Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 5 out of 20 pages
Exam (elaborations)

EEN3700 PROJECT 2026 |Environmental Engineering (Civil)| 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 5 out of 20 pages

This assignment has been carefully put together to give you more than just answers; it walks you through the reasoning behind each one, so you actually understand the material rather than just memorising it. Every solution has been verified for accuracy, with academic references that hold up to scrutiny. Whether you're working through it the night before a submission or using it to reinforce your understanding over time, it's built to be genuinely useful. The explanations are clear without being condescending, and the structure follows what examiners actually look for not just what sounds impressive. If you put in the effort to engage with it properly, distinction-level results are well within reach.

Content preview

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA (UNISA)
College of Science, Engineering and Technology








Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Works

Performance Under Population
Growth Pressure
Societal, Environmental and Ethical Implications


EEN3700 Project — 2026







Module Code: EEN3700

Module Name: Environmental Engineering (Civil)

Assessment: Year Project

Semester: 2026

Referencing style: OSCOLA

, Declaration




I hereby declare that the project work entitled “Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Works
Performance Under Population Growth Pressure: Societal, Environmental and Ethical Implica-
tions” is a record of an original work done by me. The results embodied in this thesis have not
been submitted to any other University or Institute for the award of any degree or diploma.




NAME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SURNAME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .




STUDENT NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .




SIGNATURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

,UNISA | EEN3700 WWTW Performance Under Population Growth



Contents


1 Introduction and Background Research 4

1.1 Description of the Wastewater Treatment Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

1.2 Catchment Area and Population Growth Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

1.3 Original Design Capacity versus Current Demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

1.4 Importance of the System to the Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5


2 Performance and Regulatory Compliance 7

2.1 Identification of Key Effluent Quality Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

2.2 Comparison with DWS General Authorisation Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

2.3 Discussion of Performance Trends and Non-Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8


3 Societal, Environmental and Ethical Implications 10

3.1 Impacts on Downstream Ecosystems and Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

3.2 Public-Health Risks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

3.3 Ethical Responsibilities of Environmental Engineers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

3.4 Consequences of Inaction or Poor Decision-Making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12


4 Engineering Judgement and Sustainable Recommendations 13

4.1 Technical Feasibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

4.2 Cost and Affordability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

4.3 Sustainability and Long-Term Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

4.4 Social Equity and Regulatory Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14


5 Personal Professional Reflection 16


Table of Legislation 17



Page 2 of 19

,UNISA | EEN3700 WWTW Performance Under Population Growth


6 References 18


References 18




Page 3 of 19

, UNISA | EEN3700 WWTW Performance Under Population Growth



1 Introduction and Background Research


1.1 Description of the Wastewater Treatment Works


The study considers a hypothetical municipal wastewater treatment works (WWTW) situ-
ated within a rapidly developing town in South Africa. The treatment works receives domestic
wastewater from residential, commercial and institutional areas before treating the wastewa-
ter to meet regulatory discharge standards. Typical wastewater treatment processes include
preliminary screening, grit removal, primary sedimentation, biological treatment using acti-
vated sludge, secondary clarification, sludge handling and final disinfection before the treated
effluent is discharged into a nearby river.1 The overall purpose of the WWTW is to remove
suspended solids, biodegradable organic matter, nutrients and disease-causing microorgan-
isms, thereby protecting receiving water resources and safeguarding public health. Effective
wastewater treatment also reduces environmental pollution and supports sustainable wa-
ter resource management, which is particularly important in water-scarce countries such as
South Africa.


1.2 Catchment Area and Population Growth Trends


The wastewater treatment works serves a municipal catchment consisting of residential sub-
urbs, schools, healthcare facilities, businesses and light industrial developments. Like many
South African municipalities, the catchment has experienced continuous population growth
resulting from urbanisation, natural population increase and rural-to-urban migration. As the
population increases, greater volumes of wastewater are generated, placing additional pres-
sure on existing treatment infrastructure. Population growth frequently exceeds the rate at
which municipal infrastructure is upgraded, causing wastewater treatment facilities to oper-
ate beyond their intended capacity. Consequently, hydraulic overloading reduces treatment
efficiency, increases the risk of untreated or partially treated effluent entering receiving water
bodies and places greater strain on maintenance resources.2

1
Department of Water and Sanitation, General Authorisation in terms of Section 39 of the National Water Act 36
of 1998 (DWS 2013).
2
Department of Water and Sanitation, Green Drop Progress Assessment Report (DWS 2022).




Page 4 of 19

Connected book
 image
Publisher: 2016 ISBN: 9781466696204 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
July 20, 2026
Number of pages
20
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$16.11

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
LectureLab
3.6
(86)
Sold
683
Followers
188
Items
1553
Last sold
1 week ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions