CLEET LAW
Title 10 - ANS -Children and juvenile code
Title 21 - ANS -Crimes and punishment
Title 22 - ANS -Criminal procedures
Title 37 - ANS -Intoxicating liquors
Title 47 - ANS -Traffic
Title 63 - ANS -Public health and safety
Expose facto law - ANS -Law must declare given conduct criminal before that conduct takes
place
Mala in se - ANS -Crimes that are wrong in and of themselves morally wrong inherently evil
against; the offense are against the conscience.
mala prohibita - ANS -offenses prohibited by law but not wrong in themselves
3 main factors that influenced criminal jurisdiction. - ANS -1. Impact of sovereign states
2. Plemenary power of congress
3. US Supreme Court interpretations of Indian law
4th Amendment - ANS -Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures
5th Amendment - ANS -No forced self incrimination. Right to remain silent
6th Amendment - ANS -Right to a speedy trial. Right to council
8th Amendment - ANS -cruel and unusual punishment
14th Amendment - ANS -Declares that all persons born in the U.S. are citizens and are
guaranteed equal protection of the laws. Due process
3 branches of government - ANS -Executive, Legislative, Judicial
Levels of Proof - ANS -Mere suspicion, reasonable suspicion, P/C, beyond a reasonable doubt.
Clear and conveying
, Misdemeanor - ANS -A fine of $500 or 1 year in county jail
Felony - ANS -Fine up to 1,000 or up to 2 years in prison
Larceny - ANS -theft of personal property
Robbery 1st Degree - ANS -Inflicts bodily harm
Robbery 2nd Degree - ANS -Wrongful taking of personal property by fraud, or stealth to deprive
another thereof
Probable cause - ANS -reasonable grounds (for making a search, pressing a charge, etc.).
Articulable facts that would make a reasonable person believe a crime has been or is gonna be
committed.
grand larceny - ANS -When property is above 1,000 but not more than 2,500
Weeks v. US - ANS -Established exclusionary rule, evidence gotten without a warrant isn't
admissable in a federal court
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. US - ANS -fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. This was the Genesis
case of this doctrine that decided that once evidence is shown to be illegally obtained, all other
evidence stemming from the illegal evidence is equally unusable
Graham v. Connor - ANS -Case that wrote out the amount of force an officer could use
Tennessee v. Garner (1985) - ANS -Use of deadly force to prevent escape of a fleeing suspect
if it is belived that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the
officer or others.
Elkins v. U.S. 1960 - ANS -a US Supreme Court decision that held the "silver platter doctrine",
which allowed federal prosecutors to use evidence illegally gathered by state police, to be a
violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Mapp v. Ohio - ANS -Exclusionary rule applies to all states. 4th amendment protection.
Miranda v. Arizona - ANS -Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their
right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning
by police.
Municipal court of record - ANS -Must have population of at least 65,000
May provide jury trials
May fine up to $12000
Title 10 - ANS -Children and juvenile code
Title 21 - ANS -Crimes and punishment
Title 22 - ANS -Criminal procedures
Title 37 - ANS -Intoxicating liquors
Title 47 - ANS -Traffic
Title 63 - ANS -Public health and safety
Expose facto law - ANS -Law must declare given conduct criminal before that conduct takes
place
Mala in se - ANS -Crimes that are wrong in and of themselves morally wrong inherently evil
against; the offense are against the conscience.
mala prohibita - ANS -offenses prohibited by law but not wrong in themselves
3 main factors that influenced criminal jurisdiction. - ANS -1. Impact of sovereign states
2. Plemenary power of congress
3. US Supreme Court interpretations of Indian law
4th Amendment - ANS -Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures
5th Amendment - ANS -No forced self incrimination. Right to remain silent
6th Amendment - ANS -Right to a speedy trial. Right to council
8th Amendment - ANS -cruel and unusual punishment
14th Amendment - ANS -Declares that all persons born in the U.S. are citizens and are
guaranteed equal protection of the laws. Due process
3 branches of government - ANS -Executive, Legislative, Judicial
Levels of Proof - ANS -Mere suspicion, reasonable suspicion, P/C, beyond a reasonable doubt.
Clear and conveying
, Misdemeanor - ANS -A fine of $500 or 1 year in county jail
Felony - ANS -Fine up to 1,000 or up to 2 years in prison
Larceny - ANS -theft of personal property
Robbery 1st Degree - ANS -Inflicts bodily harm
Robbery 2nd Degree - ANS -Wrongful taking of personal property by fraud, or stealth to deprive
another thereof
Probable cause - ANS -reasonable grounds (for making a search, pressing a charge, etc.).
Articulable facts that would make a reasonable person believe a crime has been or is gonna be
committed.
grand larceny - ANS -When property is above 1,000 but not more than 2,500
Weeks v. US - ANS -Established exclusionary rule, evidence gotten without a warrant isn't
admissable in a federal court
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. US - ANS -fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. This was the Genesis
case of this doctrine that decided that once evidence is shown to be illegally obtained, all other
evidence stemming from the illegal evidence is equally unusable
Graham v. Connor - ANS -Case that wrote out the amount of force an officer could use
Tennessee v. Garner (1985) - ANS -Use of deadly force to prevent escape of a fleeing suspect
if it is belived that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the
officer or others.
Elkins v. U.S. 1960 - ANS -a US Supreme Court decision that held the "silver platter doctrine",
which allowed federal prosecutors to use evidence illegally gathered by state police, to be a
violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Mapp v. Ohio - ANS -Exclusionary rule applies to all states. 4th amendment protection.
Miranda v. Arizona - ANS -Supreme Court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their
right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning
by police.
Municipal court of record - ANS -Must have population of at least 65,000
May provide jury trials
May fine up to $12000
