” (Koff is high, Kon is low, Koff/Kon=Cc (D) is high)

• Functional consequence: actin networks can flow or translocate by subunit turnover without the monomers themselves moving long
distances.

• Steady state: equilibrium phase with actin filament with subunits coming on and off (no change in % actin subunits in filaments if time after
polymerization initiation becomes longer)

Microtubule dynamics: dynamic instability

• Microtubule dynamic instability is driven by GTP hydrolysis,
which induces conformational changes in protofilaments

• Order: Minus-end – (GTP)-α-tubulin – GDP-β-tubulin
– GTP-β-tubulin – Plus-end

• MTs show dynamic instability: single filaments stochastically
switch between phases of growth and rapid shrinkage
(catastrophe) and occasionally resume growth (rescue).

• GTP cap model: growing plus end is capped by GTP-β-tubulin; hydrolysis to GDP weakens lateral/longitudinal contacts and, upon loss of
the GTP cap, protofilaments splay and rapid depolymerization (catastrophe) occurs. Regaining a GTP cap allows rescue and regrowth.

• Dynamic instability underlies rapid reorganization of MT arrays (e.g., mitotic spindle assembly)

Energetics & role of nucleotide hydrolysis:

• Polymer assembly is driven mainly by favourable non-covalent interactions (hydrophobic/electrostatic) → polymerization itself is
spontaneous when [subunit] > CC

• ATP/GTP hydrolysis is not required to polymerize, but hydrolysis changes the conformation and binding affinity of incorporated subunits
→ creates kinetic asymmetry and enables dynamic behaviours (treadmilling, catastrophe/rescue).

• In other words: hydrolysis converts a thermodynamically stable polymer into a kinetically dynamic structure.

Cytoskeleton-active drugs:

• Actin-targeting (source: sponges and fungi):
o Latrunculin: depolymerizes filaments; binds actin subunits
o Cytochalasin B: depolymerizes filaments; caps filament plus ends
o Phalloidin: stabilizes filaments; binds along filaments

• Microtubules-targeting (source: plants and synthetic):
o Taxol (paclitaxel): stabilizes filaments; binds along filaments
o Nocodazole: depolymerizes filaments; binds tubulin subunits
o Colchicine: depolymerizes filaments; caps both filament ends




2|Page

, Summary:

• Cytoskeletons are dynamic because they are built of subunits, which can polymerize and depolymerize
• Polymerization of actin (ATPase) and tubulin (GTPase) does not require energy of ATP/GTP hydrolysis
• Nucleotide hydrolysis makes actin and microtubules dynamic

• The two ends of microtubules and actin filaments are structurally and kinetically different
• Nucleation is a rate-limiting step of cytoskeletal filament assembly
• Different drugs can stabilize or destabilize cytoskeletal filaments

Overview: Regulation of cytoskeletal organization & dynamics

Cytoskeletal behaviour in cells is steered by many regulatory factors that control where filaments form, how fast they grow/shrink, how they are
organized into higher-order structures, and when they are severed or stabilized.

Different cell types build distinct actin and microtubule architectures (stress fibers, lamellipodia, axonal bundles, radial centrosomal arrays, etc.)
by combining the same basic building blocks with different regulatory proteins.

Typical cellular architectures:

• Actin arrays in a migrating fibroblast:
o Lamellipodium: branched network (Arp2/3-dependent) that pushes the membrane.
o Filopodia: tight, parallel bundles that probe the environment.

o Cortex: network beneath the plasma membrane (branched/unbranched) providing stiffness.
o Stress fibers: contractile bundles (α-actinin–spaced) engaged with myosin for contractility.

• Microtubule arrays: radial centrosomal rays in fibroblasts, long sheets in muscle cells, long parallel bundles in axons/dendrites, and
specialized axonemes in cilia/flagella.

Regulating the pool of available subunits: sequestration

Cells keep total concentrations of actin and tubulin high, but regulate the available pool via binding proteins:

• Actin:
o Thymosin β4 (thymosin) sequesters free G-actin monomers preventing polymerization; binds subunits, prevents assembly
o Profilin binds actin monomers and concentrates them at sites of filament assembly; restricts actin polymerization to the plus end

• Tubulin:
o Stathmin binds tubulin dimers (subunits) and lowers their availability for MT assembly

Nucleation: defining network geometry

• Actin branching (Arp2/3 complex):
o Arp2/3 is activated by nucleation-promoting factors (NPFs) near membranes.
o Activated Arp2/3 nucleates a new filament from the side of an existing filament, producing a branch at ~70° that grows toward the
membrane → characteristic lamellipodial web.

• Microtubule nucleation (γ-TuRC): γ-tubulin ring complex templates 13 protofilaments and seeds MT growth (centrosome is rich in γ-TuRC).
• Branching MT nucleation (augmin): recruits γ-TuRC to sides of existing MTs (important in mitotic spindle amplification and in plants).

Centrosomes, centrioles and non-centrosomal nucleation:

• Centrioles: stable microtubule structures within the centrosome; cylindrical structures with 9-fold symmetry (protein: Sas-6) formed by
nine microtubule triplets (one complete + two partials); centrioles are embedded in pericentriolar material that contains γ-TuRCs.

• Non-centrosomal MT nucleation occurs at sites such as the Golgi, nuclear envelope (in muscle), and in many differentiated cells (e.g.,
neurons), enabling diverse MT architectures.

Proteins that act at filament ends:

• Actin end regulators:
o Formins: plus-end bound actin nucleation and elongation factors; interacts with profilin, accelerates actin growth at the plus end
o Capping proteins: prevent actin polymerization and depolymerization at actin plus ends (capped → growth at minus only)

• Microtubule plus end-tracking proteins (+TIPs) can accelerate growth or induce catastrophes
o EB proteins (e.g., EB3) bind the GTP-cap and mark growing MT ends.
o XMAP215 (polymerase) binds plus ends/tubulin dimers and speeds growth.
o Kinesin-13 (catastrophe factor) binds ends and promotes protofilament peeling → increases catastrophe frequency.

3|Page

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
July 20, 2026
Number of pages
22
Written in
2025/2026
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

$7.01
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
SnomStudyNotes

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
SnomStudyNotes Universiteit Utrecht
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
5
Member since
8 months
Number of followers
0
Documents
52
Last sold
2 weeks ago
SnomStudyNotes

High-quality, structured study notes for the Bachelor Biology programme at Utrecht University. Focused on clear, exam-oriented summaries of first-year, second-year, and third-year courses, with a specialisation in cellular biology, developmental biology, and neuroscience. These notes are designed to simplify complex biological concepts into well-structured, high-yield summaries to support efficient and effective exam preparation.

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions