• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 24 pages
Exam (elaborations)

WGU D184 DESIGNING AN ASSESSMENT SYSTEM TASK 1 COMPLETE SOLUTION 2026/2027 | Rubric-Aligned Model Response | GRADED A | Pass Guaranteed

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 24 pages

Excel in WGU D184 Designing an Assessment System - Task 1 with this complete 2026/2027 updated model response. This GRADED A resource provides a rubric-aligned model response that demonstrates exactly what evaluators are looking for. The solution covers all required elements including assessment system overview, selected response items, constructed response tasks, performance assessments, rubric design, and alignment documentation. Each section is carefully crafted to meet or exceed all rubric criteria, saving you time and ensuring your submission stands out. Perfect for WGU teacher preparation students needing a clear example of a successful Task 1 submission. With our Pass Guarantee, you can submit with complete confidence. Download your complete WGU D184 Task 1 model response instantly!

Content preview

WGU D184 DESIGNING AN ASSESSMENT SYSTEM TASK 1
COMPLETE SOLUTION 2026/2027 | Rubric-Aligned Model
Response | GRADED A | Pass Guaranteed

Context & Content Area Selection

Grade Level: 7th Grade Mathematics

Content Domain: Ratios & Proportional Relationships, Expressions & Equations,
Statistics & Probability

Standards Source: Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSS-M)



Section A: Standards Selection

Selected Standards (6 complete standards):

Standard 1 - Ratios & Proportional Relationships:

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.7.RP.A.1 - Compute unit rates associated with ratios of fractions,
including ratios of lengths, areas and other quantities measured in like or different units.
For example, if a person walks 1/2 mile in each 1/4 hour, compute the unit rate as the
complex fraction ½/¼ miles per hour, equivalently 2 miles per hour. (National Governors
Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010)

Standard 2 - Ratios & Proportional Relationships:

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.7.RP.A.2.A - Decide whether two quantities are in a proportional
relationship, e.g., by testing for equivalent ratios in a table or graphing on a coordinate
plane and observing whether the graph is a straight line through the origin. (NGACBP &
CCSSO, 2010)

,Standard 3 - Ratios & Proportional Relationships:

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.7.RP.A.3 - Use proportional relationships to solve multistep ratio
and percent problems. Examples: simple interest, tax, markups and markdowns,
gratuities and commissions, fees, percent increase and decrease, percent error.
(NGACBP & CCSSO, 2010)

Standard 4 - Expressions & Equations:

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.7.EE.B.4.A - Solve word problems leading to equations of the
form px + q = r and p(x + q) = r, where p, q, and r are specific rational numbers. Solve
equations of these forms fluently. Compare an algebraic solution to an arithmetic
solution, identifying the sequence of the operations used in each approach. For example,
the perimeter of a rectangle is 54 cm. Its length is 6 cm. What is its width? (NGACBP &
CCSSO, 2010)

Standard 5 - Statistics & Probability:

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.7.SP.C.8.A - Understand that, just as with simple events, the
probability of a compound event is the fraction of outcomes in the sample space for
which the compound event occurs. (NGACBP & CCSSO, 2010)

Standard 6 - Statistics & Probability:

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.7.SP.C.8.B - Represent sample spaces for compound events
using methods such as organized lists, tables and tree diagrams. For an event
described in everyday language (e.g., "rolling double sixes"), identify the outcomes in the
sample space which compose the event. (NGACBP & CCSSO, 2010)



[MODEL RESPONSE] Rationale for Standard Selection:

, The six selected standards represent a coherent learning progression within 7th-grade
mathematics, strategically chosen to demonstrate vertical alignment within and across
domains while maintaining grade-level appropriateness per WGU rubric expectations.

Coherence & Progression Rationale:
Standards 1–3 form a logical instructional sequence within the Ratios & Proportional
Relationships domain (7.RP). Standard 7.RP.A.1 establishes foundational unit rate
computation skills, which serve as prerequisite knowledge for Standard 7.RP.A.2.A's
conceptual understanding of proportional relationships. Standard 7.RP.A.3 represents
the application apex of this progression, requiring students to synthesize unit rate and
proportional reasoning skills to solve authentic, multistep real-world problems
(Marzano, 2010). This progression mirrors the concrete-representational-abstract (CRA)
instructional model recommended for middle-grade mathematics (Witzel et al., 2003).

Cross-Domain Connections:
Standard 4 (7.EE.B.4.A) was selected to demonstrate mathematical modeling
integration. Proportional relationships (Standards 1–3) frequently generate linear
equations of the form px + q = r; thus, this standard creates explicit connections
between ratio reasoning and algebraic thinking. This selection reflects the Common
Core's emphasis on coherent mathematical connections rather than isolated skill
instruction (Schmidt & Houang, 2012).

Cognitive Demand Balance:
Standards 5–6 (7.SP.C.8.A–B) introduce probabilistic reasoning with compound events,
providing cognitive diversity through geometric probability models while maintaining
mathematical coherence via fractional representations that connect to ratio concepts in
Standards 1–3. These standards require similar sample space analysis skills as the
measurement approaches in proportional reasoning.

Grade-Level Appropriateness Justification:

Document information

Uploaded on
March 14, 2026
Number of pages
24
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$14.50

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
NURSEEXAMITY
3.4
(109)
Sold
587
Followers
275
Items
6847
Last sold
1 day ago




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions