AR of murder - ANS-Unlawfully cause loss of life of a human being
Under Queen's Peace r v clegg
Not a fetus R V Copeland
Causes loss of life r v malcherek
Act or omission r v gibbons and proctor
Automatism defence - ANS-act completed without manage of thoughts
incapacity to control actions bratty
ar= involuntary hill v baxter
d ought to display:
a hundred% lack of voluntary manage a-g refrence 2
caused by outside issue quick
self precipitated automatism:
fail if prompted by means of reckless intoxication
faded duty - ANS-S2 Homicide Act 1957
d has abnormality of functioning bobbing up from a recognized scientific circumstance:
despair r v martin
battered girl syndrome aluwalia
pre menstrual syndrome English
impossible to resist impulses r v byrne
which substantially impairs ds capacity to:
form a rational judgement martin
apprehend nature in their conduct English
workout self manage bryne no longer general- Lloyd
the abnormality explains ds component inside the killing:
now not intoxication r v dietchsman
duress defence - ANS-forced to dedicate criminal act with the aid of a person else
duress via risk:
ds will overbourne with the aid of threats Graham
subjective- did it because of worry of injure valderema vega
goal- reasonable guy might do the equal bowen
duress through occasions:
pressured to act in surrounding circumstances those with d could in any other case suffer
subjective _ goal
keep in mind:
risk related to crime cole
immediate hazard Hudson and taylor
Gross negligence manslaughter - ANS-victim died as a result of ds negligence
duty of care:
take affordable care of neighbour adomako donaughue and Stevenson