STYLE FORMAT | PERFECT FOR LAST MINUTE REVIEW
A covered entity does NOT include
a. Healthcare providers
b. Health plans
c. Patients
d. Clearinghouses
c. Patients
What does MAC Stands for?
a. Medicare Administrative Contractor
b. Medicare Advisory Contractor
c. Medicaid Administrative Contractor
d. Medicaid Alert Contractor
a. Medicare Administrative Contractor
When are providers responsible for obtaining an ABN for a service NOT considered medically
necessary?
a. After providing a service or item to a beneficiary.
b. Prior to providing a service or item to a beneficiary.
c. After a denial has been received from Medicare.
d. During a procedure or service.
b. Prior to providing a service or item to a beneficiary
AAPC credentialed coders have proven mastery of what information?
a. Code sets
b. Evaluation and management principles
c. Documentation guidelines
d. All of the above
d. All of the above
A patient is taken to surgery for removal of a squamous cell carcinoma of the right thigh. What
is the correct diagnosis code for today's procedure?
a. C79.2
b. C79.89
,c. C44.702
d. C44.722
d. C44.722
A 14-year-old boy was thrown against the window of the car on impact. The resulting injury was
a star-shaped pattern cut to the top of his head. In the ED, the MD on call for plastic surgery was
asked to evaluate the injury and repair it. The total length of the intermediate repair was
5+4+4+5 cm (18 cm total). The star-like shape allowed the surgeon to pull the wound edges
together nicely in a natural Y-plasty in two spots. What CPT® code is reported for the repair?
a. 14041
b. 13121
c. 14040
d. 12035
d. 12035
A patient presents with a recurrent seborrheic keratosis of the left cheek. The area was marked
for a shave removal. The area was infiltrated with local anesthetic, prepped and draped in a
sterile fashion. The lesion measuring 1.8 cm was shaved using an 11-blade. Meticulous
hemostasis was achieved using light pressure. The specimen was sent for permanent pathology.
The patient tolerated the procedure well. What CPT® code is reported?
a. 11642
b. 11200
c. 11312
d. 11442
c. 11312
INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY: The patient is an 82-year-old male with biopsy-proven basal cell
carcinoma of his right lower eyelid extending to the upper part of the cheek. I marked the area
for rhomboidal excision and I drew my planned rhomboid flap. The patient observed these
markings in a mirror, he understood the surgery and agreed on the location and we proceeded.
DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The area was infiltrated with local anesthetic. The face was
prepped and draped in sterile fashion. I excised the lesion as drawn into the subcutaneous fat.
Hemostasis was achieved using Bovie cautery. Modified Mohs analysis showed the margin to be
clear. I incised the rhomboid flap as drawn and elevated the flap with a full-thickness of
subcutaneous fat. Hemostasis was achieved in the donor site, the Bovie cautery was not used,
hand held cautery was used. The flap was rotated into the defect. The donor site was closed and
flap inset in layers using 5-0 Monocryl and 6-0 Prolene. The patient tolerated the procedure
well. The total site measured 1.3 cm x 2.7 cm.
, What CPT® code(s) should be reported?
a. 14040, 14060
b. 14060, 11643
c. 14060
d. 11643
c. 14060
Operative Report
PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Congenital left breast deformity.
POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Congenital left breast deformity.
PROCEDURE PERFORMED: Placement of left breast implant using mentor catalog #, lot #, serial
#, 425 cc smooth round moderate profile implant filled with 475 cc of normal saline for breast
reconstruction.
INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY: The patient is a 34 year-old female who approximately 15 to 16
years ago had a left breast implant placed for breast reconstruction for her congenital deformity
of the left breast. This implant ruptured and in late September 20XX, I performed a
capsulectomy and exchanged her ruptured implant for a new implant. About a week after
surgery the patient developed an infection. Due to the infection, her implant had to be
removed. The patient's infection has completely resolved and she is now ready to have her
implant replaced. In the preoperative holding area, I marked her for the ideal position of this
implant and performed a breast exam not showing a mass in either breast and no mass in
axillae and we proceeded. We discussed with the patient that even though her original implant
was placed in sub glandular position I felt it would be beneficial to place the implant behind her
pectoralis major muscle in submuscular position today. The patient agreed and we proceeded.
DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was given 1 g of IV Vancomycin. The patient was
taken to the operating room; general anesthesia was induced and bilateral pneumatic
compression stockings were worn throughout the procedure. A lower body Bair Hugger was
placed. Both arms were secured to padded arm boards using Kerlix rolls. The neck, chest,
axillae, and upper abdomen were prepped and draped in sterile fashion. I began by incising the
central portion of her previous scar. I dissected down to the pectoralis major muscle. A
submuscular plane was developed through a lateral approach and the inferior and medial origin
of the muscle was partially divided using the Bovie cautery. Meticulous hemostasis was
achieved using Bovie cautery. There were no signs of infection nor were there any pockets of
seroma fluid or hematoma. The wound was carefully inspected. Meticulous hemostasis was
achieved. Gloves were changed. The implant was opened and air was evacuated. It was placed