Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Central Nervous System Vasculitis: Still More Questions than Answers

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
12
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
10-08-2024
Written in
2024/2025

2.5.2.1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) MRI is sensitive but not specific in revealing changes associated with PACNS [30]. Lesions are frequently multiple and bilateral and include parenchymal or meningeal enhancing areas, ischemic areas or infarcts in the cortex, deep white matter, or periventricular white matter (Fig. 1A). It may also disclose hemorrhagic lesions [31, 32]. The sensitivity of MRI in biopsy-proven PACNS is very high, disclosing abnormalities in 97% of cases [22, 32-34] but abnormal findings are non specific. Diffusion weighted imaging is highly sensitive in detecting diffusion abnormalities and may be useful in patients with normal MRI [35]. MRA has limited sensitivity and is only able to disclose abnormalities in the largest intracranial vessels. The same limitations apply to CT-angiography [33, 34]. 2.5.2.2. Conventional Angiography Conventional angiography is the most specific imaging technique for the diagnosis of PACNS and, compared to MRA is able to detect abnormalities in smaller vessels. Typical angiographic features of PACNS include multiple “beading” or segmental narrowing in large, intermediate, or small arteries with interposed regions of ectasia or normal luminal architecture [31-33] (Fig. 1D). Beading may be smooth or irregular and typically occurs bilaterally. Additional changes include aneurysms, collateral flow, isolated areas of vessel narrowing in multiple branches, circumferential or eccentric vessel irregularities, multiple occlusions with sharp cutoffs, and apparently avascular mass lesions [31-33]. Although findings from CNS conventional angiograms may support the diagnosis of PACNS and can be used to direct the site of biopsy, none of these findings alone is diagnostic because similar images can be present in other diseases (Tables 1 and 2) [2, 5, 22, 28, 36-38]. Although essential for diagnosis, angiography has limited sensitivity and specificity. Patients with biopsy-proven PACNS may have normal appearing angiograms and, conversely, biopsies of angiographically abnormal vessels have been reported as normal [2, 5, 28]. The sensitivity of angiography in detecting PACNS ranges from 20% to 90% [1, 9, 31, 35, 37, 38] and specificity from 20 to 60% [1, 9, 31, 34]. The sensitivity of cerebral angiography decreases along with the caliber of the involved vessels, being most sensitive for involvement of large-medium sized vessels. Angiography is not exempt of side effects. About 0.8% of patients subjected to angiography experience additional neurologic deficits as an adverse event related to the procedure [32]. However, given the severity of PACNS and the difficulties in achieving an accurate diagnosis, the risk/ benefit is acceptable and conventional angiography is recommended as a key diagnostic procedure. 2.5.2.3. Histopathologic Examination Brain biopsy is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of PACNS but reveals diagnostic histopathologic abnormalities in only 50% to 75% of cases [1] (Fig. 1B and C). The role of brain biopsy in PACNS is not limited to proving inflammation of blood vessels: it is also important to excluding other conditions such as infection, malignancy, or degenerative diseases for which completely different treatment approaches are required (Table 1) [5, 27]. In the largest series of PACNS patients undergoing surgical biopsy, including 43 patients, diagnostic sensitivity of brain biopsy was 63% [20]. In this series, the distribution of the various morphologic patterns was as follows: acute necrotizing (14%), purely lymphocytic (28%) and granulomatous (58%), with no statistically significant differences in disease aggressiveness or response to treatment among them. Interestingly, 78% of the biopsies directed to an imaging abnormality were diagnostic, whereas none of the blind biopsies demonstrated vasculitis. Biopsies including leptomeninges were slightly more sensitive in detecting vasculitis than those not including it (58% vs. 40%). In accordance with these results other authors have reported a sensitivity of brain biopsy around 50% [2, 16]. The high proportion of negative biopsies in patients with clinical and radiographic features Fig. (1A). Multiple, non-specific, T2 hyperintense lesions in a 63- year old patient with suspected primary angiitis of the CNS who presented with headache and cognitive impairment. B) Granulomatous pattern of primary angiitis of the central nervous system. Transmural inflammation involves a muscular artery of the leptomeninges with prominent mononuclear (upper) and granulomatous (lower) adventitial inflammation as well as intimal injury with focal fibrin thrombus formation (hematoxylin and eosin 20). Courtesy of Dr Carlo Salvarani. C) Inflammatory involvement of a small vessel. Courtesy of Dr Leonard H Calabrese. D) Multiple areas of irregular stenosis and ectasia in a 44year-old patient with biopsyproven PACNS. Courtesy of Dr Leonard H Calabrese. 440 Current Neuropharmacology, 2011, Vol. 9, No. 3 Alba et al. highly suggestive of PACNS may be explained by the segmental nature of lesions. Moreover biopsies are usually taken from the superficial parenchyma and leptomeninges and, in some instances, involved vessels are of greater size and are located deeper from these areas [20]. To maximize the diagnostic sensitivity of the procedure it is recommended that biopsies are performed in abnormal areas detected by previous imaging and include leptomeninges. Stereotactic biopsy is recommended for mass lesions only [20, 25]. Occasionally, amyloid deposits can be observed [20, 25]. These are more frequently found in samples with a granulomatous pattern and those presenting as mass lesions [20, 25]. Clinically, patients with amyloid deposits are older and more frequently presenting with acute onset and cognitive impairment [39]. Clinical outcome and response to treatment seems to be similar to that of patients with no amyloid deposits [39]. 2.5.2.4. Diagnostic Criteria Since histopathologic confirmation of PACNS is not always feasible, Calabrese and Mallek proposed a series of diagnostic criteria combining, clinical, imaging and histopathologic findings [1]. These include: 1) neurologic deficit that remains unexplained after a vigorous diagnostic workup, including lumbar puncture and neuroimaging studies, 2) angiographic abnormalities highly suggestive of vasculitis or histopathologic evidence of vasculitis within the CNS and 3) no evidence of systemic vasculitis or any other condition to which the angiographic or pathologic findings can be attributed. These conditions are listed in Table 1 (Fig. 2). 2.5.2.5. Treatment No randomized controlled trials or prospective studies have been performed with patients with PACNS. Therefore, therapeutic recommendations are based on extrapolation of data obtained from trials performed in other severe systemic vasculitides, retrospective studies, small case series and expert opinion [2, 5, 40]. In a retrospective review of treatments received by 101 patients diagnosed with PACNS (70 by angiography, 31 by biopsy) Salvarani et al. found that 97 patients were treated with glucocorticosteroids, 25 of them with 1gr intravenous methyl-prednisolone pulses and the remaining with oral prednisone at a median dose of 60 mg/day [9]. Forty-nine patients received an immunosuppressive agent: 46 cyclophosphamide (oral at 150 mg/day or intravenous at around 1 gr/month) and 3 azathioprine. A favorable response was observed in 81% of the patients treated with glucocorticoids alone and in 81% of those receiving both prednisone and cyclophosphamide. Given the retrospective nature of the survey it is not possible to conclude that immunosuppressive agents are not necessary since the group receiving cyclophosphamide may have been considered more severe by treating physicians. Treatment with glucocorticoids (oral prednisone or equivalent at 60 mg/day preceded by three 1 gr intravenous pulses in severe cases) should, then, be started as soon as CNS vasculitis (primary or secondary) is clinically suspected and infectious diseases reasonably excluded. Prednisone can be quickly tapered if the diagnosis is eventually ruled out. When the diagnosis of CNS vasculitis is also supported by angiography or biopsy and mimics are convincingly excluded, cyclophosphamide (oral at 150 mg/day or 1gr monthly pulse) is recommended. Pulse intravenous cycloTable 1. Mimics of Primary Angiitis of the

Show more Read less
Institution
Central Nervous System Vasculitis
Course
Central Nervous System Vasculitis

Content preview

Current Neuropharmacology, 2011, 9, 437-448 437


Central Nervous System Vasculitis: Still More Questions than Answers

Marco A. Alba, Georgina Espígol-Frigolé, Sergio Prieto-González, Itziar Tavera-Bahillo,
Ana García-Martínez, Montserrat Butjosa, José Hernández-Rodríguez and Maria C. Cid*

Vasculitis Research Unit, Department of Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona,
Institut d´Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain

Abstract: The central nervous system (CNS) may be involved by a variety of inflammatory diseases of blood vessels.
These include primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS), a rare disorder specifically targeting the CNS
vasculature, and the systemic vasculitides which may affect the CNS among other organs and systems. Both situations
are severe and convey a guarded prognosis. PACNS usually presents with headache and cognitive impairment. Focal
symptoms are infrequent at disease onset but are common in more advanced stages. The diagnosis of PACNS is difficult
because, although magnetic resonance imaging is almost invariably abnormal, findings are non specific. Angiography has
limited sensitivity and specificity. Brain and leptomeningeal biopsy may provide a definitive diagnosis when disclosing
blood vessel inflammation and are also useful to exclude other conditions presenting with similar findings. However,
since lesions are segmental, a normal biopsy does not completely exclude PACNS. Secondary CNS involvement by
systemic vasculitis occurs in less than one fifth of patients but may be devastating. A prompt recognition and aggressive
treatment is crucial to avoid permanent damage and dysfunction. Glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide are recom-
mended for patients with PACNS and for patients with secondary CNS involvement by small-medium-sized systemic
vasculitis. CNS involvement in large-vessel vasculitis is usually managed with high-dose glucocorticoids (giant-cell
arteritis) or glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents (Takayasu’s disease). However, in large vessel vasculitis,
where CNS symptoms are usually due to involvement of extracranial arteries (Takayasu’s disease) or proximal portions of
intracranial arteries (giant-cell arteritis), revascularization procedures may also have an important role.

Keywords: Vasculitis, Central nervous system.

1. INTRODUCTION it appears to be more frequent in males in their fourth and
fifth decades of life [2, 9]. PACNS may represent 1.2% of
The central nervous system (CNS) vasculature may be
vasculitis involving the CNS [3].
targeted by an heterogeneous group of inflammatory dis-
eases. In its isolated, primary form, angiitis of the CNS 2.2. Pathogenesis
(PACNS) is a rare form of vasculitis of unknown etiology
The pathogenesis of PACNS is unknown. Similar to
primarily affecting small and medium sized vessels supply-
other chronic inflammatory or autoimmune diseases, PACNS
ing the brain parenchyma, spinal cord and leptomeninges [1-
3]. PACNS results in signs and symptoms of CNS dysfunc- is thought to be triggered by infection. Cytomegalovirus,
Ebstein-Barr virus, varicella-zoster virus, human immuno-
tion with no clinically apparent participation of other organs.
deficiency virus, mycoplasma and chlamydia have been con-
The CNS may also be targeted, among other territories, by
sidered given the ability of these agents to produce vasculitic
systemic vasculitides [4, 5]. This review will focus on diag-
lesions [10-15]. However, in the majority of patients with
nostic and therapeutic aspects of PACNS and secondary
PACNS a potential relationship with these or other infectious
CNS involvement by systemic vasculitides in adulthood.
Primary and secondary CNS vasculitis in childhood have agents cannot be demonstrated.
been addressed in excellent recent reviews [6-8]. The granulomatous nature of the vascular inflammatory
lesions in most cases suggests a Th1-mediated response [3,
2. PRIMARY CNS VASCULITIS
16]. Th1-related cytokines may promote vascular inflamma-
2.1. Epidemiology tion in PACNS as suggested by several experimental models.
Intracerebral injections of interferon-gamma have been
Because of the rarity of PACNS and the absence of de-
shown to trigger inflammatory lesions and vasculitis in rats.
finitive diagnostic tests, epidemiologic studies are virtually [17]. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin-6 pro-
inexistent. An annual incidence of 2.4 per million people has
inflammatory functions may also contribute to vascular in-
been recently estimated in North America [9]. PACNS has
flammation in PACNS [18, 19]. TNF/TNF receptor p75
been reported in children [6-8] and in the elderly. However,
transgenic mice develop multifocal CNS ischemic injury
secondary to vasculitis [18]. Elevated CSF IL-6 has been
*Address correspondence to this author at the Systemic Autoimmune found in 3 patients with different types of vasculitis (polyar-
Diseases Department Hospital Clínic Villarroel 170 08036-Barcelona Spain; teritis nodosa, temporal arteritis and Behcet's disease) in-
Tel: +34 93 2275774; Fax: +34 93 2271707; E-mail: volving the CNS [19]. Current knowledge of the pathophysi-

