Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

JRN 430 final exam review answers

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
7
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
17-10-2024
Written in
2024/2025

JRN 430 final exam review answers Unsigned opinion of a court is calledper curiam opinion Courts of appealEstablish precedent Laws are well-tailored when theyAre not vague or overboard Statutes may be enacted by legislaturesAt the state, the federal or local level Among the three branches of government, the executive isCo-equal Of the amendments proposed to the U.S. ConstitutionA few of them have been approved or ratified Stare decisis meansLet the decision stand An action taken by the government to prohibit publication of a specific document or text is distributed to the public; a policy that requires government approval before publicationPrior restraint In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court ruled thatPrior restraints pose a serious threat of censorship, laws that punish past actions by banning future publications are a form of prior restraint, prior restraints may be legal when necessary to serve an extremely important government interest (A, B and D)

Show more Read less
Institution
JRN 430
Course
JRN 430

Content preview

JRN 430 Mid-Term answers
5 Elements to prove libel✔✔1. Defamation 2. Falsity 3. Identification 4. Harm 5.
Publication

Actual Malice✔✔knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth

Libel Defenses✔✔- Truth
- Wire Service
- Statute of Limitations
- Neutral Reportage
- Opinion
- Consent
- Fair Comment & Criticism
- Summary Judgement

SLAPP lawsuits✔✔Lawsuits whose purpose is to harass critics into silence, often to
suppress those critics' First Amendment rights.

Libel per se✔✔Libel on its face; obvious

Libel per quod✔✔Not obvious; assemble pieces

Types of Damages in Libel Suits✔✔Actual damages (compensation)
Assumed damages (court assumes reputation was ruined but plaintiff can't prove
actual damage)
Punitive damages (punish defense)

Burden of Proof for public person✔✔actual malice

burden of proof for private person✔✔negligence

O'Brien Test✔✔A 4-part test used to determine whether govt. regulation on symbolic
speech is constitutional. 1. Is regulation within constitutional power of govt.? 2. Does
regulation further substantial govt. interest? 3. Is govt. interest unrelated to
suppression of free expression? 4. Is incidental restriction of expression no greater
than needed?....if all YES, regulation IS constitutional. So, O'Brien did not have right
to burn draft card.

John Peter Zenger✔✔New York publisher who was taken to court for criticizing the
governor of New York. Defended it by saying what he published was TRUE via
Andrew Hamilton.

libel tourism✔✔the act of suing a writer for alleged defamation in a foreign
jurisdiction where there are weaker libel laws

Times when Prior Restraint is justified✔✔1. Movement of Troop Ships (National
Security)

, 2. Clear and Present Danger
3. Obscenity

Tort✔✔Case of civil action (Ex: libel)

Lowest Court✔✔District

Middle Court✔✔Court of Appeals

Highest Court✔✔Supreme Court

Lowest court(s) in Michigan✔✔Circuit and District

Legislative Branch✔✔Senate (100 members) and House of Representatives (435
members)

Judicial Branch✔✔Supreme Court

Executive Branch✔✔President, Vice President, Cabinet

What branch can be F.O.I.A'd?✔✔Executive Branch ONLY

1st Amendment Rights✔✔Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and
Petition

Criminal Speech✔✔Child Pornography

Aeropagitica (1644)✔✔John Milton. Est. Open Marketplace of Ideas (term actually
coined by Justice Holmes)

Abrams v. US✔✔Defendant's criticism of US involvement with WWI not protected by
first amendment, bc it advocated a strike and violent overthrow of government.
(These r the WW1 protests that started presenting issues with 1st
Amendment/freedom of expression)

commercial speech✔✔Advertisements and commercials for products and services;
they receive less First Amendment protection, primarily to discourage false and
misleading ads.

Levels of Scrutiny✔✔rational basis, intermediate scrutiny, strict scrutiny

Balancing Test✔✔The view of the majority of the Supreme Court that First
Amendment rights must be weighed against the competing needs of the community
to preserve order.

Nulla poena sine lege✔✔No punishment without law

Written for

Institution
JRN 430
Course
JRN 430

Document information

Uploaded on
October 17, 2024
Number of pages
7
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$8.49
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
ExamZen

Also available in package deal

Thumbnail
Package deal
JRN 430 Quiz 2 and answers PACKAGE
-
9 2024
$ 30.95 More info

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
ExamZen Liberty University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
16
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
3
Documents
539
Last sold
1 month ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions