Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 5 pages
Other

Sentinel Event Analysis Using Root Cause Analysis: NSG 1540/ NSG1540 | Final Answered , Latest .

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 5 pages

Sentinel Event Analysis Using Root Cause Analysis: NSG 1540/ NSG1540 | Final Answered , Latest .

Content preview

Sentinel Event Analysis Using Root Cause Analysis


Step 1: Choose a Sentinel Event


- Hospital-acquired infection leading to death


Step 2: Analyze the Event Using the RCA Framework


1. Brief Summary of the Event: A 70 year old female patient was admitted to the medical-

surgical unit at Lakewood Medical Center. She had history of a stroke that left her with right-

sided weakness and urinary incontinence. She now had a trip and fall at home, and her

daughter brought her to the hospital for evaluation. Imaging done in the ER revealed a right-

sided femur fracture. She was scheduled for orthopedic surgery in the morning. The provider

requested an indwelling foley catheter be placed prior to the procedure and to aid with

comfort. The surgery was successful, but the patient remained in significant pain

postoperatively and was bedridden. The Foley catheter was not removed and remained in

place for seven days. On the evening of day 7, the patient began showing signs of urinary

tract infection. She was experiencing mild confusion, low-grade fever, and cloudy urine. The

nurse decided to get orders for a urine culture, which on day 9 came back positive for E.coli.

At this time the patient went septic, she was hypotensive and had a fever of 104. Sepsis

protocol was initiated; however aggressive fluids and antibiotics did not work. The patient

died from multi-organ failure on day 11 and this was determined a sentinel event due to

preventable measures. After chart review, no documentation of catheter care or assessments

was found.

2. Identify the Root Causes

a. What were the contributing factors?

- The contributing factors were the length of time the foley catheter remained in place

and the possible cleanliness of the catheter. Foleys should be cleaned with CHG

, Sentinel Event Analysis Using Root Cause Analysis


wipes daily and documented. Foleys should also be assessed daily, and nurses should

document needs assessments that determine if a catheter is still necessary.

b. Consider human, environmental, communication, and systems-level issues.

- Absent documentation is a human error. There should always be documentation for

Foley catheter assessments. This could also be related to a communication error

between employees caring for this patient. For example, it is possible that both the

nurse and tech assumed the other would clean the catheter and due to lack of

communication it never got done by either. I also see this as a system error.

Employees should be properly trained in Foley care and documentation.


3. Propose Corrective Actions

a. What could have been done differently?

- The catheter could’ve been removed much earlier to prevent infection. Hospital

guidelines recommend daily evaluation of catheter necessity and removal if no longer

appropriate (Patel, 2023). CHG wipes should have been used daily, and

documentation should have reflected catheter cleaning/care. Better nurse-nurse

communication, collaboration, and delegation may have changed the outcome.


b. Suggest at least two specific system-level improvements to reduce risk.

- Implement an automatic EHR Foley Care Checklist: This would start with an

indwelling catheter insertion checklist. It would require two nurses to sign off and

would go through the steps on properly inserting a foley catheter. The check-list

would focus on hygiene and aseptic technique (Whitaker, 2023). This system would

also cover daily documentation prompts for Foley catheter assessments. It would

Document information

Uploaded on
July 24, 2026
Number of pages
5
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Other
Person
Unknown
$16.39

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
MindCraft
3.8
(47)
Sold
368
Followers
7
Items
2790
Last sold
4 hours ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions