offer and Acceptance
-1:
Answers
was considered
I -> Thornton ~slane
anofter
Parking
whereas Pharma society Boots was
rather an invitation totreat.
of
found there was an ver as the customer
↑
->
They
had A
ready paid money into the machine and
recieved ticket. Thus he was bound by the
terms and conditions
which were however
1
not
-> Lord
brought
intohis notice.
Denning." He was committed at
the very moment when he put his
money
into the machine. The contract was concluded
at that time.
"
, -> There was no offer in PS Boots as
the customer had to select the goods he
wished to purchase and the
for it rather than negotiaHe.
pay price
->
Danger? Poison? Death/ Injury, etc.
-> Display of oods for sale
-
9
offer
fr
!Y Invitation to treat
supplying information
->
treat
Not
see usmathinvitationto the offer
the shopkeeper
to and the shopkeeper
when accepts/rejects.
-> Advertisement could be consideredas
of information.
-
a
supply
-2) Manlityu Gibson
e
Man City
-
W Storer
-> concluded no valid -> Concluded thatthere is a
contract.
-
valid contract.
valid contractconcluded
-> Because
during
offer
->
when offer and acceptance
correspondante,
was not official. occurred. Offer was made
-> The wordings corporation
Yu which sent
stated that the tu "All reement ofsale"document
S
Council "may" be which accepted and
was
prepared
at
to sell to you
...."
promptly returnedby
the tenant.
, They
->
were decided correctly slight injustice
/
Gib son
maybe with the timing
as of the
election overs radowed pos
concluded contract.
I
sibly a
-> Gibson made a formal offer butsince
itwas notaccepted by the council there
was no concluded contract.
=>
I
/eastatement see
offer statementofintention
mainee
e3)
-> clear, unequivocal
statement of the which
offeror that he will signals the intention of
be legally bound by the party but they
sell something.
Interparty wishe bindingly
if the other al bound
party to
accepts leg -> Not
accept.
to
-> Non-binding
communication.
-
gy-> Unilateral contracts differ from bilateral contracts
unilateral contracts
asin only one
partyis obliged
from the outsetwhereas in hildteral
contracts there is an outstanding obligation
on either side
offer is valid
&
->That ·N as it was open lavailable
for to and perform the smoke
anyone try
ball challenge. There were no terms or
onditions seton which prohibited certain
+
'
only certain peopleto
12
peo·Pthe
try
-> Advertise ent
chewed mere pur fas the
~-
iS not company
signalled its intention to ally bound by ii
-
be
=1000 to the bank.
depositing
-1:
Answers
was considered
I -> Thornton ~slane
anofter
Parking
whereas Pharma society Boots was
rather an invitation totreat.
of
found there was an ver as the customer
↑
->
They
had A
ready paid money into the machine and
recieved ticket. Thus he was bound by the
terms and conditions
which were however
1
not
-> Lord
brought
intohis notice.
Denning." He was committed at
the very moment when he put his
money
into the machine. The contract was concluded
at that time.
"
, -> There was no offer in PS Boots as
the customer had to select the goods he
wished to purchase and the
for it rather than negotiaHe.
pay price
->
Danger? Poison? Death/ Injury, etc.
-> Display of oods for sale
-
9
offer
fr
!Y Invitation to treat
supplying information
->
treat
Not
see usmathinvitationto the offer
the shopkeeper
to and the shopkeeper
when accepts/rejects.
-> Advertisement could be consideredas
of information.
-
a
supply
-2) Manlityu Gibson
e
Man City
-
W Storer
-> concluded no valid -> Concluded thatthere is a
contract.
-
valid contract.
valid contractconcluded
-> Because
during
offer
->
when offer and acceptance
correspondante,
was not official. occurred. Offer was made
-> The wordings corporation
Yu which sent
stated that the tu "All reement ofsale"document
S
Council "may" be which accepted and
was
prepared
at
to sell to you
...."
promptly returnedby
the tenant.
, They
->
were decided correctly slight injustice
/
Gib son
maybe with the timing
as of the
election overs radowed pos
concluded contract.
I
sibly a
-> Gibson made a formal offer butsince
itwas notaccepted by the council there
was no concluded contract.
=>
I
/eastatement see
offer statementofintention
mainee
e3)
-> clear, unequivocal
statement of the which
offeror that he will signals the intention of
be legally bound by the party but they
sell something.
Interparty wishe bindingly
if the other al bound
party to
accepts leg -> Not
accept.
to
-> Non-binding
communication.
-
gy-> Unilateral contracts differ from bilateral contracts
unilateral contracts
asin only one
partyis obliged
from the outsetwhereas in hildteral
contracts there is an outstanding obligation
on either side
offer is valid
&
->That ·N as it was open lavailable
for to and perform the smoke
anyone try
ball challenge. There were no terms or
onditions seton which prohibited certain
+
'
only certain peopleto
12
peo·Pthe
try
-> Advertise ent
chewed mere pur fas the
~-
iS not company
signalled its intention to ally bound by ii
-
be
=1000 to the bank.
depositing
