Assignment 2 Semeter 2 2026
Unique number:
Due date: September 2026
Question 1
2.1 Relationship between proof and the law of evidence
Proof is the process through which a court becomes satisfied that a disputed fact
exists or does not exist. The law of evidence provides the rules that determine which
information may be presented, how it must be presented and what weight the court
may attach to it. Evidence therefore supplies the material from which proof is
established, while proof describes the conclusion reached after that material has
been assessed. Relevant and admissible evidence must be placed before the court
before a factual allegation can be accepted as proven (Joubert, 2020). The
prosecution must prove every element of a criminal charge beyond reasonable
doubt, while the accused receives the benefit of any reasonable doubt arising from
the evidence (Joubert, 2020).
, Question 1
2.1 Relationship between proof and the law of evidence
Proof is the process through which a court becomes satisfied that a disputed fact
exists or does not exist. The law of evidence provides the rules that determine which
information may be presented, how it must be presented and what weight the court
may attach to it. Evidence therefore supplies the material from which proof is
established, while proof describes the conclusion reached after that material has
been assessed. Relevant and admissible evidence must be placed before the court
before a factual allegation can be accepted as proven (Joubert, 2020). The
prosecution must prove every element of a criminal charge beyond reasonable
doubt, while the accused receives the benefit of any reasonable doubt arising from
the evidence (Joubert, 2020).
The law of evidence also protects the fairness and reliability of criminal proceedings
by excluding information that is irrelevant, unreliable, privileged or unlawfully
obtained. A court does not merely count witnesses because it evaluates credibility,
reliability and probabilities when deciding whether a fact has been proved (Joubert,
2020). Proof therefore depends on the quality and legal admissibility of the evidence
tendered, rather than the amount of information presented to the court (Joubert,
2020).
2.2 Requirements for a person to testify as an expert witness
An expert witness is permitted to express an opinion on a specialised matter when
the court requires assistance beyond ordinary knowledge and experience. The
person calling the expert must first establish that the subject falls within a recognised
field of specialised knowledge and that expert assistance will be relevant to an issue
before the court (Joubert, 2020). An expert opinion is admissible only where the
witness is better qualified than the court to draw the required conclusion from the
established facts (Joubert, 2020).
The witness must possess suitable education, training, skill or practical experience in
the relevant field. Formal qualifications are helpful, but extensive practical
experience may also establish expertise where it is directly related to the question