100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary + articles Braembussche, A. (2009) Thinking Art | Aesthetics

Rating
5.0
(1)
Sold
6
Pages
41
Uploaded on
21-09-2021
Written in
2020/2021

Complete summary + additional articles. Very easy to understand and has ALL the necessary materials. Cum Laude final course grade. Braembussche, A. Thinking Art (2009) | Additional articles | Aesthetics | IBACS / International bachelor Arts and Culture

Show more Read less
Institution
Course











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Connected book

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Summarized whole book?
Yes
Uploaded on
September 21, 2021
Number of pages
41
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Aesthetics
Van den Braembussche, Thinking Art, An Introduction to Philosophy of Art (2009) & articles

Week 1

What is Aesthetics?
- Slight difference between Aesthetics and philosophy of arts
- About social distinction à distinguish our self from other people
- About what is art?
- Perception and experience à sensibility
- How we look at the world and categorize this world
- Aesthetics takes humanities approach (general, universal developments within the field of
aesthetics) à Social science perspective (world behind object of art)
- Aesthetics could be categorized as essentialist
- Aesthetics slowly becomes a more sociological theory of art (convergence) (Wolff,1993)




o Kant argues taste is pure à Bourdieu thinks this is elitist and argues taste
corresponds with social position
o Howard Becker (Artworlds) argues that there is not one definition, how we classify
depends on position we take as human beings à art exists in social institution,
definition socially constructed
- Definition aesthetics àThe philosophy of the beautiful or of art & A system of principles for
the appreciation of the beautiful
o Philosophical discipline, what is art and what isn’t à object of art/production
o Aesthetic judgement à focus on reception perception
§ Distinguish the beautiful / ugly
§ What is a taste/aesthetic judgement?
§ What are the conditions to make an aesthetic judgement possible à a priori
conditions that are central to make judgment?

Historical roots of aesthetics
- Plato and Aristotle
- Idea of catharsis in Greek tragedy à when feeling emotions from stage you clean own
- 18th century à aesthetics as independent philosophical discipline
o Autonomation (emancipation) of art / field of artistic production
§ Enlightenment à ability to think for yourself and of yourself as autonomous
person, not forced upon you by authority

, § Conventions not decided by e.g. kingdom but by field itself
o Crisis of aesthetic norms
§ Reinvention of what is art
o Emergence of modern (natural) sciences
§ Birth of positivism
§ Understanding empirical rules of world à to change society to better place
§ Countermovement rationality à roots artistic knowledge not in our rational
cognitive abilities but in our feelings, sensibility
§ What are rules of art and its appreciation
o Growing out of and against enlightenment à emergence romanticism & bildung
§ Take science methods to study but study sensibility
§ Not only use science to change to world but also use arts (civilize people)

Difference aesthetics and philosophy of art
- Aisthesis à science of sense perception/sensation/sensibility
o Used in epistemological way
o Baumgarten
§ Aesthetica (1750 – 58) à Focus on distinction scientific and aesthetic
judgement
§ Reflection on Poetry (1735) à term aesthetics used in more modern way
“what is the definition of poetry/art?”
- Philosophy of art à critical reflection on the nature of art
- Used interchangeably in course


Philosophy of art vs. social science
- Distinction philosophical and empirical question
- What is the nature of art

Philosophy of art vs. sociology of culture/taste
- Distinction is determined formally and not materially à both are studying aesthetic judgment
but different question
- Philosophical cannot be answered with empirical research
- Aesthetic judgments are normative by nature, social scientist leave opinion out

Philosophy of art vs. art criticism
- Similarities
o Both normative by nature
o Aestheticians are influenced by own taste in formulating theory à similar premises
o Aesthetic judgments in art criticism often rely on aesthetics theory
- Distinction
o Criticism focus on particular vs. aesthetics focus on general

, 1. Imitation theory = Reality - Artwork
2. Expression theories = Artist - Artwork
3. Formalism = Artwork
4. Synthesis of form and expression = Artist - Artwork & Artwork
5. Aesthetic judgement = Artwork - Viewer


Aesthetics

Week 2

The Imitation Theory of Art




Introduction to the imitation theory of arts (Plato)
- Meaning Mimesis: imitation, image, copy
- Central to theory à art can imitate reality
- Reality à everything we can observe though the senses (empirical = trough experience)
- Plato refers to reality à world of ideas and/or form (something beyond empirical reality) à
idealist

- Plato (428/427 – 347 BC)
o Together with Aristotle one of most important founders of European philosophy
o Wealthy aristocratic family (Thirty Tyrants)
o Grew up in a turbulent time
§ Continuous wars Greek cities
§ Transition worldview mythos to logos à Not all decided by gods, but can
think and decided for themselves
§ Peloponnesian war
o 387 BC: Founding of Akademeia
o 407 BC: Meeting with Socrates (all we know of Socrates comes from work of Plato)
o Not systematic in work, wrote dialogues: Symposion (Love), Phaido (Socrates’ dying
day), Timaios (origins of cosmology), Politeia (justification), Nomoi (morality),
Gorgias (rhetorics)

o Politeia (380 BC)
§ Part 1: Ethics - what is the ideal society?
§ Part 2: Ontology – study of nature of being
§ Ontology = metaphysics à reality is behind or beyond what is empirically
observable
§ Distinction reality (the noumenal world) and appearances (the phenomenal
world) à metaphysical idealism

, • The noumenal world = Reality and created by god à unity between
the true, the beautiful and the good
§ Appearance = sensorily perceivable but in constant flux à never perceive the
same object in the same manner twice
§ How do we know the noumenal world exist?
• Logic: distinction the one cat and the word ‘cat’ à based on common
denominator humans able to formulate universal category
• Metaphysics: the one cat is a copy of the Cat (the idea/form created by
god)
§ Distinction knowledge (about reality by using ratio) and opinion (sensory
perception)
§ Human being also has an ultimate form à beauty, truth and the good
• Access beauty only through knowledge

§ Allegory of the cave à explanation ontology and ethics
• We are like the prisoners in the cave
• Merely see shadows produced by puppet showman
• Cave is phenomenal world
• Outside is noumenal
• By using ratio people can escape cave à way people should take
(ethics)




§ Ideal republic
• The idea of the Good exists and needs to be quested
• Philosopher (he/she who loves wisdom/to see the truth) only one to
‘see’ the Good
• King philosophers should be in power at age 50, trained by acidaemia
• Social hierarchy: philosophers (politics), soldiers (security), the people
(manual labour)
• Goal is to reach optimum ‘justice’
o Communal economy (no private ownership/property) à
competition brings chaos
o Ascetic lifestyle (self-control and moderation are important
values) à too much emotions bring chaos
o Eugenetics (king philosophers choose perfect partner for you)
$7.66
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
2 year ago

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
emilrosilanz Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
77
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
53
Documents
6
Last sold
1 month ago
Erasmus University Rotterdam

4.0

15 reviews

5
6
4
7
3
0
2
0
1
2

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions