Section 1:
Trespass
- unlawful entry, wrongful entry, breaking
and entering, breach, encroachment, infiltration, infringement, illegal entry, forced
entry, intrude, invasion of privacy
Restroom
- indecency, sex separation, bathroom, public
restroom, washroom, public, john, head, latrine, women’s room, men’s room
Excessively Long
- disproportionately long, unreasonably
long, extremely long, lengthy, undesirably long
Slipped and Fell
- lose balance, trip, wet floor, fall,
tumble, spill, stumble, collapse, plummet, crash
Grocery Store
- supermarket, convenience store, mom
and pop shop, bodega, corner store, food mart, market, retail store
Informed
- instruction, direction, guidance
Store Personnel
- employee, associate, manager, worker,
assistant manager, hired person
Employees Only
- restricted area, private, access,
trespass, wrongful entry
Section 2:
1.
This opinion is not on point since the argument was
in relation to bankruptcy, not divorce. It is a primary persuasive for a court
in Dallas, Texas because this case took place in Louisiana. The opinion does not
support Mrs. Smith’s contention because the court found that the jewelry
was community property. However, they only came to that conclusion because
Mr. Soule and his wife deliberately listed the jewelry as community property
in writing in order to receive bank loans.
2.
This opinion is not on point since the argument was
not if the gifted jewelry was separate property, but if the wife could collect insurance
checks off of that jewelry. It is a primary persuasive for a court in
Dallas, Texas because the case took place in New York. The opinion does not support
Mrs. Smith’s contention because the ownership of gifted jewelry from husband
to wife was explicitly written into their prenuptial agreement. The wife
has it in writing that the jewelry is her separate property, while Mrs. Smith does not.
This case also does not mention anything about jewelry that the wife purchased
with community money. 3.
This opinion is on point since it is the same argument
over if jewelry gifted to the wife from the husband is community or separate property.
The opinion is a primary persuasive for a court in Dallas, Texas because
it took place in Florida. The opinion does not support Mrs. Smith since the
court reversed their decision and found that the jewelry was community property.
Had the initial opinion not been reversed, it would have supported Mrs. Smith’s
claim.
Trespass
- unlawful entry, wrongful entry, breaking
and entering, breach, encroachment, infiltration, infringement, illegal entry, forced
entry, intrude, invasion of privacy
Restroom
- indecency, sex separation, bathroom, public
restroom, washroom, public, john, head, latrine, women’s room, men’s room
Excessively Long
- disproportionately long, unreasonably
long, extremely long, lengthy, undesirably long
Slipped and Fell
- lose balance, trip, wet floor, fall,
tumble, spill, stumble, collapse, plummet, crash
Grocery Store
- supermarket, convenience store, mom
and pop shop, bodega, corner store, food mart, market, retail store
Informed
- instruction, direction, guidance
Store Personnel
- employee, associate, manager, worker,
assistant manager, hired person
Employees Only
- restricted area, private, access,
trespass, wrongful entry
Section 2:
1.
This opinion is not on point since the argument was
in relation to bankruptcy, not divorce. It is a primary persuasive for a court
in Dallas, Texas because this case took place in Louisiana. The opinion does not
support Mrs. Smith’s contention because the court found that the jewelry
was community property. However, they only came to that conclusion because
Mr. Soule and his wife deliberately listed the jewelry as community property
in writing in order to receive bank loans.
2.
This opinion is not on point since the argument was
not if the gifted jewelry was separate property, but if the wife could collect insurance
checks off of that jewelry. It is a primary persuasive for a court in
Dallas, Texas because the case took place in New York. The opinion does not support
Mrs. Smith’s contention because the ownership of gifted jewelry from husband
to wife was explicitly written into their prenuptial agreement. The wife
has it in writing that the jewelry is her separate property, while Mrs. Smith does not.
This case also does not mention anything about jewelry that the wife purchased
with community money. 3.
This opinion is on point since it is the same argument
over if jewelry gifted to the wife from the husband is community or separate property.
The opinion is a primary persuasive for a court in Dallas, Texas because
it took place in Florida. The opinion does not support Mrs. Smith since the
court reversed their decision and found that the jewelry was community property.
Had the initial opinion not been reversed, it would have supported Mrs. Smith’s
claim.
