WGU D002 TEST LATEST UPDATE

WGU D002 TEST LATEST UPDATE Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) - ANSWER: Separate educational facilities were unequal Hobsen v. Hansen (1967) - ANSWER IDEA Part B nondiscriminatory assessment Diana v. California State Board of Education (1970) - ANSWER: Students must be evaluated in their primary language ANSWER: The state was unable to ascertain uneducability in PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (1972). Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia (1972) - ANSWER: In the event that there are insufficient funds, all programs should be proport ionally reduced to ensure that exceptional students receive an education, as outlined in section 504. Larry P. v. Riles (1979) - ANSWER IQ tests could not serve as the primary rationale for enrolling students in special programs. 1982 Board of Education Henrick Hudson School System v Rowley - ANSWER: Schools are not obligated to provide services that are superior; rather, they are required to provide services that are equal and appropriate, FAPE Irving Independent School District v Tatro 1984 - ANSWER medical procedures were a necessary service for students with physical disabilities ANSWER: In the case of Honig v. Doe (1988), it was determined that children with emotional or physical disabilities could not be excluded from schoo l for misconduct if their behavior was a manifestation of their disability. The conceptual comprehension of the "least restrictive environment" was fur ther solidified in the case of Daniel R. R. v. State Board of Education 1989. Forest Grove School District vs TA 2009; Florence County School District Four v Shannon Carter 1993 - ANSWER: When public schools are unable to provide a free, appropriate education, parents are compelled to enroll their children in pri vate