Continuity and Connectedness
Recall that:
Def. Two subsets 𝐴, 𝐵 of a metric space 𝑋, 𝑑 are said to be separated if 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵̅=∅
and 𝐴̅ ∩ 𝐵 = ∅ (i.e., no point of 𝐴 lies in the closure of 𝐵 and no point of 𝐵 lies in
the closure of 𝐴).
Def. A set 𝐸 ⊆ 𝑋, 𝑑 a metric space is said to be connected if 𝐸 is not the union of
two nonempty separated sets.
Ex. if 𝐴 = (0,1) and 𝐵 = (1,2) , then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are separated sets since
𝐴̅ = [0,1], 𝐵̅ = [1,2]
thus: 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵̅ = (0,1) ∩ [1,2] = ∅ and
𝐴̅ ∩ 𝐵 = [0,1] ∩ (1,2) = ∅.
Thus the set 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 = (0,1) ∪ (1,2) is not a connected set.
Ex. If 𝐴 = (0,1] and 𝐵 = (1,2), then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are not separated since
𝐵̅ = [1,2] and thus
𝐴 ∩ 𝐵̅ = (0,1]∩ [1,2] = {1} ≠ ∅
(notice that 𝐴̅ ∩ 𝐵 = [0,1] ∩ (1,2) = ∅).
Theorem: A subset 𝐸 ⊆ ℝ is connected if and only if , if 𝑥𝜖𝐸, 𝑦𝜖𝐸 and
𝑥 < 𝑧 < 𝑦 then 𝑧𝜖𝐸 .
, 2
Theorem: If 𝑓 is a continuous mapping of a metric space 𝑋 into a metric space 𝑌,
and if 𝐸 is a connected subset of 𝑋 then 𝑓(𝐸 ) is connected.
Proof: (This will be a proof by contradiction) Assume the contrary, i.e. that 𝑓 is a
continuous mapping and 𝑓(𝐸 ) is not connected.
Thus 𝑓(𝐸 ) = 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵, where 𝐴 and 𝐵 are non-empty separated sets.
𝑋 𝑌
𝐸
𝐻 𝐵
𝑓 𝐴
𝐺
Let 𝐺 = 𝐸 ∩ 𝑓 −1 (𝐴), 𝐻 = 𝐸 ∩ 𝑓 −1 (𝐵).
Then 𝐸 = 𝐺 ∪ 𝐻 and neither 𝐺 nor 𝐻 is empty.
Since 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴̅, we have 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑓 −1 (𝐴̅) and 𝑓 −1 (𝐴̅) is closed because 𝑓 is
continuous and 𝐴̅ is closed (inverse image of a closed set is closed when 𝑓 is
continuous).
Since 𝑓 −1 (𝐴̅) is closed, 𝐺̅ ⊆ 𝑓 −1 (𝐴̅).
This means that 𝑓(𝐺̅ ) ⊆ 𝐴̅.
Since 𝑓 (𝐻 ) = 𝐵 and 𝐴̅ ∩ 𝐵 = ∅ (𝐴 and 𝐵 are separated sets), 𝐺̅ ∩ 𝐻 = ∅.
(If 𝑦𝜖𝐺̅ ∩ 𝐻, then 𝑓(𝑦)𝜖𝐴̅ since 𝑦𝜖𝐺̅ , and 𝑓(𝑦)𝜖𝐵 since 𝑦𝜖𝐻, but 𝐴̅ ∩ 𝐵 = ∅ ).
̅ = ∅.
A similar argument shows 𝐺 ∩ 𝐻
But that would mean that 𝐺, 𝐻 are separated sets with 𝐸 = 𝐺 ∪ 𝐻 and thus 𝐸 is
not connected, a contradiction.
Thus 𝑓(𝐸) is connected.