1570-159X/11 $58.00+.00 ©2011 Bentham Science Publishers

, 438 Current Neuropharmacology, 2011, Vol. 9, No. 3 Alba et al.

ology of PACNS is very limited delaying progress in the major phenotypes: 1) Acute or more commonly subacute
diagnosis and management of affected patients. encephalopathy, presenting as a confusional syndrome with
progression to stupor and coma; 2) Disease presentation re-
2.3. Pathology
sembling atypical multiple sclerosis with a variety of focal
PACNS typically involves small-medium sized arteries symptoms such as optic neuropathy, brain stem episodes,
and veins, especially those located in leptomeninges and seizures, headaches, encephalopathic episodes or hemi-
subcortical areas. The characteristic histopathologic findings spheric stroke-like events and 3) Intracranial mass lesions,
consist of inflammatory infiltration of vessel walls by T with headache, drowsiness, focal signs and elevated intracra-
lymphocytes and activated macrophages which undergo nial pressure [24, 25].
granulomatous differentiation with giant-cell formation [3,
It has also been suggested that predominant involvement
16]. Inflammatory cells infiltrate the adventitia and subse-
of small versus medium-sized vessel may influence disease
quently progress through the artery wall causing fragmenta- presentation. Small-vessel PACNS manifests as a subacute
tion of the internal elastic lamina. Intimal proliferation and
or acute encephalopathy with persistent headaches, cognitive
fibrosis leading to vascular occlusion is frequently observed
impairment, confusion, and seizures. MRI usually discloses
[3, 16] (Fig. 1). This granulomatous pattern is the most
marked meningeal contrast enhancement whereas angiogra-
commonly seen and led to the previously used term granu-
phy may not reveal changes because the affected vessels are
lomatous angiitis of the CNS [3, 16, 20]. However, granulo-
small, beyond the detection threshold [26, 27]. This form of
matous features may not be always observed and some PACNS may respond to glucocorticoid monotherapy but
specimens disclose the so-called atypical CNS angiitis pat-
25% of patients relapse. In contrast, when medium-size ves-
terns consisting in predominantly lymphocytic infiltrates
sels are involved, in addition to headaches and general CNS
(lymphocytic pattern), necrotizing vasculitis with fibrinoid
dysfunction, focal neurologic deficits and stroke are more
necrosis (necrotizing pattern) or mixed patterns [20]. In some
common and angiography is more likely to reveal vascular
cases, B lymphocytes and plasma cells can also be observed
abnormalities [9, 26, 27]. Four clinical features are associ-
[21]. Vascular  amyloid deposits may be found in a subset ated with an increased mortality in patients with PACNS:
of patients [20].
focal neurological deficit, cognitive impairment, cerebral
Although most patients with PACNS present primarily infarction and involvement of larger vessels [9].
with CNS dysfunction, necropsy studies may disclose
General symptoms and findings suggesting some extent
clinically asymptomatic vasculitis in additional locations
of systemic involvement may occur. Fever, weight loss,
including lungs, kidneys and gastrointestinal tract [3, 5, 16].
livedo reticularis, rash, peripheral neuropathy, arthritis and
Distinction from systemic vasculitis with prominent CNS night sweats may be recorded in 20% of patients [2, 9].
involvement may be sometimes difficult to establish.
2. 5. Diagnosis
2.4. Clinical Manifestations
The diagnosis of PACNS is a challenge because of the
Depending on the areas of the brain involved, PACNS
lack of highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tests. Clini-
may convey a wide variety of clinical findings. Moreover,
cal, analytical, neuroimaging, and histopathologic data are
disease severity and rapidity of progression may be highly
important, both in supporting the diagnostic suspicion and in
variable among patients, increasing heterogeneity in clinical excluding other conditions which may present with similar
presentation.
features.
In the largest series reported including 101 patients [9],
2.5.1. Laboratory Test Abnormalities
the median age at diagnosis was 47 years (range 17-84
years). The majority of patients presented with subacute Routine laboratory tests are frequently within the normal
manifestations of diffuse CNS dysfunction. Acute presenta- range [2, 9, 28]. In some patients features of systemic
tion was highly unusual. The most common initial symptoms inflammatory response including anemia, leukocytosis and
were headache (63%) and cognitive impairment (50%). moderately increased acute phase reactants (ESR, C-reactive
Headaches were initially of low intensity and progressively protein and platelet counts) can be observed [2, 9]. Labora-
worsened. Cognitive impairment was also insidious. Focal tory tests are useful to rule out other diseases which may
symptoms usually appeared later in the course of the disease present with similar symptoms such as infection, systemic
and included hemiparesis (44%), stroke (40%), aphasia vasculitis, malignancy, drug abuse and hypercoagulability
(28%), transient ischemic attack (28%), ataxia (19%), sei- states [5, 28, 29].
zures (16%), dysarthria (15%) and blurred vision or de-
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is abnormal in 80-90% of pa-
creased visual acuity (11%). Infrequent manifestations, oc-
tients [9]. Increased protein concentration is the most com-
curring in less than 10% of patients, included intracranial
mon finding. In a series of 101 patients, mean CSF protein
hemorrhage, amnesic syndrome, spinal cord manifestations
concentration was 7 gr/L (range 1.5-10.3 gr/L) [9]. Pressure
such as paraparesis o quadriparesis, parkinsonism, vertigo,
is increased in 50% of patients and elevated lymphocyte
dizziness or cranial nerve palsy. Most patients had multiple
manifestations. Other published series report similar findings counts may be observed in 50-80%. CSF oligoclonal immu-
noglobulins may be found in up to 50% of individuals with
[22, 23].
PACNS [5, 23]. CSF pleocytosis is modest, rarely exceeding
In order to facilitate clinical recognition and early diag- 250 cells/μL. Higher leukocyte counts and the presence of
nosis, clinical manifestations have been grouped in three neutrophils are uncommon and, when present, should alert

Written for

Institution
Central Nervous System Vasculitis
Course
Central Nervous System Vasculitis

Document information

Uploaded on
August 10, 2024
Number of pages
12
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$15.99
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
TIFFACADEMICS Liberty University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
682
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
375
Documents
6202
Last sold
2 months ago
REING SUPREME SCHOLARLY // ENLIGHTENED

Here we offer revised study materials to elevate your educational outcomes. We have verified learning materials (Research,Assignments,notes etc...) for different courses guaranteed to boost your academic results. We are dedicated to offering you the best services and you are encouraged to inquire further assistance from our end if need be. Having a wide knowledge in Nursing,trust us to take care of your Academic materials and your remaing duty will just be to Excel. Remember to give us a review,it is key for us to understand our clients satisfaction. We highly appreciate refferals given to us. Also clients who always come back for more of the study content your offer are extremely valued. ALL THE BEST.

Read more Read less
3.6

134 reviews

5
59
4
12
3
34
2
11
1
18

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions