UNIV 104 : English Assessment Liberty University
answers complete solutions
PART 1: COURSE OVERVIEW - UNIV 104: ENGLISH ASSESSMENTp
Course Purpose:
UNIV 104 is Liberty University’s gateway English assessment course designed to confirm
incoming students’ readiness for college-level academic writing and critical reading. It
diagnostically measures rhetorical knowledge, research fluency, argumentation skill, and
mechanical control to ensure placement into or exemption from ENGL 101/102.
Core Objectives:
1. Demonstrate understanding of the rhetorical situation—purpose, audience, context, and
genre conventions.
2. Locate, evaluate, and integrate scholarly sources using APA documentation.
3. Construct logical, evidence-based arguments free from fallacies.
4. Compose clear, cohesive academic prose with a defensible thesis and grammatical
correctness.
5. Revise writing at both global (focus, organization) and local (sentence-level) stages.
PART 2: MODULE-BY-MODULE BREAKDOWN
Module 1: Rhetorical Foundations
Key Topics: rhetorical situation (purpose, audience, context), discourse communities, academic
voice, ethos/pathos/logos, genre conventions.
Module 2: Research & Source Integration
Key Topics: Jerry Falwell Library databases, CRAAP credibility test, primary vs. secondary
sources, APA 7th in-text citations, reference-list formatting, quoting/paraphrasing/summarizing,
plagiarism avoidance.
Module 3: Argumentation & Critical Thinking
Key Topics: claim-types (fact, value, policy), Toulmin model (claim-data-warrant), inductive vs.
deductive reasoning, common fallacies, counterargument/rebuttal, synthesis matrices.
Module 4: Academic Writing & Revision
Key Topics: thesis placement and quality, MEAL paragraph structure (Main idea-Evidence-
, Analysis-Link), coherence devices (transitions, repetition, pronouns), global vs. local revision,
peer-review protocols, comma splices, subject-verb agreement, pronoun-antecedent clarity,
APA mechanics (italics, capitalization, double-spacing).
PART 3: KEY CONCEPT REVIEW & SOLUTIONS APPROACH
Thesis Statement Development
Formula: Limited subject + precise opinion + blueprint of reasons = strong thesis.
Example: “Social media (limited subject) negatively affects adolescents’ mental health (opinion)
by increasing anxiety, distorting body image, and reducing face-to-face support systems
(blueprint).”
APA Citation Scenarios
Journal article (print):
In-text: (Thompson, 2019)
Reference: Thompson, L. M. (2019). Rhetoric and faith. Journal of Christian Scholarship, 15(2),
45–59.
Website with author:
In-text: (Liberty University, 2021)
Reference: Liberty University. (2021, July 6). Academic integrity policy.
https://www.liberty.edu/academics/integrity
Logical Fallacy Identification
Straw man: Misrepresenting an opponent’s argument to refute it easily.
Ad hominem: Attacking the person rather than the claim.
False dilemma: Presenting only two choices when more exist.
Revision Strategies
Global: Re-examine thesis, paragraph unity, evidence sufficiency, overall organization.
Local: Correct grammar, punctuation, diction, APA minutiae.
Peer-review principle: Describe, evaluate, suggest—never rewrite the author’s prose.
PART 4: PRACTICE ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS & SOLUTIONS (25 Questions)
Q1: Rhetorical Situation
A student essay titled “Why Every Christian Should Study Rhetoric” is assigned to an audience of
secular composition scholars. Which rhetorical choice best adapts to the audience?
answers complete solutions
PART 1: COURSE OVERVIEW - UNIV 104: ENGLISH ASSESSMENTp
Course Purpose:
UNIV 104 is Liberty University’s gateway English assessment course designed to confirm
incoming students’ readiness for college-level academic writing and critical reading. It
diagnostically measures rhetorical knowledge, research fluency, argumentation skill, and
mechanical control to ensure placement into or exemption from ENGL 101/102.
Core Objectives:
1. Demonstrate understanding of the rhetorical situation—purpose, audience, context, and
genre conventions.
2. Locate, evaluate, and integrate scholarly sources using APA documentation.
3. Construct logical, evidence-based arguments free from fallacies.
4. Compose clear, cohesive academic prose with a defensible thesis and grammatical
correctness.
5. Revise writing at both global (focus, organization) and local (sentence-level) stages.
PART 2: MODULE-BY-MODULE BREAKDOWN
Module 1: Rhetorical Foundations
Key Topics: rhetorical situation (purpose, audience, context), discourse communities, academic
voice, ethos/pathos/logos, genre conventions.
Module 2: Research & Source Integration
Key Topics: Jerry Falwell Library databases, CRAAP credibility test, primary vs. secondary
sources, APA 7th in-text citations, reference-list formatting, quoting/paraphrasing/summarizing,
plagiarism avoidance.
Module 3: Argumentation & Critical Thinking
Key Topics: claim-types (fact, value, policy), Toulmin model (claim-data-warrant), inductive vs.
deductive reasoning, common fallacies, counterargument/rebuttal, synthesis matrices.
Module 4: Academic Writing & Revision
Key Topics: thesis placement and quality, MEAL paragraph structure (Main idea-Evidence-
, Analysis-Link), coherence devices (transitions, repetition, pronouns), global vs. local revision,
peer-review protocols, comma splices, subject-verb agreement, pronoun-antecedent clarity,
APA mechanics (italics, capitalization, double-spacing).
PART 3: KEY CONCEPT REVIEW & SOLUTIONS APPROACH
Thesis Statement Development
Formula: Limited subject + precise opinion + blueprint of reasons = strong thesis.
Example: “Social media (limited subject) negatively affects adolescents’ mental health (opinion)
by increasing anxiety, distorting body image, and reducing face-to-face support systems
(blueprint).”
APA Citation Scenarios
Journal article (print):
In-text: (Thompson, 2019)
Reference: Thompson, L. M. (2019). Rhetoric and faith. Journal of Christian Scholarship, 15(2),
45–59.
Website with author:
In-text: (Liberty University, 2021)
Reference: Liberty University. (2021, July 6). Academic integrity policy.
https://www.liberty.edu/academics/integrity
Logical Fallacy Identification
Straw man: Misrepresenting an opponent’s argument to refute it easily.
Ad hominem: Attacking the person rather than the claim.
False dilemma: Presenting only two choices when more exist.
Revision Strategies
Global: Re-examine thesis, paragraph unity, evidence sufficiency, overall organization.
Local: Correct grammar, punctuation, diction, APA minutiae.
Peer-review principle: Describe, evaluate, suggest—never rewrite the author’s prose.
PART 4: PRACTICE ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS & SOLUTIONS (25 Questions)
Q1: Rhetorical Situation
A student essay titled “Why Every Christian Should Study Rhetoric” is assigned to an audience of
secular composition scholars. Which rhetorical choice best adapts to the audience?
