Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 8 pages
Other

HI 255 MC2 Unit 8 Lab Assignment 3 | Latest 2025/2026 Update with complete solutions –PGU.

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 8 pages

HI 255 MC2 Unit 8 Lab Assignment 3 | Latest 2025/2026 Update with complete solutions –PGU.

Content preview

HI 255 MC2 Unit 8 Lab Assignment 3 | Latest 2025/2026 Update with complete solutions –
PGU.

Unit 8 Lab Assignment 3

ESTABLISHED PATIENT
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: The patient is a 7-year-old boy who
presents today with his mother due to jamming his finger in the door this
morning. He caught his right middle finger in the door leading to his garage.
It occurred about 40 minutes prior to his arrival at the clinic. We last saw him
6 weeks ago for his annual physical.


PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: Temperature 98.4, pulse 79, respirations 14,
blood pressure 90/60. Heart has a regular rate and rhythm. Lungs are clear
to auscultation. Abdomen is soft. The patient is alert and resting on his back
on the examination table. Examination of the right middle finger shows some
swelling and a flap of skin to the distal right middle finger that is raised.
There appears to be no involvement of the nail bed itself, no subungual
hematoma present. Distal extremity is neurovascularly intact.


RADIOGRAPHS: X-rays done on the right middle finger done at the imaging
center do not demonstrate any fracture to the distal tip. Await official report
of radiology.



PROCEDURE: The patient was taken to the procedure room. Informed
consent was obtained from the patient’s mother, and she gave permission
for laceration repair. He was placed in a supine position, and a digital block
was performed with 2 mL of 2% lidocaine. The area was then cleansed and
irrigated with copious amounts of sterile saline. The area was then draped in
a sterile fashion and three 5-0 Ethilon interrupted sutures were placed to
realign the 1-cm flap. Dressing was applied and patient tolerated it well.


ASSESSMENT: Laceration of the right middle finger



PLAN:
1. Status post repair.
2. Wound care directions were given. The patient will follow up in 7 to 10
days for suture removal or sooner if any condition worsens or problems arise.

, HISTORY: Medically appropriate

EXAMINATION: Medically appropriate

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING: Low



CAC Results:

S61.21 Laceration without foreign body of right middle finger without
2A damage to nail, initial encounter

99202 Office and outpatient E/M, new, straightforward complexity

12011 Wound repair, finger, 1.0 cm



S61.212A Laceration without foreign body of right middle finger
without damage to nail, initial encounter (CAC was correct)

99213 Office and outpatient E/M, established, low complexity (Note the first
line of the case which specified Established Patient)

12001 Wound repair, finger, 1.0 cm

DATE OF PROCEDURE: 03/07/20XX


HISTORY: This is a 59-year-old man with metastatic lung cancer who
presented for EEG in the office with a diagnosis of status epilepticus on
March 3, 20XX.


CONDITIONS: This is an 18-channel EEG done using the 10–20 system
electrode placement. During the study, the patient was not able to follow
commands and at times he groaned and yawned throughout this
examination.


FINDINGS: The EEG begins with the patient’s eyes closed and there is a
posterior dominant rhythm of 7 on the left and 7 on the right. Photic
stimulation and hyperventilation were not done. Sleep was not obtained.
There was some left temporal slowing shown in leads T5-01 and FP1-F3.
There was no epileptiform activity seen.

Document information

Uploaded on
September 3, 2025
Number of pages
8
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Other
Person
Unknown
$15.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Wiseman
3.9
(1637)
Sold
8131
Followers
3892
Items
30338
Last sold
11 hours ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions