IRM1501 Portfolio Exam 2025 (Oct/Nov) Semester 2 - DUE 7 October 2025

IRM1501 Portfolio Exam 2025 (Fully Answered) Semester 2 - DUE 7 October 2025, IRM1501 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PORTFOLIO (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025, IRM1501 Portfolio 2025, IRM1501 Portfolio Answers 2025 , ... 5 receive . If we cannot open the document, you will receive zero. 21. Do not take pictures of your hand-written or printed pages with your smart phone and then use an app to convert these photos into a pdf document. The quality of these photos may interfere with the marking of the document. If the marker cannot read the information contained on the page, it cannot be marked. All queries regarding problems with online submissions of portfolios MUST BE DIRECTED TO: ; or . Unfortunately, your lecturers CANNOT assist you with technical or administrative challenges. PORTFPOLIO EXAM QUESTIONS QUESTION 1 Discuss the relevant aspects of the case of Social Justice Coalition and Others v Minister of Police and Others (CCT 121/21) [2022] ZACC 27; 2022 (10) BCLR 1267 (CC) (19 July 2022), which is available under ‘Additional resources’. (15 marks) QUESTION 2 With reference to case law and academic literature, explain the concepts of ubuntu and social justice. Your answer should refer to the relevant sources, and your referencing style should be consistent with the OSCOLA style guidelines. Discuss the fundamental ethical considerations or principles that are critical for establishing ethical and credible research. (15 marks) 6 QUESTION 3 Describe qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and show the differences by highlighting the nature of the data collected. (10 marks) QUESTION 4 Find the case of Edward Nathan Sonnenberg Inc v Judith Mary Hawarden (421/2023) [2024] ZASCA 90; 2024 (5) SA 9 (SCA) (10 June 2024), which is available under ‘Additional resources’. Discuss the three principles that are critical to understanding social justice. 1. the facts of this case 2. the legal question 3. the decision of the court Your essay must include footnotes in the prescribed format and referencing style, as well as a bibliography. You must consult and use at least one book, one journal article, one Act of Parliament or legislation and one court case in preparing for your essay. 5 receive . If we cannot open the document, you will receive zero. 21. Do not take pictures of your hand-written or printed pages with your smart phone and then use an app to convert these photos into a pdf document. The quality of these photos may interfere with the marking of the document. If the marker cannot read the information contained on the page, it cannot be marked. All queries regarding problems with online submissions of portfolios MUST BE DIRECTED TO: ; or . Unfortunately, your lecturers CANNOT assist you with technical or administrative challenges. PORTFPOLIO EXAM QUESTIONS QUESTION 1 Discuss the relevant aspects of the case of Social Justice Coalition and Others v Minister of Police and Others (CCT 121/21) [2022] ZACC 27; 2022 (10) BCLR 1267 (CC) (19 July 2022), which is available under ‘Additional resources’. (15 marks) QUESTION 2 With reference to case law and academic literature, explain the concepts of ubuntu and social justice. Your answer should refer to the relevant sources, and your referencing style should be consistent with the OSCOLA style guidelines. (15 marks) 6 QUESTION 3 Describe qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and show the differences by highlighting the nature of the data collected. (10 marks) QUESTION 4 Find the case of Edward Nathan Sonnenberg Inc v Judith Mary Hawarden (421/2023) [2024] ZASCA 90; 2024 (5) SA 9 (SCA) (10 June 2024), which is available under ‘Additional resources’. Write an essay about this case, covering the following aspects: 1. the facts of this case 2. the legal question 3. the decision of the court Your essay must include footnotes in the prescribed format and referencing style, as well as a bibliography. You must consult and use at least one book, one journal article, one Act of Parliament or legislation and one court case in preparing for your essay. QUESTION 1 Discuss empirical research and its components and provide examples where necessary. (15 marks) QUESTION 2 Find the case of Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR 709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April 2016) and discuss this case in the prescribed format [the facts of the case; legal question; ratio decidendi, or reasons for the decision; and finding(s)]. (15 marks) Document-based research is the preferred methodology in the legal field. What are the important aspects of document-based research methodology QUESTION 3 Discuss the case of Jafta v Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife (D204/07) [2008] ZALC 84; [2008] 10 BLLR 954 (LC); (2009) 30 ILJ 131 (LC) (1 July 2008). (10 marks) Conduct research on the constitutional right of access to healthcare services in South Africa and write an essay on the topic. In your answer, refer