WGU D626 Task 2 Comprehensive Public Health PolicyEvaluation(WarrenCounty)Opioid Response Plan2026 Update with complete solutions 100 % correct & verified

D626: Public Health policy and advocacy Task 2: Public Health Policy Evaluation A: Summary 2 The proposed Warren County’s county-level opioid response plan will target the rural residents facing the highest risk for opioid use disorder, more specifically, those individuals facing socioeconomic challenges, transportation challenges, learning barriers, and low treatment services access. The policy will seek to solve the ongoing issue of opioid overdoses that exist in the county where most deaths have been caused by the drug fentanyl and the communities facing higher risks in the county due to lack of access to medications (DiNapoli, 2022). The intervention will create an effective system of prevention, harm reduction, connection to treatment services, enforcement, and community education, all based on the successful programs in counties like Virginia, and aligned with similar initiatives taking place in New York State. The public health outcomes expected are fewer deaths from overdoses, improved retention and engagement with medications used in treating opioid use disorders, reduced rehospitalizations, and equality in accessing the service for all people in the rural communities (Schuler et al., 2021). B1: Stakeholders The main stakeholders in the implementation of the comprehensive plan in Warren County will be the Warren County Department of Public Health, Warren County Sheriff’s Office, Warren Office of Community Service, Glens Falls Hospital, and the Warren/Washington Counties Criminal Justice & Community Services Task Force. These stakeholders will assist in coordinating the process of overdose reporting using the Overdose Response Dashboard of the County, providing naloxone, harm reduction programs, and the distribution of opioid settlement funds. The Warren community members, those with lived experience, and non-profit groups will also be important to the project as they will provide feedback on local needs and participate in educational and outreach activities. Other major stakeholders will include the Warren County Board of Supervisors, who make the funding and policy decisions, and the NYS Office of Addiction Services and Supports (OASAS) at the state level, along with any funding sources from any settlements involving opioids. Healthcare professionals will help with administration of medication treatment for OUD and post-discharge linkage services, whereas policy-makers at the county level will ensure that this strategy is coordinated with statewide strategies. B2: Program The comprehensive county-level opioid response plan aims to tackle the imminent need for an integrated approach in Warren County, where rural people are facing increased rates of 3 overdoses caused by an increase in fentanyl, lack of treatment facilities, difficulty in transportation, and socio-economic issues associated with increased opioid abuse (DiNapoli, 2022). The expected impacts of this policy are lower rates of overdose deaths, better engagement with MOUD treatment, fewer readmissions after acute episodes, and increased fairness in services for marginalized rural communities (Krawczyk et al., 2026). The possible policy activities are likely to involve data tracking via the County Overdose Response Dashboard, naloxone provision and training, harm reduction measures, improved linkage after discharge to MOUD and behavioral treatments, educational outreach programs that consider learning styles, and partnerships among law enforcement agencies, health care providers, and addiction recovery resources. This policy will need resources such as opioid settlement money, state grant money, workers from the Public Health Department, employees from Glens Falls Hospital, collaboration with OASAS, and funding for data systems and training providers (Li et al., 2025). B3: Evaluation of Effectiveness 1. To what extent has the plan decreased the number of opioid-related deaths and visits to the emergency department? 2. How successful is the plan at getting people with opioid use disorder (OUD) more involved with medication treatment? 3. To what extent has the plan contributed to equitable access for rural communities who have socio-economic, transportation, and educational challenges B3a: Question Explanation The first question (To what extent has the plan decreased the number of opioid-related deaths and visits to the emergency department) relates to the CDC framework on the bases of relevance and usefulness because it measures the effectiveness of the plan by measuring its main health benefit in a high-burden county and generates information that is useful to all stakeholders. Regarding promoting rigor, the question is founded on measurable criteria, for instance, the information available from the county dashboards and vital statistics that help evaluate the impact possible despite the constraints of the context, including estimates of deaths (CDC, 2024). The second research question (how successful is the plan at getting people with opioid use disorder (OUD) more involved with medication treatment) speaks to the focus of the model on the generation of credible evidence and learning from insights. The question looks into the 4 intermediate effect of the policy concerning patient care trajectory that which is vital to decreasing mortality (CDC, 2024). The third question (to what extent has the plan contributed to equitable access for rural communities who face socio-economic, transportation, and educational challenges) helps ensure that evaluations are conducted in a fair and just manner by considering equity issues and stakeholder perspectives, in line with the framework's ethical practices (CDC, 2024).