PHIL 347N (PHIL 347N)

Chamberlain College Nursing

Here are the best resources to pass PHIL 347N (PHIL 347N). Find PHIL 347N (PHIL 347N) study guides, notes, assignments, and much more.

All 26 results

Sort by

PHIL 347N Final Exam 2- Question And Answers
  • PHIL 347N Final Exam 2- Question And Answers

  • Exam (elaborations) • 6 pages • 2023
  • PHIL 347N Final Exam 2- Question And Answers
    (0)
  • $27.49
  • + learn more
PHIL 347N Final Exam 2- Question And Answers
  • PHIL 347N Final Exam 2- Question And Answers

  • Exam (elaborations) • 6 pages • 2023
  • PHIL 347N Final Exam 2- Question And Answers
    (0)
  • $27.49
  • + learn more
PHIL 347 Week 8 Assignment: Journal | Download To Score An A
  • PHIL 347 Week 8 Assignment: Journal | Download To Score An A

  • Other • 3 pages • 2022
  • Available in package deal
  • 1 Running head: JOURNAL WEEK 8 JOURNAL Chamberlain University PHIL347N: Critical Reasoning Critical Thinking o Go back to your very first j ournal entry – review your definition of critical thinking. After studying critical thinking for the past eight weeks, would you change your definition in any way? If yes, how and why? If no – if it was perfect – what parts of the text were best reflected in your definition? My definition about critical thinking has not changed. I still strongly believ...
    (1)
  • $10.99
  • + learn more
PHIL-347 Week 7 Discussion: What Do I Value (With Responses) | GRADED
  • PHIL-347 Week 7 Discussion: What Do I Value (With Responses) | GRADED

  • Other • 2 pages • 2022
  • Available in package deal
  • What core values would you risk your life for and freedom to defend? Could a nation going to war be appropriate in certain circumstances – or is war never an appropriate response? Does the argumen t pass the Test of Truthfulness? Show Less
    (0)
  • $10.99
  • + learn more
PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 2: Empirical Reasoning (With Responses) | GRADED
  • PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 2: Empirical Reasoning (With Responses) | GRADED

  • Other • 2 pages • 2022
  • Available in package deal
  • PHIL 347 Week 6 Discussion 2: Empirical Reasoning (With Responses) After reading and comprehending many sources, I have found that Quinn et al said that myopia was a common affliction and juven ile onset myopia is said to be believed that it is caused by a genetic and environmental factor (Guggenheim, Hill, & Yam, 2003). These types of myopia typically result from animal experiments that are indicated in certain light cycles that also affect the process of myopia 3, myopia 4, and Quinn claims th...
    (0)
  • $10.99
  • + learn more
PHIL-347 Week 5 Course Project: Annotated Bibliography and Source Evaluation (graded A)
  • PHIL-347 Week 5 Course Project: Annotated Bibliography and Source Evaluation (graded A)

  • Other • 6 pages • 2022
  • Available in package deal
  • Week 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography and Source Evaluation Chamberlain University PHIL347N- Critical Reasoning Source 1 The first source is a scholarly article titled, “7 Risks of e-cig arettes emerge by Janet Raloff written in 2014. The article is recent which still includes a lot of the harmful effects of vaping and e-cigarettes. In the article, Raloff talks about the main harmful effects that are seen in using e-cigs which are devices that dispense water vapor laced with liquid (Raloff...
    (1)
  • $10.99
  • + learn more
PHIL 347 Week 5 Assignment: Journal | GRADED
  • PHIL 347 Week 5 Assignment: Journal | GRADED

  • Other • 4 pages • 2022
  • Available in package deal
  • PHIL 347N Week 5 Assignment: Journal System 1 and System 2: System 1 depends on pertinent remembrance, cues and thinking heuristic to arrive rapidly and confidently at perceptions. Ac cording to , “System 1 produces the fast, intuitive reactions and instantaneous decisions that govern most of our lives”. To get myself though my day, I always think about my everyday functions. An example of system 1 in my personal life would be using a toothbrush to brush my teeth and I do not have to think a...
    (1)
  • $10.99
  • + learn more
PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion: Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning (With Responses) | graded A
  • PHIL 347 Week 4 Discussion: Distinguishing Inductive and Deductive Reasoning (With Responses) | graded A

  • Other • 67 pages • 2022
  • Available in package deal
  • Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 8, 9, 17 (Introduction) Lesson Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook) Click on t he following tabs to review the concepts that will be addressed in this activity: Valid Argument Structures Deductive Inductive A valid structure is the way in which an argument is put together that assures it will pass the test of logical strength. The Basic Structure of Deductive and Inductive Arguments...
    (0)
  • $10.99
  • + learn more
PHIL 347 Week 4 Assignment: Journal | Already GRADED A
  • PHIL 347 Week 4 Assignment: Journal | Already GRADED A

  • Other • 4 pages • 2022
  • Available in package deal
  • Week 4 Assignment Chamberlain University PHIL347N: Critical Reasoning Inference: Briefly discuss how the lexical definitions and connotations of "valid" and "warranted" can help us un derstand the differing purposes of deductive and inductive arguments. • Valid is something well-grounded on principles or evidence; able to withstand criticism or objection, as an argument; sound. For example, a passport is valid until it is expired. Warranted is thought to be the ingredient that separates me...
    (0)
  • $10.99
  • + learn more
PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion: Evaluating Sources (graded)
  • PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion: Evaluating Sources (graded)

  • Other • 2 pages • 2022
  • Available in package deal
  • Introduction “Everyone is entitled to their own opinions – but not their own facts.” (Daniel Patrick Moynihan, cited in Vanity Fair, 2010, para. 2) We form opinions – and make our judgme nts – based on facts we observe and values we hold. Our judgments are also influenced by the opinions of others. In the section “An Expert on Hate in America” in Chapter 6, one of the authors, Dr. Peter Facione, renders an opinion on a non-profit civil rights organization: Southern Poverty Law Cent...
    (0)
  • $10.99
  • 1x sold
  • + learn more