PSY 368 FINAL EXAM AND PRACTICE EXAM
COMPLETE 120 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT
DETAILED ANSWERS|ALREADYGRADED A+
Save
Terms in this set (123)
- analytic: needs to address threat, vulnerability, and
consequences
what three characteristics
should a terror alert - deliberative: need to include transparency in
include, according to values/ judgments. discussions
Willis ( 2006) ?
- practical: multiple data collection & analysis
procedures
- provide government, authorities, & public
information about current terrorism risk
What was the stated
- create common lanugage for discussing risk
purpose of the HSAS ?
- facilitate decision- making in private & public
sectors
green:
how did the HSAS
- low risk of terrorist attacks
convey terrorism threat
- low threat
information? what were
- refine & organize procedures for potential terrorist
the levels of green, and
attacks
what were the
e.g. emergency plans, shelters, first aid/ CRP
recommended actions at
courses, etc.
each level?
never use this
, - general risk of terrorist attacks
- guarded threat
what were the levels of
- review & update emergency responses, provide
Blue
public with helpful info.
- never use this
- significant risk of terrorist attacks
what were the levels of - elevated threat( see more govt. action)
Yellow - increased surveillance of key locations, coordinate
emergency responses
- high level
- close collaboration between federal/ state/ local
law enforcement ( and military) a prep for quick
what were the levels of action
organge - extra caution at public events, consider
alternatives
- travel warnings ( delays & restrictions)
- spent a lot of time at this level
- severe level
what were the levels of - emergency personnel dispatched to key locations,
red monitoring of transportation readiness to close
down public/ govt. facilities
what are the advantages - well-intentioned ( warn the unsuspecting)
of the HSAS - simple to understand
- yellow to orange -> increased physiological
arousal, anxiety, depression
- mentally ill, disabled, african Americans, latino,
Chinese americans, Korean Americans, non-US
citizen all perceived higher risk levels than white,
what were the
healthy controls
disadvantages of the
- overstimulated threat-> stronger physiological/
HSAS
psychosocial reactions -> avoidance behaviors
- chronic fear & anxiety -> more chronic medicate
conditions, cardiac events, more substance abuse
- lots of negative health outcomes, especially for
some population
, what is an National communicate gender terrorism-related info
Terrorism Advisory a. not necessarily a direct threat to US, but info that
System ( NTAS) bulletin may be helpful to law enforcement, etc
- specific, creditable information about a terrorist
threat against the US
- info about threat, targeted geographic region,
What is an NTAS alert ? mode of transportation, infrastructure potentially
affected, etc
- steps for individuals and communities to protect
themselves, prevent/ mitigate/ respond to threat
elevated alert: credible threat, but only general info.
what is the difference
about timing, target, etc.
between an elevated
alert and an imminent
imminent alert: credible, specific threat info. and
alert?
believed to be impending
fear: appraisals of uncertainty, situational control (
How do fear and anger negative)
differ when it comes to
risk appraisal? anger: appraisals of certainty, individual control (
positive)
- anger= most dominant emotion
- men more optimistic than women
- anger -> lower risk estimate-> fewer plans for
responding to future attacks ( more support for
What do these different vengeful deportation policy, less support for
effects on risk appraisal conciliatory policy
predict about people's
counterterrorism - fear-> higher risk estimate-＞ more plans for
preferences? responding to future attacks ( less support for
vengeful deportation policy, more support for
conciliatory policy)
- anger triggered optimism, while fear triggered
pessimism
COMPLETE 120 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT
DETAILED ANSWERS|ALREADYGRADED A+
Save
Terms in this set (123)
- analytic: needs to address threat, vulnerability, and
consequences
what three characteristics
should a terror alert - deliberative: need to include transparency in
include, according to values/ judgments. discussions
Willis ( 2006) ?
- practical: multiple data collection & analysis
procedures
- provide government, authorities, & public
information about current terrorism risk
What was the stated
- create common lanugage for discussing risk
purpose of the HSAS ?
- facilitate decision- making in private & public
sectors
green:
how did the HSAS
- low risk of terrorist attacks
convey terrorism threat
- low threat
information? what were
- refine & organize procedures for potential terrorist
the levels of green, and
attacks
what were the
e.g. emergency plans, shelters, first aid/ CRP
recommended actions at
courses, etc.
each level?
never use this
, - general risk of terrorist attacks
- guarded threat
what were the levels of
- review & update emergency responses, provide
Blue
public with helpful info.
- never use this
- significant risk of terrorist attacks
what were the levels of - elevated threat( see more govt. action)
Yellow - increased surveillance of key locations, coordinate
emergency responses
- high level
- close collaboration between federal/ state/ local
law enforcement ( and military) a prep for quick
what were the levels of action
organge - extra caution at public events, consider
alternatives
- travel warnings ( delays & restrictions)
- spent a lot of time at this level
- severe level
what were the levels of - emergency personnel dispatched to key locations,
red monitoring of transportation readiness to close
down public/ govt. facilities
what are the advantages - well-intentioned ( warn the unsuspecting)
of the HSAS - simple to understand
- yellow to orange -> increased physiological
arousal, anxiety, depression
- mentally ill, disabled, african Americans, latino,
Chinese americans, Korean Americans, non-US
citizen all perceived higher risk levels than white,
what were the
healthy controls
disadvantages of the
- overstimulated threat-> stronger physiological/
HSAS
psychosocial reactions -> avoidance behaviors
- chronic fear & anxiety -> more chronic medicate
conditions, cardiac events, more substance abuse
- lots of negative health outcomes, especially for
some population
, what is an National communicate gender terrorism-related info
Terrorism Advisory a. not necessarily a direct threat to US, but info that
System ( NTAS) bulletin may be helpful to law enforcement, etc
- specific, creditable information about a terrorist
threat against the US
- info about threat, targeted geographic region,
What is an NTAS alert ? mode of transportation, infrastructure potentially
affected, etc
- steps for individuals and communities to protect
themselves, prevent/ mitigate/ respond to threat
elevated alert: credible threat, but only general info.
what is the difference
about timing, target, etc.
between an elevated
alert and an imminent
imminent alert: credible, specific threat info. and
alert?
believed to be impending
fear: appraisals of uncertainty, situational control (
How do fear and anger negative)
differ when it comes to
risk appraisal? anger: appraisals of certainty, individual control (
positive)
- anger= most dominant emotion
- men more optimistic than women
- anger -> lower risk estimate-> fewer plans for
responding to future attacks ( more support for
What do these different vengeful deportation policy, less support for
effects on risk appraisal conciliatory policy
predict about people's
counterterrorism - fear-> higher risk estimate-＞ more plans for
preferences? responding to future attacks ( less support for
vengeful deportation policy, more support for
conciliatory policy)
- anger triggered optimism, while fear triggered
pessimism
