100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Other

LML4806 Assignment 01 sem2 Due 20 Aug 2024 Qualify

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
5
Uploaded on
08-08-2024
Written in
2024/2025

The statutory business judgment rule is a legal principle designed to protect directors and officers of a corporation from liability for decisions that could be seen as detrimental to the company, provided those decisions are made in good faith, with due care, and in the best interests of the company. This rule essentially recognizes that business decisions inherently involve risks and uncertainties, and it encourages directors to make bold and thoughtful choices without the constant fear of facing legal repercussions for such decisions. ### Key Elements of the Statutory Business Judgment Rule 1. **Good Faith**: Directors must act honestly and with the sincere belief that their actions are in the best interests of the company. Any evidence indicating that decisions were made with an ulterior motive or for personal gain could undermine the defense provided by the business judgment rule. 2. **Informed Decision-Making**: The directors must demonstrate that they took reasonable steps to inform themselves about the relevant facts and circumstances before making a decision. This means they should engage in thorough research, seek expert advice if necessary, and evaluate their options carefully. 3. **Rational Basis**: The decision must have a rational basis. The directors don’t need to prove that the decision was the best possible one; rather, they must show that the choice they made was reasonable under the circumstances. ### Application to Jenkins Investments Ltd In the case of Jenkins Investments Ltd deciding to acquire a 10% shareholding in Abby Realtors Ltd, the directors can potentially invoke the statutory business judgment rule to shield themselves from liability. - **Assessment of Good Faith**: It should be established that the directors acted in good faith regarding the acquisition. If there is evidence that the acquisition aligns with the company's strategic goals or enhances its value, it strengthens their position. - **Informed Decision**: To bolster their defense, the directors should maintain documentation showing that they conducted due diligence on Abby Realtors Ltd. This might include analyzing financial statements, market conditions, and the potential benefits of the investment. Engaging financial advisors or consultants could further substantiate their claim of informed decision-making. - **Rational Basis**: The rationale behind acquiring a stake in Abby Realtors Ltd should be documented. For example, if the directors believe that Abby is poised for growth or offers synergies that can benefit Jenkins, this logic would support their decision. ### Conclusion If the directors of Jenkins Investments Ltd can convincingly demonstrate that their decision to acquire the 10% stake in Abby Realtors Ltd was made in good faith, informed by relevant information, and based on a rational assessment, they may successfully rely on the statutory business judgment rule to mitigate any potential liability arising from this decision. However, the burden of proof may lie with the directors to establish these criteria adequately, particularly if any stakeholders or shareholders question the wisdom or motivations behind this investment.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
August 8, 2024
Number of pages
5
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Other
Person
Unknown

Subjects

Content preview

QUALITY ANSWER 2024 ASSIGNMENT 01
COMPANY LAW
ASSIGNMENT 01
MODULE CODE : LML4806
SEMESTER 2 ASSIGNMENT 1 – 2024
Question 1
Nancy must prove that the Touring Africa by Bicycle (Pty) Ltd is bound by the contract
concluded by James on behalf of the company, if the company
relies on Jame's lack of authority therefore
Nancy must prove the requirements for Estoppel. She must prove:
*That Touring Africa by Bicycle (Pty) Ltd misrepresented (i.e the misrepresentation
was made by the
company).
* The misrepresentation was made intentionally or negligently that James in fact had
the necessary authority to represent the company.
*That she, as a reasonable third party, was induced to deal/ conclude the contract
with James on the basis of the misrepresentation.
*That she was prejudiced/ suffered damage due to the misrepresentation.


Estoppel applies only when the agent did not have actual authority to bind the company.
Take
particular note of the fact that the misrepresentation (i.e. that the agent had the
necessary authority
when, in fact, he or she did not) must have been made by the company as principal.
Based on such misrepresentation, the company will be prevented (estopped) from
denying liability if
the third party can prove that
(a) the company misrepresented, intentionally or negligently, that the agent concerned
had the

, necessary authority to represent the company
(b) the misrepresentation was made by the company
(c) the third party was induced to deal with the agent because of the misrepresentation
(d) the third party was prejudiced by the misrepresentation
In Freeman and Lockyer v Buckhurst Part Properties (Mangal) Ltd, the court decided
that estoppel
could not only arise from the Articles (note that this would be the Memorandum of
Incorporation in
terms of the current Companies Act), but also because the company with full knowledge
and
approval allowed an ordinary director to act as the managing director and, in this
manner, culpably
represented that he was entitled to act.




QUESTION 2
2.1 The statutory business judgment rule is a legal principle designed to protect
directors and officers of a corporation from liability for decisions that could be seen as
detrimental to the company, provided those decisions are made in good faith, with due
care, and in the best interests of the company. This rule essentially recognizes that
business decisions inherently involve risks and uncertainties, and it encourages
directors to make bold and thoughtful choices without the constant fear of facing legal
repercussions for such decisions.
Directors must act honestly and with the sincere belief that their actions are in the best
interests of the company. Any evidence indicating that decisions were made with an
ulterior motive or for personal gain could undermine the defence provided by the
business judgment rule.
The directors must demonstrate that they took reasonable steps to inform themselves
about the relevant facts and circumstances before making a decision. This means they
should engage in thorough research, seek expert advice if necessary, and evaluate

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
nancylonake University of South Africa (Unisa)
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
198
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
137
Documents
111
Last sold
1 month ago

4.3

10 reviews

5
5
4
3
3
2
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions