Phil 347 Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Omnipotence correct answers - God can do anything that is intrinsically (non-contradictory) possible for God to do Omniscience correct answers - God knows the future - God is immutable, so foreknowledge is nonexistent > *obj*: God would "change his mind" depending on what an agent chooses to do The Kalam Cosmological Argument correct answers (1) everything that begins to exist has a *cause* (2) the universe began to exist > the number of past events is continuously augmented, ...

PHIL 347 WEEK 1 ASSIGNMENT / UPDATED VERSION 2023/2024 GRADED A+. 1 Week 1 Assignment: Journal Chamberlain University PHIL 347 lOMoARcPSD| Figures title: 2 Week 1 Assignment: Journal Critical Thinking I would define critical thinking as something which you need to think about before giving an answer. Although critical thinking is used in our everyday lives, some people might not even recognize it because they are so used to making those decisions that the muscle memory takes over....

PHIL 347 WEEK 8 ASSIGNMENT JOURNAL / UPDATED VERSION 2023/2024 GRADED A+. 1 Week 8 Journal Chamberlain School of Nursing PHIL 347: Critical Reasoning February 25, 2023 lOMoARcPSD| 2 Week 8 Journal Critical Thinking Looking back at the past eight weeks when I first started this class I can remember being very excited to learn about ways to improve the way my brain works in regards to thinking . I took Psychology the previous term, so I was also excited to see how what I learned in th...

PHIL 347 CRITICAL REASONING FINAL EXAM C QUESTIONS WITH 100% CORRECT ANSWERS| GRADED A+

Phil 347 FINAL Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Cosmological argument Argues for the idea that the universe has a beginning. This argument follows the idea that all empirical things are in a state of generation and decay and therefore the universe is material and was created. Plato's cosmological argument premises 1.) everything that begins to exists has a cause distinct from itself 2.) the universe has a beginning 3.) hence the universe has a cause distinct from itself What ...

PHIL 347 Exam 2 Complete Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ The Naive View Having a mental disorder itself implies something about one's freedom and moral responsibility The Nuanced View There is no general relationship between moral responsibility and psychopathology Moral Responsibility The philosophical term of art used to describe when it is appropriate to hold someone accountable for something morally significant that they've done Usually, this is tied to blam...

PHIL 347 WEEK 7 PROJECT ARGUITIVE PAPER / UPDATED VERSION 2023/2024 GRADED A+ CHAMBERLAIN UNIVERSITY. 1 Week 7 Course Project: Argumentative Paper Chamberlain University College of Nursing PHIL347N Critical Reasoning December 13, 2023 lOMoARcPSD| 2 Research from Koulack (2020) states, “The protests following the killing of George Floyd in the summer of 2020 led to contentious discussions and debates in many cities about policing, with some calling to ‘defund the police.’” Th...

PHIL 347 WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT JOURNAL / UPDATED VERSION 2023/2024 GRADED A+ CHAMBERLAIN UNIVERSITY. RUNNING HEAD: WEEK 2 JOURNAL 1 Week 2 Assignment: Journal PHIL 347 July 17, 2023 lOMoARcPSD| RUNNING HEAD: WEEK 2 JOURNAL 2  Important Idea Considering only the Introduction to Chapter 5, in terms of developing critical thinking and reasoning, what do you consider is the most valuable and important idea in that section? Briefly explain why you find this idea important and valuable. Wha...

PHIL 347 Final Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ What is Mackie's argument from Evil? 1. Omnipotent God exists 2. Omnibenevolent God exists 3. Evil exists What is Plantinga's aim of his free will defence To show that Mackie's premises are consistent How can you show that a set is consistent? (P,Q,R) You need a proposition S that is consistent with P & Q and in conjunction with P & Q implies R What is Plantinga's S term to for Mackie's argument to show ...

PHIL 347 Week 2 Checkpoint Quiz (Verified 2023/2024).What are the component premises are there in the following statement: "If it weren’t for how much it costs and how big it is, I’d buy that TV for our bedroom." Your Answer: The first premise of the following statement is that the TV is very expensive and the person cannot afford it. The second premise is that the TV is very big and would not fit in the bedroom of the person who wants to purchase it. Question 4 10 / 10 pts Go to t...