ILTS Principal as Instructional Leader -
Subtest 2 (196) Exam Questions With
Correct Answers
Bethel School District versus Fraser (1986) - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-Gave public
| | | | | | | | | |
school officials the authority to suspend students for speech considered to be
| | | | | | | | | | | |
lewd or indecent| |
Tinker versus Des Moines (1969) - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-1st Amendment
| | | | | | | | |
applied to public schools and school officials could not censor student speech
| | | | | | | | | | | |
unless it disrupted the educational process. Substancial disturbance.
| | | | | | |
Hazelwood versus Kuhlmeier - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-U.S. Supreme Court case
| | | | | | | | |
that determined that the First Amendment does not protect all types of student
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
speech in school | |
Morse versus Frederick - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-A student at a local high school
| | | | | | | | | | | |
hung up a banner saying "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" which advertises the use of
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
marijuana. The principal ordered that the banner be taken down and the student
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
be suspended. Result: School officials can prohibit students from promoting the
| | | | | | | | | | |
use of drugs and does not violate the student's 1st A rights. A decision was not
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
reached about whether Morse was immune to being sued, being a school official.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Case is similar to Hazelwood.
| | | | |
, Watts versus United States (1969) - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-Expressing a desire to
| | | | | | | | | | |
kill the president if drafted was constitutionally protected rhetorical hyperbole,
| | | | | | | | | |
not a threat. First amendment does not protect against TRUE THREATS.
| | | | | | | | | |
Title IX - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-This law protects people from discrimination
| | | | | | | | | |
based on sex in education programs or activities that receive federal financial
| | | | | | | | | | | |
assistance. GENDER |
New Jersey versus TLO - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-4th amendment protects against
| | | | | | | | | |
unreasonable searches, but schools can perform these searches; girl has drugs in
| | | | | | | | | | | |
her purse, school searches it and finds it, she tries to claim its unconstitutional,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Supreme Court says search is reasonable because of reasonable suspicion and
| | | | | | | | | | |
probable cause |
City of Ontario versus Quon - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-Supreme Court ruled that
| | | | | | | | | | |
the city of Ontario, CA Police Department did not violate an employee's 4th
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amendment when the chief read the employee's city pager that generated text
| | | | | | | | | | | |
messages.
Goss versus Lopez - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-Due process: Students must be given
| | | | | | | | | | |
notice of allegations & opportunity to respond
| | | | | |
Davis versus Monroe County Board of Education - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-School
| | | | | | | | | |
districts can be held liable for sexual harassment in cases of student-on-student
| | | | | | | | | | | |
harassment where school has knowledge of harassment/deliberately indifferent
| | | | | | | |
to it.
|
Subtest 2 (196) Exam Questions With
Correct Answers
Bethel School District versus Fraser (1986) - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-Gave public
| | | | | | | | | |
school officials the authority to suspend students for speech considered to be
| | | | | | | | | | | |
lewd or indecent| |
Tinker versus Des Moines (1969) - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-1st Amendment
| | | | | | | | |
applied to public schools and school officials could not censor student speech
| | | | | | | | | | | |
unless it disrupted the educational process. Substancial disturbance.
| | | | | | |
Hazelwood versus Kuhlmeier - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-U.S. Supreme Court case
| | | | | | | | |
that determined that the First Amendment does not protect all types of student
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
speech in school | |
Morse versus Frederick - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-A student at a local high school
| | | | | | | | | | | |
hung up a banner saying "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" which advertises the use of
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
marijuana. The principal ordered that the banner be taken down and the student
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
be suspended. Result: School officials can prohibit students from promoting the
| | | | | | | | | | |
use of drugs and does not violate the student's 1st A rights. A decision was not
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
reached about whether Morse was immune to being sued, being a school official.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Case is similar to Hazelwood.
| | | | |
, Watts versus United States (1969) - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-Expressing a desire to
| | | | | | | | | | |
kill the president if drafted was constitutionally protected rhetorical hyperbole,
| | | | | | | | | |
not a threat. First amendment does not protect against TRUE THREATS.
| | | | | | | | | |
Title IX - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-This law protects people from discrimination
| | | | | | | | | |
based on sex in education programs or activities that receive federal financial
| | | | | | | | | | | |
assistance. GENDER |
New Jersey versus TLO - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-4th amendment protects against
| | | | | | | | | |
unreasonable searches, but schools can perform these searches; girl has drugs in
| | | | | | | | | | | |
her purse, school searches it and finds it, she tries to claim its unconstitutional,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Supreme Court says search is reasonable because of reasonable suspicion and
| | | | | | | | | | |
probable cause |
City of Ontario versus Quon - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-Supreme Court ruled that
| | | | | | | | | | |
the city of Ontario, CA Police Department did not violate an employee's 4th
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amendment when the chief read the employee's city pager that generated text
| | | | | | | | | | | |
messages.
Goss versus Lopez - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-Due process: Students must be given
| | | | | | | | | | |
notice of allegations & opportunity to respond
| | | | | |
Davis versus Monroe County Board of Education - CORRECT ANSWER✔✔-School
| | | | | | | | | |
districts can be held liable for sexual harassment in cases of student-on-student
| | | | | | | | | | | |
harassment where school has knowledge of harassment/deliberately indifferent
| | | | | | | |
to it.
|