to relevant case law. When you refer to relevant case law, highlight the following aspects: 1. the facts of the case; 2. the legal question; 3. the court’s decision. Further, your essay must include footnotes as per the OSCOLA referencing style, as well as a bibliography. You must consult and use at least one book, one journal article, one Act of Parliament or other legislation and one court case in preparing your essay. QUESTION 4 Find the case of Potgieter v National Commissioner of the South African Police Services and Another (JS 700/05) [2008] ZALC 133; [2009] 2 BLLR 144 (LC); (2009) 30 ILJ 1322 (LC) (10 October 2008). Write an essay about this case covering the following: 1. the facts of this case 2. the legal question 3. the decision of the court Your essay must include footnotes in the prescribed format and referencing style, and a bibliography. You must consult and use at least one book; one journal article; one Act of Parliament, or legislation; and one court case in preparing for your essay. Everfresh Market Virginia (Pty) Ltd v Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd 2012 (1) SA 256 (CC) is an example of a case where the Constitutional Court applied the principles of transformative constitutionalism. Discuss this case in the prescribed format (facts, legal question, reasons for the decision or ratio decidendi and the court’s findings). If we cannot open the document, you will receive zero. 21. Do not take pictures of your hand-written or printed pages with your smart phone and then use an app to convert these photos into a pdf document. The quality of these photos may interfere with the marking of the document. If the marker cannot read the information contained on the page, it cannot be marked. All queries regarding problems with online submissions of portfolios MUST BE DIRECTED TO: ; or . Unfortunately, your lecturers CANNOT assist you with technical or administrative challenges. PORTFPOLIO EXAM QUESTIONS QUESTION 1 Discuss the relevant aspects of the case of Social Justice Coalition and Others v Minister of Police and Others (CCT 121/21) [2022] ZACC 27; 2022 (10) BCLR 1267 (CC) (19 July 2022), which is available under ‘Additional resources’. (15 marks) QUESTION 2 With reference to case law and academic literature, explain the concepts of ubuntu and social justice. Your answer should refer to the relevant sources, and your referencing style should be consistent with the OSCOLA style guidelines. Discuss the fundamental ethical considerations or principles that are critical for establishing ethical and credible research. (15 marks) 6 QUESTION 3 Describe qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and show the differences by highlighting the nature of the data collected. (10 marks) QUESTION 4 Find the case of Edward Nathan Sonnenberg Inc v Judith Mary Hawarden (421/2023) [2024] ZASCA 90; 2024 (5) SA 9 (SCA) (10 June 2024), which is available under ‘Additional resources’. Discuss the three principles that are critical to understanding social justice. 1. the facts of this case 2. the legal question 3. the decision of the court Your essay must include footnotes in the prescribed format and referencing style, as well as a bibliography. You must consult and use at least one book, one journal article, one Act of Parliament or legislation and one court case in preparing for your essay. 5 receive . If we cannot open the document, you will receive zero. 21. Do not take pictures of your hand-written or printed pages with your smart phone and then use an app to convert these photos into a pdf document. The quality of these photos may interfere with the marking of the document. If the marker cannot read the information contained on the page, it cannot be marked. All queries regarding problems with online submissions of portfolios MUST BE DIRECTED TO: ; or . Unfortunately, your lecturers CANNOT assist you with technical or administrative challenges. PORTFPOLIO EXAM QUESTIONS QUESTION 1 Discuss the relevant aspects of the case of Social Justice Coalition and Others v Minister of Police and Others (CCT 121/21) [2022] ZACC 27; 2022 (10) BCLR 1267 (CC) (19 July 2022), which is available under ‘Additional resources’. (15 marks) QUESTION 2 With reference to case law and academic literature, explain the concepts of ubuntu and social justice. Your answer should refer to the relevant sources, and your referencing style should be consistent with the OSCOLA style guidelines. (15 marks) 6 QUESTION 3 Describe qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and show the differences by highlighting the nature of the data collected. (10 marks) QUESTION 4 Find the case of Edward Nathan Sonnenberg Inc v Judith Mary Hawarden (421/2023) [2024] ZASCA 90; 2024 (5) SA 9 (SCA) (10 June 2024), which is available under ‘Additional resources’. Write an essay about this case, covering the following aspects: 1. the facts of this case 2. the legal question 3. the decision of the court Your essay must include footnotes in the prescribed format and referencing style, as well as a bibliography. You must consult and use at least one book, one journal article, one Act of Parliament or legislation and one court case in preparing for your essay. QUESTION 1 Discuss empirical research and its components and provide examples where necessary. (15 marks) QUESTION 2 Find the case of Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR 709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April 2016) and discuss this case in the prescribed format [the facts of the case; legal question; ratio decidendi, or reasons for the decision; and finding(s)]. (15 marks) Document-based research is the preferred methodology in the legal field. What are the important aspects of document-based research methodology QUESTION 3 Discuss the case of Jafta v Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife (D204/07) [2008] ZALC 84; [2008] 10 BLLR 954 (LC); (2009) 30 ILJ 131 (LC) (1 July 2008). (10 marks) Conduct research on the constitutional right of access to healthcare services in South Africa and write an essay on the topic. In your answer, refer to relevant case law. When you refer to relevant case law, highlight the following aspects: 1. the facts of the case; 2. the legal question; 3. the court’s decision. Further, your essay must include footnotes as per the OSCOLA referencing style, as well as a bibliography. You must consult and use at least one book, one journal article, one Act of Parliament or other legislation and one court case in preparing your essay. QUESTION 4 Find the case of Potgieter v National Commissioner of the South African Police Services and Another (JS 700/05) [2008] ZALC 133; [2009] 2 BLLR 144 (LC); (2009) 30 ILJ 1322 (LC) (10 October 2008). Write an essay about this case covering the following: 1. the facts of this case 2. the legal question 3. the decision of the court Your essay must include footnotes in the prescribed format and referencing style, and a bibliography. You must consult and use at least one book; one journal article; one Act of Parliament, or legislation; and one court case in preparing for your essay. Everfresh Market Virginia (Pty) Ltd v Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd 2012 (1) SA 256 (CC) is an example of a case where the Constitutional Court applied the principles of transformative constitutionalism. Discuss this case in the prescribed format (facts, legal question, reasons for the decision or ratio decidendi and the court’s findings). If we cannot open the document, you will receive zero. 21. Do not take pictures of your hand-written or printed pages with your smart phone and then use an app to convert these photos into a pdf document. The quality of these photos may interfere with the marking of the document. If the marker cannot read the information contained on the page, it cannot be marked. All queries regarding problems with online submissions of portfolios MUST BE DIRECTED TO: ; or . Unfortunately, your lecturers CANNOT assist you with technical or administrative challenges. PORTFPOLIO EXAM QUESTIONS QUESTION 1 Discuss the relevant aspects of the case of Social Justice Coalition and Others v Minister of Police and Others (CCT 121/21) [2022] ZACC 27; 2022 (10) BCLR 1267 (CC) (19 July 2022), which is available under ‘Additional resources’. (15 marks) QUESTION 2 With reference to case law and academic literature, explain the concepts of ubuntu and social justice. Your answer should refer to the relevant sources, and your referencing style should be consistent with the OSCOLA style guidelines. Discuss the fundamental ethical considerations or principles that are critical for establishing ethical and credible research. (15 marks) 6 QUESTION 3 Describe qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and show the differences by highlighting the nature of the data collected. (10 marks) QUESTION 4 Find the case of Edward Nathan Sonnenberg Inc v Judith Mary Hawarden (421/2023) [2024] ZASCA 90; 2024 (5) SA 9 (SCA) (10 June 2024), which is available under ‘Additional resources’. Discuss the three principles that are critical to understanding social justice. 1. the facts of this case 2. the legal question 3. the decision of the court Your essay must include footnotes in the prescribed format and referencing style, as well as a bibliography. You must consult and use at least one book, one journal article, one Act of Parliament or legislation and one court case in preparing for your essay. 5 receive . If we cannot open the document, you will receive zero. 21. Do not take pictures of your hand-written or printed pages with your smart phone and then use an app to convert these photos into a pdf document. The quality of these photos may interfere with the marking of the document. If the marker cannot read the information contained on the page, it cannot be marked. All queries regarding problems with online submissions of portfolios MUST BE DIRECTED TO: ; or . Unfortunately, your lecturers CANNOT assist you with technical or administrative challenges. PORTFPOLIO EXAM QUESTIONS QUESTION 1 Discuss the relevant aspects of the case of Social Justice Coalition and Others v Minister of Police and Others (CCT 121/21) [2022] ZACC 27; 2022 (10) BCLR 1267 (CC) (19 July 2022), which is available under ‘Additional resources’. (15 marks) QUESTION 2 With reference to case law and academic literature, explain the concepts of ubuntu and social justice. Your answer should refer to the relevant sources, and your referencing style should be consistent with the OSCOLA style guidelines. (15 marks) 6 QUESTION 3 Describe qualitative and quantitative research methodologies and show the differences by highlighting the nature of the data collected. (10 marks) QUESTION 4 Find the case of Edward Nathan Sonnenberg Inc v Judith Mary Hawarden (421/2023) [2024] ZASCA 90; 2024 (5) SA 9 (SCA) (10 June 2024), which is available under ‘Additional resources’. Write an essay about this case, covering the following aspects: 1. the facts of this case 2. the legal question 3. the decision of the court Your essay must include footnotes in the prescribed format and referencing style, as well as a bibliography. You must consult and use at least one book, one journal article, one Act of Parliament or legislation and one court case in preparing for your essay. QUESTION 1 Discuss empirical research and its components and provide examples where necessary. (15 marks) QUESTION 2 Find the case of Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (CCT52/15) [2016] ZACC 13; 2016 (6) BCLR 709 (CC); 2016 (4) SA 121 (CC) (26 April 2016) and discuss this case in the prescribed format [the facts of the case; legal question; ratio decidendi, or reasons for the decision; and finding(s)]. (15 marks) Document-based research is the preferred methodology in the legal field. What are the important aspects of document-based research methodology QUESTION 3 Discuss the case of Jafta v Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife (D204/07) [2008] ZALC 84; [2008] 10 BLLR 954 (LC); (2009) 30 ILJ 131 (LC) (1 July 2008). (10 marks) Conduct research on the constitutional right of access to healthcare services in South Africa and write an essay on the topic. In your answer, refer to relevant case law. When you refer to relevant case law, highlight the following aspects: 1. the facts of the case; 2. the legal question; 3. the court’s decision. Further, your essay must include footnotes as per the OSCOLA referencing style, as well as a bibliography. You must consult and use at least one book, one journal article, one Act of Parliament or other legislation and one court case in preparing your essay. QUESTION 4 Find the case of Potgieter v National Commissioner of the South African Police Services and Another (JS 700/05) [2008] ZALC 133; [2009] 2 BLLR 144 (LC); (2009) 30 ILJ 1322 (LC) (10 October 2008). Write an essay about this case covering the following: 1. the facts of this case 2. the legal question 3. the decision of the court Your essay must include footnotes in the prescribed format and referencing style, and a bibliography. You must consult and use at least one book; one journal article; one Act of Parliament, or legislation; and one court case in preparing for your essay. Everfresh Market Virginia (Pty) Ltd v Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd 2012 (1) SA 256 (CC) is an example of a case where the Constitutional Court applied the principles of transformative constitutionalism. Discuss this case in the prescribed format (facts, legal question, reasons for the decision or ratio decidendi and the court’s findings). Question 1 – Case Law / Transformative Constitutionalism Everfresh Market Virginia v Shoprite Checkers 2012 (1) SA 256 (CC) Transformative constitutionalism South Africa Constitutional Court case analysis South African contract law Good faith in contracts Ratio decidendi Everfresh v Shoprite Case summary transformative constitution Question 2 – Social Justice Principles of social justice Equality, dignity, redistribution Social justice in law Understanding social justice South Africa Social justice definitions and examples Question 3 – Research Ethics Ethical considerations in research Research ethics South Africa Principles of ethical research Consent, confidentiality, do no harm Credible research ethics Ethics in legal research Question 4 – Document-Based Research Methodology Document-based research methodology Legal research methods South Africa Primary and secondary sources Source reliability hierarchy Critical reading legal documents Search strategy legal research Referencing in law research Question 5 – Access to Healthcare Rights / Section 27 Right to access healthcare South Africa Section 27 Constitution of South Africa Treatment Action Campaign case Soobramoney v Minister of Health National Health Act 61 of 2003 Socio-economic rights adjudication Health care legislation South Africa Constitutional rights healthcare case law Judicial interpretation of health rights General Research / Legal Terms That Might Be Used South African socio-economic rights Constitutional law portfolio exam Case law analysis UNISA Legal research methodology exam OSCOLA referencing law UNISA IRM1501 portfolio questions 2025