100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

RELG 2650 MIDTERM QUESTIONS WITH 100% CORRECT ANSWERS

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
21
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
20-01-2025
Written in
2024/2025

RELG 2650 MIDTERM QUESTIONS WITH 100% CORRECT ANSWERS

Institution
RELG 2650
Course
RELG 2650










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
RELG 2650
Course
RELG 2650

Document information

Uploaded on
January 20, 2025
Number of pages
21
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Content preview

should enact public policy based on good of society rather than individual rights


Give this one a try later!


communitarian




1) care is best exemplified by caring interactions between intimates
2) care is situated within relationships

,3) care appeals to emotion
4) care ethics is not a principle-based account
5) for care ethics, the right action is only clear in the context of focused attention to
the immediate situation
6) ethic of care assumes relationship-centered social nature of being and
corresponding self-understanding


Give this one a try later!


6 themes of ethics of care




to warrant another's confidence in one's character and conduct (virtue ethics)


Give this one a try later!


trustworthiness




-sensitive attention to the best interest of others; balancing conflicts of wants and
best interests that requires sympathetic dialogue
--preserving the confidence/dignity of the person by working out the problem
together
sympathetic understanding-ability to emphasize with the people in the situation


(one of the four processes of care ethics)


Give this one a try later!


Maternalism (sympathetic understanding)

, Norms about right and wrong human conduct so widely shared that they form a
stable (if incomplete) social agreement


Give this one a try later!


common morality




- use of case-comparison and analogy to reach moral conclusions


Give this one a try later!


casuistry/ethical pragmatism




- creation + redemption


Give this one a try later!


Theological basis for dignity of human person




B and C try to determine how do bioethicists in a pluralist society (framework for
America) on how to work through conflicts based on our differences
-the deeper disagreements that their framework cannot help. It can only handle so
much. Where you can't appeal to the process of weighing and balancing
-more community culture versus the individual (individual is more moral dilemma)


Give this one a try later!

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
TestITandFixIT Johns Hopkins University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
39
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
4737
Last sold
2 days ago

3.5

8 reviews

5
3
4
2
3
1
2
0
1
2

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions