ASSIGNMENT 2
DUE DATE: 4 SEPTMEBER 2026
,A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE UNBORN CHILD IN
SOUTH AFRICA AND KENYA
by
[YOUR FULL NAMES]
(STUDENT NUMBER)
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree
LLB
In the
SCHOOL OF LAW
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA
SUPERVISOR: [LECTURER'S NAME]
ASSIGNMENT 02
2026
1
,TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 2
2. PROBLEM STATEMENT ..................................................................................... 5
3. HYPOTHESIS ...................................................................................................... 6
4. POINTS OF DEPARTURE AND ASSUMPTIONS ............................................... 7
5. CONCEPTUALISATION OF CENTRAL RESEARCH THEMES ......................... 10
6. PROPOSED CHAPTER OUTLAY ....................................................................... 12
7. PROJECTED TIME SCALE ................................................................................. 14
8. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED RESEARCH METHOD ................................... 15
9. PREPARATORY STUDY AND RESEARCH ....................................................... 16
10. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................... 21
11. BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................. 22
2
, 1. INTRODUCTION
The legal status of the unborn child has emerged as one of the most contentious and
emotionally charged issues in contemporary constitutional and human rights discourse.
At the heart of this debate lies a fundamental question: does the right to life, as
enshrined in constitutional instruments, extend to the unborn child? This research falls
within the broader fields of Constitutional Law and Human Rights Law, with a specific
focus on the interpretation of the right to life and the legal personhood of the unborn
child. The research is prompted by submissions from faith-based associations calling for
the reconsideration of the rights of the unborn child in South Africa, particularly in light of
the decision in S v Mshumpa 2008 (1) SACR 126 (E).¹
In South Africa, section 11 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
provides that "[e]veryone has the right to life."² The interpretation of the word "everyone"
has been the subject of significant judicial and academic debate. The faith-based
association's submission argues that the term "everyone" should include the unborn
child, and that the common law must be developed to reflect the legal convictions of the
community, which they contend is that killing a foetus should constitute a crime.³ They
are particularly dissatisfied with the stance taken by the Eastern Cape High Court in S v
Mshumpa, where the court refused to extend the definition of murder to include the
intentional killing of an unborn child.⁴
¹ S v Mshumpa 2008 (1) SACR 126 (E).
² Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, s 11.
³ Prescribed research topic document, LME3701 Semester 2 2026, 7.
⁴ S v Mshumpa 2008 (1) SACR 126 (E) [43].
3