Multistate Professional Responsibility
Examination (MPRE) Practice Exam
Questions And Correct Answers
(Verified Answers) Plus Rationales
2025|2026 Q&A | Instant Download Pdf
1. A lawyer knowingly makes a false statement of material fact to a
tribunal. Is the lawyer subject to discipline?
A. No, unless the statement concerns a client’s criminal matter
B. No, unless the false statement was made under oath
C. Yes, because a lawyer must not knowingly make false statements of
material fact or law to a tribunal
D. Yes, but only if opposing counsel reports it
Rationale: Lawyers have a duty of candor toward the tribunal, which
prohibits knowingly making false statements of material fact or law.
,2. A lawyer represents a criminal defendant. The defendant insists on
testifying falsely. What must the lawyer do?
A. Allow the testimony and not interfere
B. Withdraw immediately
C. Take reasonable remedial measures, including disclosure if necessary
D. Advise the defendant to plead guilty instead
Rationale: The lawyer must not assist perjury. If remedial measures fail,
disclosure to the tribunal may be required, even if it harms confidentiality.
3. A lawyer advertises that she is a "specialist" in tax law. She is not
certified by any organization. Is this proper?
A. Yes, because clients expect lawyers to specialize
B. No, because lawyers may not claim specialization unless certified by an
approved authority
C. Yes, if she has practiced tax law for 10 years
D. Yes, if she discloses that she is self-certified
Rationale: Lawyers cannot state or imply that they are specialists unless
certified by a recognized certifying body approved by the state.
4. A judge asks a lawyer friend for advice about an ongoing case. The
lawyer gives it. Is the lawyer subject to discipline?
A. No, because the judge initiated the conversation
B. No, because informal advice is permitted
,C. Yes, because lawyers may not communicate ex parte with judges
regarding pending matters
D. Yes, unless the lawyer is also counsel of record
Rationale: Ex parte communication with a judge about a pending case
violates rules of professional conduct.
5. A lawyer agrees to represent a client for a contingent fee in a criminal
case. Is this permissible?
A. Yes, if the fee agreement is in writing
B. Yes, if the client consents
C. Yes, if approved by the court
D. No, contingent fees in criminal cases are prohibited
Rationale: Contingent fees are not allowed in criminal or certain domestic
relations matters because they may encourage improper incentives.
6. A lawyer fails to file a client’s case before the statute of limitations
expires. Is the lawyer subject to discipline?
A. No, this is a matter of malpractice only
B. Yes, because neglect of a client matter violates the duty of diligence
C. No, unless the client suffers damages
D. No, unless the lawyer acted intentionally
Rationale: Failure to act with diligence and competence is grounds for
professional discipline even if malpractice remedies also exist.
, 7. A prosecutor fails to disclose evidence that tends to negate the
defendant’s guilt. Is this proper?
A. Yes, if the prosecutor believes the evidence is unreliable
B. No, prosecutors must disclose exculpatory evidence
C. Yes, if the defense did not request it
D. Yes, unless the evidence is admissible at trial
Rationale: Prosecutors have an ethical duty to disclose exculpatory
evidence regardless of admissibility or defense request.
8. A lawyer represents two clients whose interests are directly adverse in
unrelated matters. Is this proper?
A. Yes, if the lawyer maintains confidentiality
B. Yes, if the matters are unrelated
C. No, representing directly adverse clients is a conflict of interest
D. Yes, unless a court objects
Rationale: Representing clients with directly adverse interests is a conflict
of interest unless informed consent is obtained.
9. A client tells his lawyer that he intends to commit perjury at trial. What
may the lawyer do?
A. Nothing, because of confidentiality
Examination (MPRE) Practice Exam
Questions And Correct Answers
(Verified Answers) Plus Rationales
2025|2026 Q&A | Instant Download Pdf
1. A lawyer knowingly makes a false statement of material fact to a
tribunal. Is the lawyer subject to discipline?
A. No, unless the statement concerns a client’s criminal matter
B. No, unless the false statement was made under oath
C. Yes, because a lawyer must not knowingly make false statements of
material fact or law to a tribunal
D. Yes, but only if opposing counsel reports it
Rationale: Lawyers have a duty of candor toward the tribunal, which
prohibits knowingly making false statements of material fact or law.
,2. A lawyer represents a criminal defendant. The defendant insists on
testifying falsely. What must the lawyer do?
A. Allow the testimony and not interfere
B. Withdraw immediately
C. Take reasonable remedial measures, including disclosure if necessary
D. Advise the defendant to plead guilty instead
Rationale: The lawyer must not assist perjury. If remedial measures fail,
disclosure to the tribunal may be required, even if it harms confidentiality.
3. A lawyer advertises that she is a "specialist" in tax law. She is not
certified by any organization. Is this proper?
A. Yes, because clients expect lawyers to specialize
B. No, because lawyers may not claim specialization unless certified by an
approved authority
C. Yes, if she has practiced tax law for 10 years
D. Yes, if she discloses that she is self-certified
Rationale: Lawyers cannot state or imply that they are specialists unless
certified by a recognized certifying body approved by the state.
4. A judge asks a lawyer friend for advice about an ongoing case. The
lawyer gives it. Is the lawyer subject to discipline?
A. No, because the judge initiated the conversation
B. No, because informal advice is permitted
,C. Yes, because lawyers may not communicate ex parte with judges
regarding pending matters
D. Yes, unless the lawyer is also counsel of record
Rationale: Ex parte communication with a judge about a pending case
violates rules of professional conduct.
5. A lawyer agrees to represent a client for a contingent fee in a criminal
case. Is this permissible?
A. Yes, if the fee agreement is in writing
B. Yes, if the client consents
C. Yes, if approved by the court
D. No, contingent fees in criminal cases are prohibited
Rationale: Contingent fees are not allowed in criminal or certain domestic
relations matters because they may encourage improper incentives.
6. A lawyer fails to file a client’s case before the statute of limitations
expires. Is the lawyer subject to discipline?
A. No, this is a matter of malpractice only
B. Yes, because neglect of a client matter violates the duty of diligence
C. No, unless the client suffers damages
D. No, unless the lawyer acted intentionally
Rationale: Failure to act with diligence and competence is grounds for
professional discipline even if malpractice remedies also exist.
, 7. A prosecutor fails to disclose evidence that tends to negate the
defendant’s guilt. Is this proper?
A. Yes, if the prosecutor believes the evidence is unreliable
B. No, prosecutors must disclose exculpatory evidence
C. Yes, if the defense did not request it
D. Yes, unless the evidence is admissible at trial
Rationale: Prosecutors have an ethical duty to disclose exculpatory
evidence regardless of admissibility or defense request.
8. A lawyer represents two clients whose interests are directly adverse in
unrelated matters. Is this proper?
A. Yes, if the lawyer maintains confidentiality
B. Yes, if the matters are unrelated
C. No, representing directly adverse clients is a conflict of interest
D. Yes, unless a court objects
Rationale: Representing clients with directly adverse interests is a conflict
of interest unless informed consent is obtained.
9. A client tells his lawyer that he intends to commit perjury at trial. What
may the lawyer do?
A. Nothing, because of confidentiality
