THE STRUCTURE OF CONTRACT LAW/ PGDL/ LATEST
UPDATE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS.
QUESTION: What are the main invitation to treat situations? - ANSWER-- Advertisement
- Self-service and shop windows
- Auctions (with reserve)
- Invitations to tender
- Mere statements of price
QUESTION: What is the postal rule? - ANSWER-- Acceptance occurs when the letter is posted not when
it is received
- Also applies if the letter is never received (proof of postage)
- Postal rule can be ousted in the offer
- Only applies to acceptance not revocation
QUESTION: Can the offeror stipulate the method of acceptance? - ANSWER-- Yes, but they must CLEARLY
STATE that only the stipulated method will be accepted.
- Remember an equally expeditious method to that stipulated should be sufficient (Timm v Hoffman)
,QUESTION: The general rule is that acceptance has no effect until communicated. However, what are
the other considerations? - ANSWER-- Silence cannot amount to acceptance
- Acceptance in unilateral contracts (no need to communicate. Performance)
- Acceptance by conduct (may be inferred by conduct without being expressly communicated)
QUESTION: Counter offer v Request for information - ANSWER-Counter offer (Hyde v Wrench)
- Destroys previous offer, rendering it incapable of acceptance
- role of offeror and offeree swaps
Request for information (Stevenson, Jacques and Co v McLean)
- Does not attempt to vary the terms of offer
- The previous offer remains open for acceptance
QUESTION: Types of Termination - ANSWER-- Rejection
- Revocation (think about communication in bilateral and unilateral)
- Lapse in time
- Failure to comply with condition
- Death of one of the parties (think about offeror v offeree)
QUESTION: Acceptance must be... - ANSWER-- In response to the offer
- Unqualified
,- Communicated (think about third party communication)
QUESTION: When is intention to create legal relations presumed? - ANSWER-- In commercial agreement
it is presumed that there is an intention
- In a social/domestic agreement it is not presumed that there is an intention
QUESTION: How can the presumption that the parties have an ICLR be rebutted? - ANSWER-Wording
that the parties do not intend to create legal relations that is clear and unambiguous
QUESTION: What is consideration? - ANSWER-The value given in return for a promise. Look out for the
exchange.
QUESTION: Issues with consideration when varying existing contract - ANSWER-- Variation to pay more
for an obligation in an existing contract between the parties (Promise to pay more). Standard rule is no
consideration.
- Variation to accept part payment of a debt under an existing contract (Promise to accept less).
Standard rule is no consideration.
QUESTION: Exceptions to the rule (promise to pay more) - ANSWER-Hartley v Ponsonby
- Is there extra? Is there something of value to enforce the extra payment?
Then...
, Williams v Roffey
- Must first identify no fresh consideration.
- Is there a practical benefit?
QUESTION: Exceptions to the rule (promise to accept less) - ANSWER-Promissory estoppel
- Equitable remedy (discretionary)
- Can make a promise binding even without consideration
QUESTION: Rules governing consideration - ANSWER-- Must not be past
- Must move from the promisee
- Need not be adequate
- Must be sufficient (real, tangible, valuable)
QUESTION: Types of Consideration - ANSWER-- Executed (promise to perform act in future)
- Executory (usually a reward - performs an act to fulfil a promise)
- Past (not enforceable Y)
QUESTION: Those who do not have capacity to enter a contract? - ANSWER-- Minors (remember there
are 2 exceptions)
- Due to lack of mental capacity
- Due to intoxication
UPDATE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS.
QUESTION: What are the main invitation to treat situations? - ANSWER-- Advertisement
- Self-service and shop windows
- Auctions (with reserve)
- Invitations to tender
- Mere statements of price
QUESTION: What is the postal rule? - ANSWER-- Acceptance occurs when the letter is posted not when
it is received
- Also applies if the letter is never received (proof of postage)
- Postal rule can be ousted in the offer
- Only applies to acceptance not revocation
QUESTION: Can the offeror stipulate the method of acceptance? - ANSWER-- Yes, but they must CLEARLY
STATE that only the stipulated method will be accepted.
- Remember an equally expeditious method to that stipulated should be sufficient (Timm v Hoffman)
,QUESTION: The general rule is that acceptance has no effect until communicated. However, what are
the other considerations? - ANSWER-- Silence cannot amount to acceptance
- Acceptance in unilateral contracts (no need to communicate. Performance)
- Acceptance by conduct (may be inferred by conduct without being expressly communicated)
QUESTION: Counter offer v Request for information - ANSWER-Counter offer (Hyde v Wrench)
- Destroys previous offer, rendering it incapable of acceptance
- role of offeror and offeree swaps
Request for information (Stevenson, Jacques and Co v McLean)
- Does not attempt to vary the terms of offer
- The previous offer remains open for acceptance
QUESTION: Types of Termination - ANSWER-- Rejection
- Revocation (think about communication in bilateral and unilateral)
- Lapse in time
- Failure to comply with condition
- Death of one of the parties (think about offeror v offeree)
QUESTION: Acceptance must be... - ANSWER-- In response to the offer
- Unqualified
,- Communicated (think about third party communication)
QUESTION: When is intention to create legal relations presumed? - ANSWER-- In commercial agreement
it is presumed that there is an intention
- In a social/domestic agreement it is not presumed that there is an intention
QUESTION: How can the presumption that the parties have an ICLR be rebutted? - ANSWER-Wording
that the parties do not intend to create legal relations that is clear and unambiguous
QUESTION: What is consideration? - ANSWER-The value given in return for a promise. Look out for the
exchange.
QUESTION: Issues with consideration when varying existing contract - ANSWER-- Variation to pay more
for an obligation in an existing contract between the parties (Promise to pay more). Standard rule is no
consideration.
- Variation to accept part payment of a debt under an existing contract (Promise to accept less).
Standard rule is no consideration.
QUESTION: Exceptions to the rule (promise to pay more) - ANSWER-Hartley v Ponsonby
- Is there extra? Is there something of value to enforce the extra payment?
Then...
, Williams v Roffey
- Must first identify no fresh consideration.
- Is there a practical benefit?
QUESTION: Exceptions to the rule (promise to accept less) - ANSWER-Promissory estoppel
- Equitable remedy (discretionary)
- Can make a promise binding even without consideration
QUESTION: Rules governing consideration - ANSWER-- Must not be past
- Must move from the promisee
- Need not be adequate
- Must be sufficient (real, tangible, valuable)
QUESTION: Types of Consideration - ANSWER-- Executed (promise to perform act in future)
- Executory (usually a reward - performs an act to fulfil a promise)
- Past (not enforceable Y)
QUESTION: Those who do not have capacity to enter a contract? - ANSWER-- Minors (remember there
are 2 exceptions)
- Due to lack of mental capacity
- Due to intoxication