100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

NUR 3165 NURSING RESEARCH MODULE 4 EXAM QUESTIONS WITH CORRECT ANSWERS LATEST UPDATE 2025/2026

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
9
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
26-12-2025
Written in
2025/2026

NUR 3165 NURSING RESEARCH MODULE 4 EXAM QUESTIONS WITH CORRECT ANSWERS LATEST UPDATE 2025/2026 Sections of a Journal Article - Answers IMARD Introduction - Answers •Include why the study is important (purpose/hypothesis) •Provide a review of the relevant literature and highlight the "gaps" •Some authors provide both an Introduction AND a Background section. Methods - Answers •Include why the study is important (purpose/hypothesis) •Provide a review of the relevant literature and highlight the "gaps" •Some authors provide both an Introduction AND a Background section. Results - Answers •Statistical methods used but no discussion of what the findings mean •Qualitative studies would organize the major themes and present them here but provide more information and direct quotes in the discussion (where they make sense of them) Discussion - Answers •Discuss what the findings mean. Provide implications for practice or future research. -Discuss study limitations. Blinding - Answers •Blinding is a method used to decrease chances of bias in research studies. -->•Keeping people unaware to prevent unwitting bias •Researchers can be blind to which participants are in the intervention vs control. •Participants/subjects can be blind to which group they are in or which intervention (treatment) they are receiving. Peer reviewers for journal articles can be blinded: -The author of the manuscript does not know who is reviewing their work. -The reviewer does not know who the author of the manuscript it. Statistically Significant (P= 0.05) - Answers When authors provide statistics that are "significant" it shows that the chance of the finding (result) being due to chance alone is low. Readers can assume that the findings is probably true and if they replicate the methods in their own population, they will likely find the same result. *****Clinically significant and statistically significant are not the same thing! -Most statistics are said to be significant if they are at or below the 0.05 threshold. ---->This means that there is a 95% probability that the finding is reliable and not spurious (erroneous or due to chance). -Lower significance means that the statistical result is even less likely to be due to chance alone (more likely that it is reliable). --->Example: P < 0.01 has a higher probability of reliability Why are research articles hard to read? - Answers •Use of research jargon many readers are not familiar with. •Lack of familiarity with what statistical tests show/mean. •Authors limited by page/word limitations that prevent thorough explanations. Research Critique - Answers •Objective assessment of the strengths and limitations of a research study. •When research evidence is being assessed for use in nursing practice, the term "critical appraisal" is used instead of "critique". •After reading and critiquing a research study, readers should be able to develop an "inference" --->Conclusion that is drawn from the evidence that was presented. --->The stronger the evidence (statistics, findings), the more evidence there will be to support the desired inferences.

Show more Read less
Institution
NUR 3165
Course
NUR 3165









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
NUR 3165
Course
NUR 3165

Document information

Uploaded on
December 26, 2025
Number of pages
9
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

NUR 3165 NURSING RESEARCH MODULE 4 EXAM QUESTIONS WITH CORRECT ANSWERS
LATEST UPDATE 2025/2026

Sections of a Journal Article - Answers IMARD

Introduction - Answers •Include why the study is important (purpose/hypothesis)



•Provide a review of the relevant literature and highlight the "gaps"



•Some authors provide both an Introduction AND a Background section.

Methods - Answers •Include why the study is important

(purpose/hypothesis)



•Provide a review of the relevant literature and highlight the "gaps"



•Some authors provide both an Introduction AND a Background section.

Results - Answers •Statistical methods used but no discussion of what the findings mean



•Qualitative studies would organize the major themes and present them here but provide more
information and direct quotes in the discussion (where they make sense of them)

Discussion - Answers •Discuss what the findings mean. Provide implications for practice or
future research.

-Discuss study limitations.

Blinding - Answers •Blinding is a method used to decrease chances of bias in research studies.

-->•Keeping people unaware to prevent unwitting bias



•Researchers can be blind to which participants are in the intervention vs control.

•Participants/subjects can be blind to which group they are in or which intervention (treatment)
they are receiving.

, Peer reviewers for journal articles can be blinded:

-The author of the manuscript does not know who is reviewing their work.

-The reviewer does not know who the author of the manuscript it.

Statistically Significant (P= 0.05) - Answers When authors provide statistics that are "significant"
it shows that the chance of the finding (result) being due to chance alone is low.

Readers can assume that the findings is probably true and if they replicate the methods in their
own population, they will likely find the same result.



*****Clinically significant and statistically significant are not the same thing!



-Most statistics are said to be significant if they are at or below the 0.05 threshold.

---->This means that there is a 95% probability that the finding is reliable and not spurious
(erroneous or due to chance).



-Lower significance means that the statistical result is even less likely to be due to chance alone
(more likely that it is reliable).

--->Example:

P < 0.01 has a higher probability of reliability

Why are research articles hard to read? - Answers •Use of research jargon many readers are not
familiar with.



•Lack of familiarity with what statistical tests show/mean.



•Authors limited by page/word limitations that prevent thorough explanations.

Research Critique - Answers •Objective assessment of the strengths and limitations of a
research study.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
joshuawesonga22 Liberty University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
33
Member since
8 months
Number of followers
1
Documents
10638
Last sold
5 days ago
Tutor Wes

Hi there! I'm Tutor Wes, a dedicated tutor with a passion for sharing knowledge and helping others succeed academically. All my notes are carefully organized, detailed, and easy to understand. Whether you're preparing for exams, catching up on lectures, or looking for clear summaries, you'll find useful study materials here. Let’s succeed together!

3.3

3 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
1
2
1
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions