LLW2601 Assignment 2
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 - DUE 13
September 2024
CONTACT:
, LLW2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 - DUE 13 September 2024
QUESTION 1 THE ANSWER FOR QUESTION 1 MUST NOT
EXCEED 2 (TWO) PAGES. YOU MUST CAREFULLY READ
THE SCENARIO BEFORE YOU TRY TO ANSWER IT. Vatiswa
works for Tseba Taba Tsago Professionals (TTP). TTP
employs people whose services it avails to its own clients
in exchange for an agreed fixed amount. Vatiswa receives
her salary payments from TTP and TTP is responsible for
paying her UIF contributions and deducting her employee
taxes. For the last six months, Vatiswa has worked as a
filing clerk on behalf of her TTP’s client, McDonald-
Kentucky Corporation (MKC), in Mthatha. Recently,
Vatiswa discovered that she earns less money than other
filing clerks directly employed by MKC and did not receive
an annual bonus which the MKC employees were entitled
to despite doing the same work as them. Vatiswa decides
to use an Large language model (so-called “Al” model) in
order to obtain legal advice for her legal predicament.
(GO TO NEXT PAGE) Page 4 of 6 LLW2601 ASSESSMENT 2
Below is the answer provided by the ChatGPT AI:
AlLANSWER Vatiswa's situation raises several important
legal considerations under South African labor law,
particularly concerning the principle of equal pay for
equal work and the nature of her employment through
Tseba Taba Tsago Professionals (TTP). 1. Equal Pay for
Equal Work: Vatiswa has discovered that she earns less
money than other filing clerks directly employed by
McDonald-Kentucky Corporation (MKC), despite
performing the same duties. This situation potentially
violates the principle of equal pay for equal work as
enshrined in South African labor laws, particularly in
terms of the Employment Equity Act, No. 55 of 1998. This
(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 - DUE 13
September 2024
CONTACT:
, LLW2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS)
Semester 2 2024 - DUE 13 September 2024
QUESTION 1 THE ANSWER FOR QUESTION 1 MUST NOT
EXCEED 2 (TWO) PAGES. YOU MUST CAREFULLY READ
THE SCENARIO BEFORE YOU TRY TO ANSWER IT. Vatiswa
works for Tseba Taba Tsago Professionals (TTP). TTP
employs people whose services it avails to its own clients
in exchange for an agreed fixed amount. Vatiswa receives
her salary payments from TTP and TTP is responsible for
paying her UIF contributions and deducting her employee
taxes. For the last six months, Vatiswa has worked as a
filing clerk on behalf of her TTP’s client, McDonald-
Kentucky Corporation (MKC), in Mthatha. Recently,
Vatiswa discovered that she earns less money than other
filing clerks directly employed by MKC and did not receive
an annual bonus which the MKC employees were entitled
to despite doing the same work as them. Vatiswa decides
to use an Large language model (so-called “Al” model) in
order to obtain legal advice for her legal predicament.
(GO TO NEXT PAGE) Page 4 of 6 LLW2601 ASSESSMENT 2
Below is the answer provided by the ChatGPT AI:
AlLANSWER Vatiswa's situation raises several important
legal considerations under South African labor law,
particularly concerning the principle of equal pay for
equal work and the nature of her employment through
Tseba Taba Tsago Professionals (TTP). 1. Equal Pay for
Equal Work: Vatiswa has discovered that she earns less
money than other filing clerks directly employed by
McDonald-Kentucky Corporation (MKC), despite
performing the same duties. This situation potentially
violates the principle of equal pay for equal work as
enshrined in South African labor laws, particularly in
terms of the Employment Equity Act, No. 55 of 1998. This
