Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 8 pages
Summary

Summary nursfpx 4030 assessment 3 PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 8 pages

Instructions After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it. Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source's specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question. If you need some structure to organize your initial thoughts and research, the PICOT Question and Research Template document (accessible from the " Create PICO(T) Questions" page in the Capella library's Evidence Based Practice guide) might be helpful. In your submission, make sure you address the following grading criteria: Define a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach. Create a PICO(T)-formatted research question Identify sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question (databases, journals, websites, etc.). Explain the findings from articles or other sources of evidence as it relates to the identified health care issue. Explain the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question.

Content preview

PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach
Name
NursFpx 4030 Assessment 3
Instructor
February, 2024 PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach
The practice problem in question is adult women 18-65 years with uncomplicated urinary
tract infection (UTIs). Concerns arise in relation to the relapse of infection and microbiome disruption due to standard antibiotic treatment (Butler et al., 2022). As such, the intervention proposed to address this includes probiotics administration as an adjunct therapy. The comparison aims to determine if the administration of probiotics instead of a placebo supplement
causes effective symptom resolution, low recurrence rates and better effect on gut microbiota (Zare et al., 2022). This study will be conducted over the course of a 12-month treatment and follow-up period that aims to provide detailed information regarding future benefits for uncomplicated UTIs treated with probiotics in this kind of patient cohort.
Population (P): Women aged between18 to65 years with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Intervention (I): Probiotics used as a treatment measure. Comparison (C): Comparison with a placebo supplement. Outcome (O): Efficacy of the treatment in terms of symptomatic resolution, decrease in rates for recurrence, and patient-reported outcomes. Time (T): During a 12-month treatment and follow up.
Putting it all together: For adult women aged 18-65 years with uncomplicated UTIs, is probiotic administration superior to placebo supplementation for symptomatic relief; decreased recurrence rates and better patient-reported outcomes after a course of 12 months treatment plus follow up?
A PICO(T) approach is likely to elucidate the search for information concerning UTI in adult women. The presence of a structured framework contributes to an accurate formulation of the elements relevant for this study that can direct researchers to develop clear and specific research questions. The PICO(T) question components-patient population (P), intervention (I),

Document information

Uploaded on
April 15, 2024
Number of pages
8
Written in
2023/2024
Type
Summary
$10.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
samaritanwoman01
4.4
(18)
Sold
66
Followers
31
Items
291
Last sold
2 weeks ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions