, SUS1501 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2026 -
DUE 16 March 2026; 100% trusted, comprehensive and complete
reliable solution with clear explanation
2. EVALUATE USING KANT'S CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
3. Is the maxim above conceivable in a world ruled by the universal
law?
No, the maxim “All people will accumulate US$ 4.2 billion over the
course of their life in order to get really, really rich” is not conceivable
in a world governed by the universal law. The main reason is that the
world has limited resources, finite opportunities, and economic
constraints. Wealth at such an extreme level depends on scarcity
someone must possess much more than others for it to exist. If every
single person tried to achieve the same goal, there would not be enough
wealth or capital to satisfy everyone, and the economic system would
collapse under the strain of extreme inequality, competition, and
scarcity.
Moreover, economic and social systems rely on distribution,
cooperation, and interdependence. Universalizing this maxim would
disrupt these systems because it assumes that infinite wealth can be
accumulated individually, which is practically impossible. Applying the
maxim universally leads to a contradiction in practical reality: the very
act of universalizing it makes the goal unattainable. In Kantian terms, a
moral maxim must be logically and practically conceivable for all
rational agents; this maxim fails because its success depends on the
exclusion or failure of the majority. Therefore, while it may work for an
individual, it cannot function as a universal moral law, and is thus
inconceivable in a world ruled by the categorical imperative.
DUE 16 March 2026; 100% trusted, comprehensive and complete
reliable solution with clear explanation
2. EVALUATE USING KANT'S CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
3. Is the maxim above conceivable in a world ruled by the universal
law?
No, the maxim “All people will accumulate US$ 4.2 billion over the
course of their life in order to get really, really rich” is not conceivable
in a world governed by the universal law. The main reason is that the
world has limited resources, finite opportunities, and economic
constraints. Wealth at such an extreme level depends on scarcity
someone must possess much more than others for it to exist. If every
single person tried to achieve the same goal, there would not be enough
wealth or capital to satisfy everyone, and the economic system would
collapse under the strain of extreme inequality, competition, and
scarcity.
Moreover, economic and social systems rely on distribution,
cooperation, and interdependence. Universalizing this maxim would
disrupt these systems because it assumes that infinite wealth can be
accumulated individually, which is practically impossible. Applying the
maxim universally leads to a contradiction in practical reality: the very
act of universalizing it makes the goal unattainable. In Kantian terms, a
moral maxim must be logically and practically conceivable for all
rational agents; this maxim fails because its success depends on the
exclusion or failure of the majority. Therefore, while it may work for an
individual, it cannot function as a universal moral law, and is thus
inconceivable in a world ruled by the categorical imperative.
