Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 8 pages
Exam (elaborations)

EXP3604 EXAM 4 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 8 pages

EXP3604 EXAM 4 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Content preview

EXP3604 EXAM 4 QUESTIONS AND
ANSWERS
Deductive reasoning - -you begin with some specific premises that are true,
and you need to judge whether those premises allow you to draw a particular
conclusion, based on the principles of logic

- Conditional reasoning task (Propositional reasoning task) - -describes the
relationship between conditions. Here's a typical conditional reasoning task:
If a child is allergic to peanuts, then eating peanuts produces a breathing
problem. A child has a breathing problem. Therefore, this child has eaten
peanuts.

- Syllogism - -consists of two statements that we must assume to be true,
plus a conclusion. Syllogisms refer to quantities, so they use the words all,
none, some, and other similar terms. Here's a typical syllogism: Some
psychology majors are friendly people. Some friendly people are concerned
about poverty. Therefore, some psychology majors are concerned about
poverty.

- Propositional calculus - -which is a system for categorizing the four kinds
of reasoning used in analyzing propositions or statements.

- Propositions - -statements

- antecedent - -refers to the first proposition or statement; the antecedent
is contained in the "if..." part of the sentence.

- Consequent - -refers to the proposition that comes second; it is the
consequence. The consequent is contained in the "then..." part of the
sentence.

- Affirming the antecedent - -it means that you say that the "if..." part of the
sentence is true. As shown in the upper-left corner of Table 12.1, this kind of
reasoning leads to a valid, or correct, conclusion.

- Affirming the consequent - -means that you say that the "then..." part of
the sentence is true. This kind of reasoning leads to an invalid conclusion.

- Denying the Antecedent - -means that you say that the"if..."part of the
sentence is false. Denying the antecedent also leads to an invalid conclusion

- Denying the consequent - -means that you say that the "then..." part of
the sentence is false.

, - Dual-process theory - -which distinguishes between two types of cognitive
processing

- type 1 processing - -is fast and automatic; it requires little conscious
attention. For example, we use Type 1 processing during depth perception,
recognition of facial expression, and automatic stereotyping

- type 2 processing - -is relatively slow and controlled. It requires focused
attention, and it is typically more accurate.For example, we use Type 2
processing when we think of exceptions to a general rule, when we realize
that we made a stereotyped response, and when we acknowledge that our
Type 1 response may have been incorrect.

- Belief Bias effect - -occurs in reasoning when people make judgments
based on prior beliefs and general knowledge, rather than on the rules of
logic. In general, people make errors when the logic of a reasoning problem
conflicts with their background knowledge

- Confirmation Bias - -they would rather try to conform or support a
hypothesis than try to disprove it

- Differentiate between conditional reasoning and syllogism. Think of
examples for each - -conditional reasoning is an if then statement while a
syllogism is a statement with words such as "all, none or some"

- "if I study for my exam, then I will get a good grade." Which type of
deductive reasoning is this?
Identify the antecedent and the consequent. - -conditional reasoning
if I study for my exam- antecedent
then i will get a good grade- consequent

- "He is a golden retriever, therefore he is a dog." Try to create a
propositional calculus for the
previous statement where you: affirm the antecedent, affirm the consequent,
deny the
antecedent, and deny the consequent. Think about which are valid and
which are invalid. - -Affirm the antecedent: This is a golden retriever;
therefore this is a dog
Affirm the consequent: This is a dog; therefore this is not a golden retriever
Deny the antecedent: This is not a golden retriever; therefore this is not a
dog
Deny the consequent: This is not a dog; therefore this is not a golden
retriever

Document information

Uploaded on
June 28, 2025
Number of pages
8
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$12.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
AccurateScores
3.7
(122)
Sold
587
Followers
336
Items
15249
Last sold
1 week ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions