Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 4 pages
Exam (elaborations)

NAMSS Certification Exam Questions With Correct Answers

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 4 pages

SMDA - ANSWER -Safe Medical Device Act of 1990 HCQIA - ANSWER -Provides immunity from liability for damages from good-faith peer review Title 42 - ANSWER -The Public Health and Welfare Conditions of Participation - ANSWER -Federal regulations relating to Medicare and Medicaid The Federal Register - ANSWER -Contains details of proposed and recently passed federal regulations and Presidential executive orders Boyd v Albert Einstein - ANSWER -Doctrine of Ostensible Agency - HMO found liable in patient's death. Chest perforation during breast biopsy, chest pain/MI six weeks later. Elam v CollegePark - ANSWER -Doctrine of Corporate Negligence - Med Records had information on many lawsuits agains podiatrist Patrick v Burget - ANSWER -Anticompetitive Peer Review - Led to development of HCQIA Gonzales v Nork & Mercy Hospital - ANSWER -Hospitals owe patients a duty of care - laminectomy, negligently performed. MD had history of unnecessary or negligent surgeries Webman v Little Company of Mary - ANSWER -Duty to credential - application denied when physician refused to authorize prior hospital to release information. Mahmoodian v United - ANSWER -Disruptive behavior - hospital can revoke otherwise competent physician's privileges when disruptive behavior adversely affects patient care. Darling v Charleston - ANSWER -End of Doctrine of charitable immunity - Patient lost leg due to improper casting. Hospitals are independently responsible for monitoring and supervising care provided. Mathews v Lancaster - ANSWER -HCQIA - Burden on physician to prove bad faith peer review. Committee including competitors found sub-standard care by Surgeon Bell v Sharp - ANSWER -Negligent Credentialing - Hospital liable for failure to request data from another hospital regarding its summary suspension of practitioner. Hongsathavij v Qeen of Angels - ANSWER -Governing Body is ultimate authority - Board overturned hearing committee recommendation to reinstate call panel membership. Osooki v Fountain Valley - ANSWER -Failure to disclose - Ophthalmologist did not disclose all prior hospital affiliations on application.

Content preview

NAMSS Certification Exam Questions
With Correct Answers
AHRQ - Agency for Healthcare Research and Qualtiy - ANSWER -An agency within
DHHS established in 1989 to improve quality, appropriateness and effectiveness of US
Healthcare

AHRQ - ANSWER -Agency for Healthcare Research and Qualtiy 1989

Medicare Program - ANSWER -Established by an amendment to the Social Security Act
in 1965

SMDA - ANSWER -Safe Medical Device Act of 1990

HCQIA - ANSWER -Provides immunity from liability for damages from good-faith peer
review

Title 42 - ANSWER -The Public Health and Welfare

Conditions of Participation - ANSWER -Federal regulations relating to Medicare and
Medicaid

The Federal Register - ANSWER -Contains details of proposed and recently passed
federal regulations and Presidential executive orders

Boyd v Albert Einstein - ANSWER -Doctrine of Ostensible Agency - HMO found liable in
patient's death. Chest perforation during breast biopsy, chest pain/MI six weeks later.

Elam v CollegePark - ANSWER -Doctrine of Corporate Negligence - Med Records had
information on many lawsuits agains podiatrist

Patrick v Burget - ANSWER -Anticompetitive Peer Review - Led to development of
HCQIA

Gonzales v Nork & Mercy Hospital - ANSWER -Hospitals owe patients a duty of care -
laminectomy, negligently performed. MD had history of unnecessary or negligent
surgeries

Webman v Little Company of Mary - ANSWER -Duty to credential - application denied
when physician refused to authorize prior hospital to release information.

Document information

Uploaded on
May 15, 2025
Number of pages
4
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$12.09

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
IMORA
4.4
(70)
Sold
214
Followers
77
Items
5091
Last sold
4 weeks ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions