Test bank for employment law for business 10th edition dawn bennett alexander

TEST BANK FOR
N N




Employment Law for Business, 10th Edition, Dawn Bennett-
N N N N N N N




AlexanderChapter 1-16 Answers are at the End of Each Chapter
N N N N N N N N N N




Chapter 01:
N




Student name:
N N




TRUE/FALSEN-NWriteN'T'NifNtheNstatementNisNtrueNandN'F'NifNtheNstatementNisNfalse.
1) AgencyNlaw,NbasedNonNtheNtraditionalNlawNcalledNmasterNandNservant,NgovernsNemployme
ntNrelationships.
⊚ true
⊚ false



2) InNanNemployment-
agencyNrelationship,NifNanNagentNactsNbeyondNhisNorNherNauthority,NtheNprincipalNmayNbeNliableNf
orNanyNresultingNlossNtoNaNthirdNparty.
⊚ true
⊚ false



3) MyraNprovidesNaccountingNservicesNasNanNindependentNcontractorNforNGreatNNorthern.N
BecauseNofNthisNrelationship,NGreatNNorthernNisNresponsibleNforNwithholdingNandNpayingNMyra
'sNemploymentNtaxes,NincludingNfederalNunemploymentNcompensationN(FUTA),NSocialNSecurit
yN(FICA)NandNFICANexciseNtax.
⊚ true
⊚ false



4) EmployersNareNnotNliableNforNmostNtortsNcommittedNbyNanNindependentNcontractorNwith
inNtheNscopeNofNtheNworkingNrelationship.
⊚ true
⊚ false



5) ThereNisNaNsingleNcommonlyNacceptedNdefinitionNofN"employee"NusedNbyNcourts,Nemployer
s,NandNtheNgovernment.

, ⊚ true
⊚ false



6) FreshNIdeasNemploysNpart-
timeNworkersNthroughNaNstaffingNfirm.NAfterNtheNstaffingNfirmNsentNoverNaNpart-
timeNofficeNassistant,NFreshNIdeasNaskedNtheNfirmNtoNreplaceNherNwithNsomeoneNfromNaNdifferen
tNrace.NTheNreplacedNofficeNassistantNcannotNproceedNwithNaNdiscriminationNclaimNunderNTitleN
VIINofNtheNCivilNRightsNActNsinceNsheN(theNpart-
timeNofficeNassistant)NwasNneverNanNemployeeNofNFreshNIdeas.
⊚ true
⊚ false



MULTIPLENCHOICEN-
NChooseNtheNoneNalternativeNthatNbestNcompletes NtheNstatementNorN answersNtheNquestion.
7) IfNanNemployeeNhasNaNcarNaccidentNwhileNdrivingNaNcompanyNcarNfromNoneNcompanyNoffi
ceNtoNanother,NtheNemployerNmayNbeNliableNtoNtheNownerNofNtheNotherNvehicleNunderNwhichNlegalN
theory?

A) VicariousNliability
B) JointNliability
C) StrictNliability
D) Negligence



8) WhichNfederalNlawNprotectsNemployeesNfromNunfairNlaborNpracticesNofNemployers?

A) OccupationalNSafetyNandNHealthNAct
B) NationalNLaborNRelationsNAct
C) FairNLaborNStandardsNAct
D) LaborNManagementNRelationsNAct



9) ANwillfulNmisclassificationNofNworkersNbyNanNemployerNmayNresultNinNharshNsanction
s,NincludingNimprisonmentNandNaNfineNofNupNtoN$10,000,NunderNwhichNfederalNlaw?

, A) FederalNUnemploymentNCompensationNActN(FUTA)
B) FairNLaborNStandardsNActN(FLSA)
C) NationalNLaborNRelationsNActN(NLRA)
D) FederalNInsuranceNContributionsNActN(FICA)



10) WhichNofNtheNfollowingNisNcurrentlyNconsideredNtoNbeNtheNleadingNtestNtoNdetermi
neNemployeeNstatus?

A) Common-lawNagencyNtest
B) IRSN20-factorNanalysis
C) EconomicsNrealitiesNtest
D) DegreeNofNcontrolNtest



11) HowNmanyNemployeesNmustNanNentityNhaveNunderNTheNCivilNRightsNActNofN1866NtoNquali
fyNasNanNemployerNunderNtheNAct?

A) 15Nemployees
B) 20Nemployees
C) 50Nemployees
D) NoNminimumNrequirement



12) TheNRehabilitationNActNofN1973NappliesNtoNgovernmentNcontractorsNthatNmaintainNcontrac
tsNwithNtheNfederalNgovernmentNinNexcessNofNhowNmuchNannually?

A)N $1,000
B)N $5,000
C)N $10,000
D)N NoNminimumNdollarNamount

, 13) CMS,NInc.NsolicitedNbidsNfromNvariousNcontractorsNtoNdevelopNandNmaintainNtheNgroundsN
ofNitsNnewNofficeNcomplex.NRoberta,NtheNheadNofNfacilitiesNmanagementNatNCMS,NtoldNherNsecretar
y,NLeAnne,NthatNsheNwillNnotNacceptNanyNbidsNfromNaNRussianNcontractor.NSheNthenNrejectedNaNbid
NmadeNbyNaNRussianNcontractorNwithoutNanyNlegitimateNreason.NIfNtheNRussianNcontractorNbringsN


aNlawsuitNagainstNCMSNforNdiscrimination,NwhatNisNtheNlikelyNresult?

A) Roberta'sNrefusalNtoNhireNRussianNcontractorsNwillNbeNfoundNtoNbeNaNviolationNofNt
heNSocialNSecurityNAct.
B) Roberta'sNrefusalNtoNhireNRussianNcontractorsNwillNbeNfoundNtoNbeNaNviolationNofNt
heNConsumerNProtectionNAct.
C) Roberta'sNrefusalNtoNhireNRussianNcontractorsNwillNnotNbeNconsideredNanNoffenseNbeca
useNemployersNinNtheNUnitedNStatesNareNfreeNtoNdiscriminateNagainstNemployeesNbasedNonNtheirNra
ceNorNnationalNorigin.
D) Roberta'sNrefusalNtoNhireNRussianNcontractorsNwillNnotNbeNconsideredNaNviolationN
ofNTitleNVIINofNtheNCivilNRightsNActNbecauseNthatNlawNdoesNnotNcoverNdiscriminationNagainstNi
ndependentNcontractors.



14) RileyNisNaNfreelanceNhandymanNhiredNbyNBob’sNBurgersNwheneverNsmallNrepairsNareNneed
edNinNtheNstore.NRileyNisNpaidNperNprojectNandNusuallyNworksNatNBob’sNBurgersNoneNdayNaNmonth.N
WhichNofNtheNfollowingNisNlikelyNtrueNofNthisNscenario?

A) Bob’sNburgersNwillNneedNtoNwithholdNaNcertainNpercentageNofNRiley'sNwagesNforNfeder
alNincomeNtaxNpurposes.
B) RileyNcannotNbeNheldNliableNforNanyNtortsNcommittedNbyNhimNwithinNtheNscopeNofNt
heNworkingNrelationship.
C) RileyNcanNmakeNaNclaimNforNmedicalNorNretirementNbenefitsNfromNBob’sNBurgersNasN
heNisNanNemployee.
D) RileyNcannotNmakeNaNclaimNforNmedicalNorNretirementNbenefitsNfromNBob’sNBurgersN
asNheNisNanNindependentNcontractor.



15) EmploymentNlawNbasedNonNagencyNprinciplesNimposesNaNdutyNonNanNemployeeNtoNactN
asNauthorized.NIfNtheNemployeeNexceedsNhisNorNherNauthority,NtheNemployerNis: